Matilda
- 2017
- 2h 10min
CALIFICACIÓN DE IMDb
5.3/10
2.4 k
TU CALIFICACIÓN
Agrega una trama en tu idiomaIn the twilight of Imperial Russia, prima ballerina Matilda Kshesinskaya becomes the mistress of three Grand Dukes.In the twilight of Imperial Russia, prima ballerina Matilda Kshesinskaya becomes the mistress of three Grand Dukes.In the twilight of Imperial Russia, prima ballerina Matilda Kshesinskaya becomes the mistress of three Grand Dukes.
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Elenco
- Premios
- 3 premios ganados y 11 nominaciones en total
Danila Kozlovsky
- Vorontsov
- (as Danila Kozlovskiy)
Grigory Dobrygin
- Grand Duke Andrei Vladimirovich of Russia
- (as Grigoriy Dobrygin)
- Dirección
- Guionistas
- Todo el elenco y el equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Opiniones destacadas
Uchitel has made a few good movies but his last few films are pure junk. Pity!
Love Russian film and have a soft spot for the Russian language (a beautiful one, though it takes time to get your head around the phonetic alphabet, the symbols, the stresses and the hard and soft signs), having studied singing in it on my vocal and operatic studies course. The story here in 'Mathilde' was an interesting one. So decided to see it as choice film of the night with my sister on Amazon.
My sister did find it a little more interesting than me, though she didn't have prior knowledge to the story (or of the Russian language other than hearing me sing in it) before watching, compared to me having knowledge of some of it. As for me, do have to agree with those who were really let down, some insulted, by 'Mathilde'. Not irredeemable but there is a lot wrong with it, more wrong than there is right. It has been rightly said that much of, well almost all of, 'Mathilde' is a fabrication or at least heavily fictionalised. The often gross liberties did make a lot of it far less plausible and increasingly difficult to take seriously, but actually there is far more to the problem than the lack of historical accuracy.
Credit is due that 'Mathilde' is a visually stunning film. The period detail, interiors and exteriors, are mounted exquisitely and makes one envious and the costumes are also a sumptuous visual feast evocative to period. All complemented by beautiful, if sometimes too "artsy", cinematography.
The music, always an important asset for me to talk about when reviewing films, is both lush and atmospheric, like a character of its own in its best bits and having a presence without being over-bearing. It starts off reasonably intriguingly, though this doesn't last for long.
However, 'Mathilde' succeeds badly in having a potentially interesting story and making it often deadly dull. The pace is lifeless with too many scenes going on for far too long in a rather ostentatious way and some of the film felt like padding. Some of it unnecessary and at other points confusing. Too much of the story is soapy and melodramatic, with no tension or emotion, to the point of unintentional silliness (the climax being absurdly over-the-top). The script is stilted and like something out of a bad stale soap opera, as well as being over-speculative and devoid of any emotion.
Didn't care or believe for any of the characters (that's including the central couple), none of them come over as real or are given any depth. Some add absolutely nothing to the story too and either complicate it or make the film more over-the-top than it already is. The direction gets the style right but when it comes to the substance it falls completely flat on its face from the get go, with scenes intended to be intense or moving, like the train crash or the climax, having nothing to them. The acting is not much better, with a bland female lead and cartoonish "villains", as well as Nicholas being played far too stiffly. Nicholas' father is the best acted of the lot (to me that is) but is not in it much. The chemistry between the two leads isn't there either, some of it looking under-rehearsed.
Overall, disappointing with a good deal of interest botched by weak execution. 3/10 Bethany Cox
My sister did find it a little more interesting than me, though she didn't have prior knowledge to the story (or of the Russian language other than hearing me sing in it) before watching, compared to me having knowledge of some of it. As for me, do have to agree with those who were really let down, some insulted, by 'Mathilde'. Not irredeemable but there is a lot wrong with it, more wrong than there is right. It has been rightly said that much of, well almost all of, 'Mathilde' is a fabrication or at least heavily fictionalised. The often gross liberties did make a lot of it far less plausible and increasingly difficult to take seriously, but actually there is far more to the problem than the lack of historical accuracy.
