Night Walk

The other reviews are either 10 stars or, like mine, 1 star. If you are warmed by the religious sentiment I guess you'll love this film. If you love good films.... just don't watch it. Truly awful.

I wouldn't want my name attached to this steaming pile of garbage! It's all over the place, constantly jumping back and forth in time, people are referencing things that we're not shown, but we're expected to know what they're talking about. I honestly felt like the editor accidentally cut out crucial bits of the movie and no one realized it until the movie was released.

The writing isn't the only thing that sucks; the acting is ATROCIOUS! Not even Mickey Rourke nor Erc Robert's, legends of the acting world, could save this stinker! It's a disjointed embarasment and I highly recommend saving your time and money!

I don't know what the psyche is with Rourke nowadays. There once was a time after his 10 yr hiatus where he mentioned he admitted his mistakes, etc...and that it was a humbling experience.

It appears that he's on the mindset like he was before all of that happened. In his recent comment on marvel, he said its "crap" acting. How could he say that compare to what he's been doing lately. First of all, he's completely type casted because he's so worried about his looks.

As a fan of the younger Rourke, I can't believe what officially crap movies he's doing and the acting esp! Are you kidding me? He's comparing what he's been doing to Marvel???

Yes, Marvel is purely eye candy..but guess what?? The acting in it is 100 times more believable than the quality of acting and films he has been doing.

I keep hoping that there will be a change...I've paid to see Night Walk..I paid to watch Adverse...I think perhaps "Tiger" looks like a quality film, but its MIA.

Anyway, I digress.... Night Walk was a serious waste...All actors in this film was horrid. Perhaps the only entertaining person in this film was Patrick Kilpatrick.

When you see headliner names like Mickey Rourke, Eric Roberts and Louis Mandylor, you'd expect a fairly decent B-grade film with the trio as leads. Wrong. If there was such a thing, this would be a F-grade film. Firstly, Mandylor may have had 30 seconds tops of screen time. Roberts, maybe 2 minutes, if even that, total screen time. Rourke, maybe 3 minutes total, tops - in a miserably long and dragged out 97 minute religious propaganda film. I'm questioning if they even knew they were being cast in a religious propaganda film.

Writer, director, producer, and actor in this film Aziz Tazi wrote a sloppy convoluted plot-issues riddled cringe-worthy story which didn't know what it wanted to focus on; wrongfully accused? High level corruption? Religious conversion? Prison escape? Retribution? It was just a sloppy convoluted mess.

The directing, cinematography and editing was probably the worst I've ever seen. You will shake your head when you see how some of the scenes were filmed. The score and sound were atrocious. The cast were not properly directed, and most looked like it was there first acting gig. Aside from the top trio (non)leads, the (at)best and only convincing performance was by Patrick Kilpatrick, who basically carried the performances on his shoulder.

I've reviewed over 1,000 films on this site, and this has to be in my top 10 worst films of all time. I's a very generous 2/10 from me, all going to the absentee trio stars and Kilpatrick.

This was horrible. Bad acting and bad story. Those 10 out of 10 people must be robots 🤖