Tera-Jones
Se unió el ago 2012
Te damos la bienvenida a el nuevo perfil
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos4
Para obtener información sobre cómo conseguir distintivos, visita página de ayuda sobre distintivos.
Calificaciones2,8 mil
Calificación de Tera-Jones
Comentarios2,4 mil
Calificación de Tera-Jones
Fantastic Voyage (1966)-now this is classic, cerebral, and visually wild '60s sci-fi at its finest. It's part hard science, part psychedelic thrill ride, and part tense survival story... but all wrapped in a sleek, high-concept package that's still respected today.
Here's what you need to know-no spoilers, just the flavor:
Premise Vibe: Take a Cold War-era medical crisis, toss in some high-stakes espionage, and then shrink your entire cast down to the size of a microbe to fix it. That's your setup. It's a race against the clock, and the battlefield is inside the human body. Literal inner space.
Tone: This film treats its concept seriously-not a joke, not campy. You're dealing with military minds, scientists, and a deeply controlled mission full of tension, protocol, and panic when things go wrong (and they do go wrong). There's quiet dread running under the surface, even during the more visually dazzling moments.
Visuals: This is where the film shines. The sets and effects were revolutionary for their time, and even now they feel bold and weirdly beautiful. You'll see glowing membranes, flowing fluids, pulsing arteries-like a surrealist art show inside a biology textbook. It's science fiction with a touch of theatrical grandeur.
Cast: You've got Stephen Boyd, Raquel Welch, Edmond O'Brien, and Donald Pleasence, among others. Strong cast, all playing it dead straight. Welch in particular steals scenes with a mix of sharp poise and that otherworldly 1960s presence.
Pacing: It's measured-deliberate. It's not a rollercoaster, but more of a tension-building dive. The kind of movie where you're holding your breath more often than you realize.
Bottom line?
It's a visually inventive, tightly wound sci-fi film with a serious mind and a surreal style. A true product of its time-when filmmakers still believed audiences could handle bold ideas and slow-burn storytelling in one go.
Watch it like a slow dance into the unknown. It rewards your attention.
Ready to go microscopic?
8.5/10.
Here's what you need to know-no spoilers, just the flavor:
Premise Vibe: Take a Cold War-era medical crisis, toss in some high-stakes espionage, and then shrink your entire cast down to the size of a microbe to fix it. That's your setup. It's a race against the clock, and the battlefield is inside the human body. Literal inner space.
Tone: This film treats its concept seriously-not a joke, not campy. You're dealing with military minds, scientists, and a deeply controlled mission full of tension, protocol, and panic when things go wrong (and they do go wrong). There's quiet dread running under the surface, even during the more visually dazzling moments.
Visuals: This is where the film shines. The sets and effects were revolutionary for their time, and even now they feel bold and weirdly beautiful. You'll see glowing membranes, flowing fluids, pulsing arteries-like a surrealist art show inside a biology textbook. It's science fiction with a touch of theatrical grandeur.
Cast: You've got Stephen Boyd, Raquel Welch, Edmond O'Brien, and Donald Pleasence, among others. Strong cast, all playing it dead straight. Welch in particular steals scenes with a mix of sharp poise and that otherworldly 1960s presence.
Pacing: It's measured-deliberate. It's not a rollercoaster, but more of a tension-building dive. The kind of movie where you're holding your breath more often than you realize.
Bottom line?
It's a visually inventive, tightly wound sci-fi film with a serious mind and a surreal style. A true product of its time-when filmmakers still believed audiences could handle bold ideas and slow-burn storytelling in one go.
Watch it like a slow dance into the unknown. It rewards your attention.
Ready to go microscopic?
8.5/10.
Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea (1961) is pure, high-stakes Cold War-era sci-fi, wrapped in sleek submarines, tense moral questions, and that vintage Irwin Allen flair. It's not about subtlety-it's about big ideas, big danger, and bigger performances.
Here's the lowdown-no spoilers, just the tone and texture:
Setting: The bulk of the film takes place aboard the Seaview, a state-of-the-art, nuclear-powered submarine that looks like it came from a dream half science, half art deco. It's the kind of sub you expect James Mason or Vincent Price to be lurking in-but instead, you get Admiral Harriman Nelson, a man on a mission.
Plot vibe: Classic disaster-meets-science-fiction. There's a global crisis threatening the entire Earth, and the solution may lie deep underwater... or deep in moral ambiguity. The tension is constant-men under pressure, the chain of command being tested, and scientific theory going toe-to-toe with military instinct.
Visuals: For 1961? Impressive. Underwater effects, miniatures, sleek sets-this film is a showcase for what Hollywood could do before CGI. The Seaview itself is a stunner, both inside and out.