Credit is due that 'Mathilde' is a visually stunning film. The period detail, interiors and exteriors, are mounted exquisitely and makes one envious and the costumes are also a sumptuous visual feast evocative to period. All complemented by beautiful, if sometimes too "artsy", cinematography.
The music, always an important asset for me to talk about when reviewing films, is both lush and atmospheric, like a character of its own in its best bits and having a presence without being over-bearing. It starts off reasonably intriguingly, though this doesn't last for long.
However, 'Mathilde' succeeds badly in having a potentially interesting story and making it often deadly dull. The pace is lifeless with too many scenes going on for far too long in a rather ostentatious way and some of the film felt like padding. Some of it unnecessary and at other points confusing. Too much of the story is soapy and melodramatic, with no tension or emotion, to the point of unintentional silliness (the climax being absurdly over-the-top). The script is stilted and like something out of a bad stale soap opera, as well as being over-speculative and devoid of any emotion.
Didn't care or believe for any of the characters (that's including the central couple), none of them come over as real or are given any depth. Some add absolutely nothing to the story too and either complicate it or make the film more over-the-top than it already is. The direction gets the style right but when it comes to the substance it falls completely flat on its face from the get go, with scenes intended to be intense or moving, like the train crash or the climax, having nothing to them. The acting is not much better, with a bland female lead and cartoonish "villains", as well as Nicholas being played far too stiffly. Nicholas' father is the best acted of the lot (to me that is) but is not in it much. The chemistry between the two leads isn't there either, some of it looking under-rehearsed.
Overall, disappointing with a good deal of interest botched by weak execution. 3/10 Bethany Cox
It's fantastical new movie made by one of the best modern Russian director Aleksey Uchitel. Definitely, you can't recognised this movie as "the real" story - and so what? Yes, it's another beautiful fairy tail about Love, but how professionally it was done! Perfect costumes, perfect casting, perfect example of "virtual history" (sort of "virtual history" we all know from ancient classic Latin writers), very dynamic, very, very, very!
The main drama of the movie is the conflict between THE LOVE and THE ONUS, and if the Emperor of Russian Empire could have the choice in it (it's an ancient dilemma of the world: Love vs Onus).
IMHO all the scandal around this movie happened in Russia (organised by Orthodox church) is total fake and totally idiotic!
9 from 10 without any doubts! This movie must be seen! Thank you Mr. Uchitel!
The main drama of the movie is the conflict between THE LOVE and THE ONUS, and if the Emperor of Russian Empire could have the choice in it (it's an ancient dilemma of the world: Love vs Onus).
IMHO all the scandal around this movie happened in Russia (organised by Orthodox church) is total fake and totally idiotic!
9 from 10 without any doubts! This movie must be seen! Thank you Mr. Uchitel!
If this movie is using real persons names, it shouldn't be so far from real facts. Sadly, it is from the very start, where Nicky faints during his wedding. Utter nonsense, as it is known that he was genuinely in love with Alix (that marriage did not made his mother happy as she hoped for better standing partner for him). It is funny to see ppl from Russia call Nicholas and Alexandra saints (they were a normal happy couple, just totally unfit for ruling, and victims of both their actions and historical events). Yet this movie really made even me angry. Why not take real facts which are interesting enough? Why make such a stupid script? Moreover, the actors don't resemble the people they are playing to the least.
First off this is a film not a documentary or a historical event so people complaining of inaccuracies are simple minded. Beautiful set! Beautiful costumes and although I wanted a little more in depth at both characters I enjoyed this film. I'm a lover of Russian culture, history and language. I found this film to be wonderfully done with portrayal of Nicholas to be splendid. I did find the ending to be a little rushed or I guess "off" kind of thrown in our faces instead of tied together. Nevertheless I enjoyed it and will watch again.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaIt was first planned that the main role would be played by Keira Knightley.
- ConexionesEdited into Koronatsiya (2019)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Mathilde?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 15,000,000 (estimado)
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 9,365,944
- Tiempo de ejecución2 horas 10 minutos
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
By what name was Matilda (2017) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda