Animales fantásticos: Los crímenes de Grindelwald
Título original: Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald
Es la segunda secuela de Animales Fantásticos que cuenta las aventuras del Mago zoologista, Newt Scamander.Es la segunda secuela de Animales Fantásticos que cuenta las aventuras del Mago zoologista, Newt Scamander.Es la segunda secuela de Animales Fantásticos que cuenta las aventuras del Mago zoologista, Newt Scamander.
- Nominada a2premios BAFTA
- 3 premios ganados y 22 nominaciones en total
Cornell John
- Arnold Guzman
- (as Cornell S. John)
Resumen
Reviewers say 'Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald' offers a darker tone and expanded world-building with mixed reception. Praised for performances by Eddie Redmayne, Johnny Depp, and Jude Law, and impressive visual effects, the film struggles with a convoluted plot and numerous subplots. Critics argue it lacks focus, serving more as a setup for future installments. Disappointment arises from the limited role of fantastic beasts and an underdeveloped villain. Despite these issues, some appreciate its deeper exploration of the wizarding world and ties to the Harry Potter series.
Opiniones destacadas
The visuals are great, but there is no story. The film is just a collage of scenes with strange creatures appearing for no reason at all. The vast number of characters don't help to make the plot any easier to decipher. The only scenes that I enjoyed are the ones in Hogwarts. That's because at least I know what they are about.
As both a lover of the Harry Potter Universe and a lover of movie going, I was thoroughly disappointed, even angry with this movie. While the visuals are as magical as ever, it's clear that the filmmakers are so distracted by trying to build a franchise that they're forgetting to actually tell a good story! The chemistry between our main four heroes was diluted by so many new characters being introduced. With so many new people and also so many questions for our old heroes, there wasn't enough time for any kind of (explainable) character development or for the viewers to connect with anyone on the screen. The only "character development" with one of our main heroes felt random and out of character and we aren't given much reason or warning for this change. I was also very disappointed with the writing behind Tina's character as her role was demoted from a strong willed Auror and woman to merely a side kick and love interest. Huge and important elements of the story were left for us only to assume what had happened when discussing the one year time jump between the two films (like the Jacob/Queenie relationship, Jacobs memory, etc.). As a whole, the film screamed "money hungry" and "franchise building" rather than letting us really connect with the characters. It also seemed as if they were only adding in twists that would surely get a reaction from viewers despite the fact that they not only discredited the original Harry Potter films, but just felt like unrealistic and a little too convenient! In short, as a huge fan of the Harry Potter Universe, I was disappointed, upset and felt really let down, and as a film goer, I was confused with the plot and frustrated with the lack of character connection and development! The only reason I have given a 4/10 instead of a 1 is for Eddie Redmayne's perfect execution of the shy, socially awkward but loveable and charming Newt Scamander and for the alluring performance from Jude Law's Dumbledore who leaves us wanting to know more of his history! But in the end, it was a huge disappointment as a stand-alone movie.
The movie was entertaining and visually stunning. It was nice to see Newt and co. again, however the two standout performances were from Johnny Depp and Jude Law as Grindelwald and Dumbledore. Well rounded in well played. The special effects were very captivating. 7/10 because the movie gave me what I came for, I was entertained for two hours but I was not blown away.
Watching this gives you the sense that nobody really knew where to go after the first film ended... and it shows. Beautiful film with a great cast, but an ultimately pointless story that sort of flops around like a dead fish not quite aware yet that its dead. This film is disappointing and forgettable.
The special effects were great as was the scenery, however the movie was disjointed and did not flow. It seemed to jump from one special effect to the next and following the plot was tedious to the point of total boredom.
¿Sabías que…?
- TriviaJohnny Depp signed on without reading a script. He wanted to be a part of the series because he is a self-proclaimed massive fan of the series.
- ErroresAccording to the books and Pottermore.com (site created by JK Rowling herself), Minerva McGonagall was born in 1935 and first started teaching at Hogwarts in 1956, when she was 21 years old. Even though the movie is set in 1927, eight years before her birth, she appears as a young professor in Hogwarts.
- Citas
Leta Lestrange: Oh, Newt. You never met a monster you couldn't love.
- Créditos curiososThere are no mid- or end-credit scenes.
- Versiones alternativasAn extended cut runs ~7 minutes longer.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y agrega a la lista de videos para obtener recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idiomas
- También se conoce como
- Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald
- Locaciones de filmación
- Lacock Abbey, Lacock, Chippenham, Wiltshire, Inglaterra, Reino Unido(Hogwarts School)
- Productoras
- Ver más créditos de la compañía en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- USD 200,000,000 (estimado)
- Total en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 159,555,901
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- USD 62,163,104
- 18 nov 2018
- Total a nivel mundial
- USD 655,755,901
- Tiempo de ejecución
- 2h 14min(134 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugiere una edición o agrega el contenido que falta