Tone: It's serious, dramatic, sometimes even grim. It's not campy like some later Irwin Allen productions. This one plays it straight-big themes like responsibility, authority, and sacrifice, with just enough stylized flair to keep it engaging.
Music: There's a theme song sung by Frankie Avalon (who also appears in the film!), which sets a weirdly mellow mood at first-don't let it fool you. Once the film kicks in, it goes.
Bottom line: If you're into tense submarine drama, Cold War-flavored dilemmas, and sharp-edged sci-fi where people argue about the fate of humanity inside a pressure cooker? This one delivers.
9/10.
Here's the lowdown-no spoilers, just the tone and texture:
Setting: The bulk of the film takes place aboard the Seaview, a state-of-the-art, nuclear-powered submarine that looks like it came from a dream half science, half art deco. It's the kind of sub you expect James Mason or Vincent Price to be lurking in-but instead, you get Admiral Harriman Nelson, a man on a mission.
Plot vibe: Classic disaster-meets-science-fiction. There's a global crisis threatening the entire Earth, and the solution may lie deep underwater... or deep in moral ambiguity. The tension is constant-men under pressure, the chain of command being tested, and scientific theory going toe-to-toe with military instinct.
Visuals: For 1961? Impressive. Underwater effects, miniatures, sleek sets-this film is a showcase for what Hollywood could do before CGI. The Seaview itself is a stunner, both inside and out.
Tone: It's serious, dramatic, sometimes even grim. It's not campy like some later Irwin Allen productions. This one plays it straight-big themes like responsibility, authority, and sacrifice, with just enough stylized flair to keep it engaging.
Music: There's a theme song sung by Frankie Avalon (who also appears in the film!), which sets a weirdly mellow mood at first-don't let it fool you. Once the film kicks in, it goes.
Bottom line: If you're into tense submarine drama, Cold War-flavored dilemmas, and sharp-edged sci-fi where people argue about the fate of humanity inside a pressure cooker? This one delivers.
9/10.
The People That Time Forgot is the direct sequel to The Land That Time Forgot, released in 1977-just a couple years after the original-and it dives right back into the wild prehistoric chaos you just came out of... but with some fresh twists.
Here's the vibe, no spoilers:
It picks up the story with a rescue mission-different perspective, new main characters, but deeply tied to the events of the first film. So you're not just dropped in cold; you've got some emotional investment if you just watched the first one. Smart move watching them back to back.
The tone shifts a bit-it leans more into action-adventure territory, almost like a fantasy war movie meets dinosaur jungle expedition. There's still that classic B-movie charm, but this one feels slightly more pulpy, like it knows it's swinging for fun and not just survival.
New faces, familiar danger-the cast is mostly different, but don't worry, the core spirit is still there: stubborn explorers, hostile terrain, ancient creatures, and just enough mystery to keep the pace moving. You'll get some strong '70s British adventure vibes throughout.
Visually, it keeps that handmade look. Models, matte paintings, rubber-suited warriors-and somehow it all works. It's part of the charm. The effects aren't meant to fool you-they're meant to entertain you.
It's the kind of film that knows what it is: a follow-up thrill ride for fans of dinosaurs, lost civilizations, and men in fur boots wielding swords. If Land was about surviving the unknown, People is about facing it head-on with a little more firepower.
Have fun with it-it doesn't take itself too seriously, and neither should you. Let the lava fly and the prehistoric drama roll!
8/10.
Here's the vibe, no spoilers:
It picks up the story with a rescue mission-different perspective, new main characters, but deeply tied to the events of the first film. So you're not just dropped in cold; you've got some emotional investment if you just watched the first one. Smart move watching them back to back.
The tone shifts a bit-it leans more into action-adventure territory, almost like a fantasy war movie meets dinosaur jungle expedition. There's still that classic B-movie charm, but this one feels slightly more pulpy, like it knows it's swinging for fun and not just survival.
New faces, familiar danger-the cast is mostly different, but don't worry, the core spirit is still there: stubborn explorers, hostile terrain, ancient creatures, and just enough mystery to keep the pace moving. You'll get some strong '70s British adventure vibes throughout.
Visually, it keeps that handmade look. Models, matte paintings, rubber-suited warriors-and somehow it all works. It's part of the charm. The effects aren't meant to fool you-they're meant to entertain you.
It's the kind of film that knows what it is: a follow-up thrill ride for fans of dinosaurs, lost civilizations, and men in fur boots wielding swords. If Land was about surviving the unknown, People is about facing it head-on with a little more firepower.
Have fun with it-it doesn't take itself too seriously, and neither should you. Let the lava fly and the prehistoric drama roll!
8/10.
Encuestas realizadas recientemente
1506encuestas realizadas en total