steeleronaldr
Se unió el nov 2013
Te damos la bienvenida a el nuevo perfil
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos3
Para obtener información sobre cómo conseguir distintivos, visita página de ayuda sobre distintivos.
Comentarios220
Calificación de steeleronaldr
This was actually better than I expected it to be. It's not a mystery, we know who and why. It's not a porn movie so if you expect to see male full frontal you're gonna be very upset. It's also not about who's who but about power and greed. It states that it's based on a actual event. Based on and inspired are close in terms of factual movies. They make it as close as possible without causing any legal issues. They add just enough to get the story told without stepping on anyone's toes.
Christian Slater was actually very good and I almost didn't recognize Molly Ringwald she really improved as an actress.
One of the things that hurts the movie is James Franco, he seemed to either over act or under act. The rest of the cast actually holds there own. I was pretty impressed with the gpimgs on in the porn industry and it is all about looks, size of the pole and how good they perform not only in bed but with other men.
What i love Best is this movie moves at a good pace and doesn't allow itself to deliver filler. Now I do remember this case just didn't follow through with it. Bottom line is it's better than the average gay themed movie.
Christian Slater was actually very good and I almost didn't recognize Molly Ringwald she really improved as an actress.
One of the things that hurts the movie is James Franco, he seemed to either over act or under act. The rest of the cast actually holds there own. I was pretty impressed with the gpimgs on in the porn industry and it is all about looks, size of the pole and how good they perform not only in bed but with other men.
What i love Best is this movie moves at a good pace and doesn't allow itself to deliver filler. Now I do remember this case just didn't follow through with it. Bottom line is it's better than the average gay themed movie.
This movie (good I may say myself) though it suffers from the greatest entertainment plaque and that is the sequel. The first one "Twister" was a fun movie that had all likeable characters. I wasn't a Philip Seymour Hoffman fan but he was grand in it. The chemistry between the entire cast was off the charts.
This movie just doesn't compare and is what they wanted, a stand alone sequel. This movie does lack a few things that shows big time and they are.
1. Star power - not saying Glen Powell isn't a big star, he is and shines in supporting roles. He was most likely hoping this movie would be his breakout role. It probably could have had it not been for the new "Deadpool Vs Wolverine" movie that was released on the same weekend that has done broken the billion dollar mark. This movie just wasn't strong enough to compete against it. The only name I noticed other than Powell was Maura Tierney and her role was small. The rest I never heard of. With all that said with the lack of star power it placed too much weight on the newer stars. I don't think that Glen Powell is ready to carry a movie yet. He's still looking for that one big role to come along. You can't use "Maverick: Top Gun" as that was Tom Cruise's movie.
2. Chemistry - this movie definitely lacks chemistry, on top of that none of the characters were likeable. In the first one "Twister" all the main characters were likeable. It's like they all fed off each other but in this one; it just isn't there.
3. For the two lead characters Kate (Daisy Edgar-Jones) and Tyler (Glen Powell) there is barely any inner active scenes together. Because of that it made it hard to root for them.
What the movie has going for it is again definitely CGI, effects and intense scenes of twister action. This movie also has a pretty good story to tell as well.
Now needing to break $400M and as of this post/review is about $67M to go. 200M budget and 200M promotion. I think it'll hit it with very little profit. Is it a good movie, yes, it keeps your attention and it definitely moves. It doesn't seem like a 2 hr movie which is why I give it 8 out of 10 stars. I'll probably even buy it once it comes out. Would I recommend it, well I don't think so but that depends on the person as well.
This movie just doesn't compare and is what they wanted, a stand alone sequel. This movie does lack a few things that shows big time and they are.
1. Star power - not saying Glen Powell isn't a big star, he is and shines in supporting roles. He was most likely hoping this movie would be his breakout role. It probably could have had it not been for the new "Deadpool Vs Wolverine" movie that was released on the same weekend that has done broken the billion dollar mark. This movie just wasn't strong enough to compete against it. The only name I noticed other than Powell was Maura Tierney and her role was small. The rest I never heard of. With all that said with the lack of star power it placed too much weight on the newer stars. I don't think that Glen Powell is ready to carry a movie yet. He's still looking for that one big role to come along. You can't use "Maverick: Top Gun" as that was Tom Cruise's movie.
2. Chemistry - this movie definitely lacks chemistry, on top of that none of the characters were likeable. In the first one "Twister" all the main characters were likeable. It's like they all fed off each other but in this one; it just isn't there.
3. For the two lead characters Kate (Daisy Edgar-Jones) and Tyler (Glen Powell) there is barely any inner active scenes together. Because of that it made it hard to root for them.
What the movie has going for it is again definitely CGI, effects and intense scenes of twister action. This movie also has a pretty good story to tell as well.
Now needing to break $400M and as of this post/review is about $67M to go. 200M budget and 200M promotion. I think it'll hit it with very little profit. Is it a good movie, yes, it keeps your attention and it definitely moves. It doesn't seem like a 2 hr movie which is why I give it 8 out of 10 stars. I'll probably even buy it once it comes out. Would I recommend it, well I don't think so but that depends on the person as well.