unkle_weaser
Se unió el jul 2006
Te damos la bienvenida a el nuevo perfil
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Guía de ayuda.
Distintivos2
Para obtener información sobre cómo conseguir distintivos, visita página de ayuda sobre distintivos.
Comentarios6
Calificación de unkle_weaser
I'm a bit of a 1970's and early 1980's gay porn hound. When I heard of two real-life brothers participating in an incestuous relation, I had to see this one. Kip Noll has curly blonde hair and is cute. Scott has straight black hair, and is adorable. Yes, there is open penetration in this one (THANKS, SUPREME COURT!) Scott does "bottom" a bit in this one.There are other actors in this one, but the main draw is to see brothers boning. It has distribution troubles because the music isn't properly licensed. Too bad, this is an excellent example of the genre. I'll give this 9 out of 10 for gay porno. If you're looking for movies with real writing, acting, or quality, maybe 3/10.
I saw this piece of cinematic feces when it first came out. I read John was "challenged" in performing the gay sex scenes.
"Challenged" is a very nice word for it. Holmes has trouble maintaining an erection longer than five minutes. He engages in unprotected anal sex -- not very well at that -- four or five times. He appears to have trouble even showing any enthusiasm for the movie. He didn't need to do this one; John had over 350 porn classics to his name by the time he'd passed on, this was unneeded.
Despite the necessities of the script, Holmes is wearing a sultan's outfit. This was shot on an off day, awful, awful, awful.
Forget the "spoiler" warnings, there isn't anything to spoil.
"Challenged" is a very nice word for it. Holmes has trouble maintaining an erection longer than five minutes. He engages in unprotected anal sex -- not very well at that -- four or five times. He appears to have trouble even showing any enthusiasm for the movie. He didn't need to do this one; John had over 350 porn classics to his name by the time he'd passed on, this was unneeded.
Despite the necessities of the script, Holmes is wearing a sultan's outfit. This was shot on an off day, awful, awful, awful.
Forget the "spoiler" warnings, there isn't anything to spoil.
Actually, I meant TWO second bananas, since James Finlayson has the title role. Snub Pollard, with an upside-down fu-manchu mustache, plays a father trying to put his unruly kids to bed. Finlayson plays Sandwich; jilted by "Priscilly" over John Alldone (Pollard).
You can tell the general quality of the movie by the character's names. A brief (Titled) dialog passage may suffice.
In a snow-covered landscape, some "indians" are teasing the pilgrims about lodging. "Are you going to build a log cabin?" They ask.
"Heck, no!! We're going' to the Biltmore!" the pilgrims respond. Anachronisms abound. Cars, twentieth-century money, even the "indians" costumes come in for fair play. This is what passed for comedy in the '20's. Shaw this isn't.
You can tell the general quality of the movie by the character's names. A brief (Titled) dialog passage may suffice.
In a snow-covered landscape, some "indians" are teasing the pilgrims about lodging. "Are you going to build a log cabin?" They ask.
"Heck, no!! We're going' to the Biltmore!" the pilgrims respond. Anachronisms abound. Cars, twentieth-century money, even the "indians" costumes come in for fair play. This is what passed for comedy in the '20's. Shaw this isn't.