[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario de lanzamientosLas 250 mejores películasPelículas más popularesExplorar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y ticketsNoticias sobre películasNoticias destacadas sobre películas de la India
    Qué hay en la TV y en streamingLas 250 mejores seriesProgramas de televisión más popularesExplorar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    ¿Qué verÚltimos tráileresOriginales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthPremios STARmeterCentral de premiosCentral de festivalesTodos los eventos
    Personas nacidas hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias de famosos
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de seguimiento
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar la aplicación

diamarkin

Se unió el abr 2013
Te damos la bienvenida a el nuevo perfil
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Guía de ayuda.

Distintivos2

Para obtener información sobre cómo conseguir distintivos, visita página de ayuda sobre distintivos.
Explora los distintivos

Calificaciones105

Calificación de diamarkin
El asombroso Mauricio
6,27
El asombroso Mauricio
Dune
8,05
Dune
Prison Break
8,35
Prison Break
Cómo conocí a vuestra madre
8,35
Cómo conocí a vuestra madre
Dos hombres y medio
7,14
Dos hombres y medio
Uno para todas
7,52
Uno para todas
Agentes de S.H.I.E.L.D.
7,56
Agentes de S.H.I.E.L.D.
Laverne y Shirley
7,04
Laverne y Shirley
Counterpart
8,04
Counterpart
La canción de July
7,36
La canción de July
Killing Eve
8,15
Killing Eve
El hombre en el castillo
7,94
El hombre en el castillo
Hawai 5.0
7,47
Hawai 5.0
Arma letal
7,85
Arma letal
Homecoming
7,44
Homecoming
Sherlock
9,07
Sherlock
Bull
7,17
Bull
The Gifted: Los elegidos
7,26
The Gifted: Los elegidos
FBI
7,16
FBI
Crónicas vampíricas
7,75
Crónicas vampíricas
Blindspot
7,35
Blindspot
The Blacklist
7,98
The Blacklist
The Rookie
8,07
The Rookie
God Friended Me
7,05
God Friended Me
House of Cards
8,67
House of Cards

Comentarios4

Calificación de diamarkin
Dune

Dune

8,0
5
  • 22 oct 2021
  • Read the book(s) or be lost super fast!

    As with every other attempt to bring this book to the screen, if you haven't read the book(s) you'll be lost very quickly. It's mainly set on a desert planet, so most of the scenery is stark and super dusty. It uses terms like Gom Jabbar, Kwisatz Haderach, Shai halud & Bene Gesserit. Hard enough to remember when you read the books and loved them, almost impossible to catch in this movie which when all is said and done... is really just one long setup for sequels. Almost no character development with only two standout actors in it - neither of which plays Paul Atriedes.
    Animales fantásticos: Los crímenes de Grindelwald

    Animales fantásticos: Los crímenes de Grindelwald

    6,5
    6
  • 16 dic 2018
  • Phoning in a setup for next franchise installment

    I'll keep this fairly blunt. Johhny Depp was a mistake for 2 reasons.1. He phones it in! Even the cgi animals act him off the screen.. and they are ridiculously absent for the vast majority of this movie. He's about as emotive as a brain-dead sea anemone & can't decide on an accent - which he mumbles whenever he lands on one in the moment. 2. His Look/Costume...It's shocking - I can almost understand the logic that dictated his look being stark and blonde - almost, but he can't pull it off. There's nothing malevolent about him. I could go on about the bland but let's talk about everyone else. The two romance sub plots have huge holes in them and are barely given a nod within the movie. The search for a mother sub plot is also very thin, and I have to really question as to why 'Fantastic Beasts' was even included in the title, because the beasts rarely were included in the movie.

    I am an avid admirer of J k Rowlings work, and I am very happy to re-watch the first in this series many many times, but this one needed way more of her magic to justify my ever bothering with it again.
    Aniquilación

    Aniquilación

    6,8
    2
  • 2 abr 2018
  • Everything wrong with this movie except the CGI & photography

    On a very basic level this movie has no real story line, no continuity and no common sense. It's stated early on that military groups have been sent in and disappeared - so of course you send in a group of untrained females - at least a couple of whom are emotionally broken. They suspect the "phenomenon" is biological - so of course they don't take hazmat suits, or even breathing filters. Immediately upon entering the Shimmer they wake up in their tents which are placed unreasonably far from each other and state they have lost several days...then nothing else is said or done about that missing time. They are not at all worried about their inability to communicate to the outside. With no idea of the dangers they are facing, THEY SPLIT UP constantly and of course - get into trouble. Even after they're aware of some of the potential dangers - they settle down to sleep in unfortified structures, and set no sentry watches.

    All of this set me up to nit pick within the first 30 mins of the film and there were a plethora of nits requiring serious picking. Banal acting, shocking plot holes, too much money spent on CGI and not enough on decent script writing. It's been said before, but the ending of this movie was prime evidence of the screenwriter falling into a coma and I found the entire movie a gigantic yawn fest.
    Ver todas las reseñas

    Encuestas realizadas recientemente

    3encuestas realizadas en total
    Serious Actors in Funny Roles
    Realizadas en 6 dic 2020
    Russell Crowe and Ryan Gosling in Dos buenos tipos (2016)
    Fall 2016 Returning TV Premieres: Sept. 23-Oct. 21
    Realizadas en 27 sept 2016
    Tim Allen and Nancy Travis in Uno para todas (2011)
    Favorite cameo on Big Bang Theory?
    Realizadas en 2 oct 2013
    Summer Glau in Terminator: Las crónicas de Sarah Connor (2008)

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación IMDb
    Inicia sesión para tener más accesoInicia sesión para tener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Anuncios
    • Empleos
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una empresa de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.