Michael lleva a su novia Jenny a un hermoso y extraño pueblo de montaña donde todo el mundo parece familiar. Pero él empieza a ver y oír cosas que nadie más puede.Michael lleva a su novia Jenny a un hermoso y extraño pueblo de montaña donde todo el mundo parece familiar. Pero él empieza a ver y oír cosas que nadie más puede.Michael lleva a su novia Jenny a un hermoso y extraño pueblo de montaña donde todo el mundo parece familiar. Pero él empieza a ver y oír cosas que nadie más puede.
Chelsea D.
- Upscale restaurant guest
- (as Chelsea P. Day)
Opiniones destacadas
While I always love to see Lance Henriksen in a movie and this one had potential, the lad actor is atrocious in every sense of the word. It makes the movie hard to watch and gives you a feeling of dread to hear the next words being shot out of his mouth like an over-dramatic prepubescent teenager throwing a tantrum in every scene.... a completely unbelievable character that you want to see die early on.
The rest of the acting is okay and easy to watch (wish they would've made Lance the lead, or even the blond bellhop at the hotel would've been much better). The idea behind the movie is interesting and makes you want to see what's going to happen, although it is a bit predictable, but always fun to see the why behind the what in these types of stories.....
The rest of the acting is okay and easy to watch (wish they would've made Lance the lead, or even the blond bellhop at the hotel would've been much better). The idea behind the movie is interesting and makes you want to see what's going to happen, although it is a bit predictable, but always fun to see the why behind the what in these types of stories.....
The movie has a decent premise with elements of mystery, thriller, and supernatural flick thrown in. The scripting was somewhat stilted and awkward, but could have been worse. It jumps around a lot and gets a little silly, but it ties everything together nicely and gives you a nice, though predictable, twist. The filming was good.
But the lead actor was absolutely the worst. His tone was completely flat. He sounded exactly the same throughout the entire movie. Confusion, anger, love - every emotion was portrayed with the exact same tone and intonation. And who talks like this guy? I get that in written form it may have seemed fine, but the language was totally unnatural. People don't say "they are". They say "they're". How did nobody notice how labored his speech sounded? Is that how he talks in real life, or just when he's trying to act? Most of the other acting was okay (although none of it was particularly memorable), but the lead drove me nuts and made the movie totally unenjoyable.
I watched it in bits and pieces while doing midnight feedings with my newborn. I don't know that I would have been able to handle it beginning to end in one sitting. I'd say it's fine if you have a couple hours to kill, but I wouldn't go out of my way to watch it.
But the lead actor was absolutely the worst. His tone was completely flat. He sounded exactly the same throughout the entire movie. Confusion, anger, love - every emotion was portrayed with the exact same tone and intonation. And who talks like this guy? I get that in written form it may have seemed fine, but the language was totally unnatural. People don't say "they are". They say "they're". How did nobody notice how labored his speech sounded? Is that how he talks in real life, or just when he's trying to act? Most of the other acting was okay (although none of it was particularly memorable), but the lead drove me nuts and made the movie totally unenjoyable.
I watched it in bits and pieces while doing midnight feedings with my newborn. I don't know that I would have been able to handle it beginning to end in one sitting. I'd say it's fine if you have a couple hours to kill, but I wouldn't go out of my way to watch it.
This movie could have been decent. The story line held our attention. The filming quality was not bad at all. However, I just could not get over the lead character acting.. Instead of casting himself in the lead role, the writer should have found another to take his place.....anyone.
I could see this script being picked up for a remake someday. It's certainly not a great film. But, it has potential. I didn't see this as your typical B-movie overall. It's just that the lead performance was far below the quality of the rest of the film IMO.
I can only imagine what the other actors thought of the film when watching it. What a shame.
I could see this script being picked up for a remake someday. It's certainly not a great film. But, it has potential. I didn't see this as your typical B-movie overall. It's just that the lead performance was far below the quality of the rest of the film IMO.
I can only imagine what the other actors thought of the film when watching it. What a shame.
In MONDAY AT 11:01 A. M., a young couple named Michael and Jenny (Charles Agron and Lauren Shaw) experience bizarre circumstances upon entering a hotel in a small town.
Everyone the pair encounters acts rather suspiciously, and a local bartender (Lance Henriksen) seems almost omniscient, and a bit too helpful.
Michael begins having what appear to be hallucinations, and believes that he and Jenny might be in the midst of a dark, occult conspiracy. Either that, or he's losing his mind.
PROS: This movie isn't a bad trip into the beyond. It's loaded with nightmare images and a paranoiac atmosphere. Henriksen is especially effective in his enigmatic role.
CONS: The problems with this movie are twofold: #1- It's length. The story feels padded out, and would be better suited as part of an anthology film, or as an episode of a show like THE TWILIGHT ZONE. #2- The finale is rushed. After the big build-up, it just doesn't end in an overly satisfying way.
Still, it's recommended for fans of Mr. Henriksen, since he's really good in it!...
Everyone the pair encounters acts rather suspiciously, and a local bartender (Lance Henriksen) seems almost omniscient, and a bit too helpful.
Michael begins having what appear to be hallucinations, and believes that he and Jenny might be in the midst of a dark, occult conspiracy. Either that, or he's losing his mind.
PROS: This movie isn't a bad trip into the beyond. It's loaded with nightmare images and a paranoiac atmosphere. Henriksen is especially effective in his enigmatic role.
CONS: The problems with this movie are twofold: #1- It's length. The story feels padded out, and would be better suited as part of an anthology film, or as an episode of a show like THE TWILIGHT ZONE. #2- The finale is rushed. After the big build-up, it just doesn't end in an overly satisfying way.
Still, it's recommended for fans of Mr. Henriksen, since he's really good in it!...
Waste of time. The writer/lead actor "Charles Agron" should literally never make another movie again.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaFilmed in Guthrie, Oklahoma with mountains superimposed on it
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta
Principales brechas de datos
What is the English language plot outline for Monday at 11:01 A.M. (2016)?
Responda