Añade un argumento en tu idiomaA panel of three judges hear court cases, argue the merits of the case amongst themselves, and render a verdict.A panel of three judges hear court cases, argue the merits of the case amongst themselves, and render a verdict.A panel of three judges hear court cases, argue the merits of the case amongst themselves, and render a verdict.
- Premios
- 4 nominaciones en total
Explorar episodios
Reseñas destacadas
First of all, no, I have never been on this show. I love the idea of 3 judges and being able to see their discussion. The problem that I have with this show is Judge Corriero.....he will ALWAYS side with the female, ESPECIALLY if it is a single mom, he sides with anyone who brings in a child, he is so touchy, feely, sing Koombyya that it just turns me off. He needs to get a little tougher...the only time I saw him raise his voice was at a man who he felt took advantage of a female....without letting the guy give his side of the story. He needs to go...on the opposite end, the two female judges have more moxy than Corriero...they see right through the liars where Corriero does not.
It realY BOTHERS Judge Corriero wnthen an achild is suing aparent. He believes that it is wron to sue a parent or grandparent . He should leave the show because he doesnt think parents can be at fault. His concern is old fashioned Italian family structure.
Today's episode was the last straw!! I agree that Judges Acker & Dimango have their moments but Judge Corriero totally disregards the facts in the case and makes up new ones. A young Lyft driver sued a woman for literally pulling out of a spot right into his car. She claimed to be parallel parking but clearly she was pulling out. Of course, no insurance!!! Since the plaintiff stated he didn't see her, Judge C took that to mean she was parking rather then the more logical she was pulling out. I don't know about you but I assume parked cars are staying that way. He is such a bleeding heart that it makes it impossible to enjoy the program. Time to hang up the robe!!!
Regardless of the case facts, Judge Corriere favors the women over men, and if the
plaintiff and defendant are both
women, then if it's a black woman over white, the white woman will lose. Try my theory and see.
Then Judge Acker is all about race, and usually favors the black However, she is very good
about getting to the basics about the case. Acker&Demango both are good at what they do.
Judge Demango, I view as the centrist in this trio and has her
head on straight. She follows case law regardless of gender
or race. Which is the way a judge should handle their cases. She represents the show
very well. Hats off to her.
My husband and I actually like this program more than Judge Judy. Part of the reason is because it's interesting to have the different judges ask their respective questions of the plaintiffs and defendants, plus it's fun to listen to them deliberate behind closed doors. They're fun personalities, too, although sometimes they get serious and scold the people who are before them. What's really fascinating is that some people go in, only asking for small amounts of money. What's up with that? Are they only interested in being on TV? Whatever.. it's really interesting to see what kinds of situations people can get themselves into.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesPatricia is a retired New York City supreme court judge. Tanya & Larry are lawyers.
- ConexionesSpoofed in Saturday Night Live: Emma Thompson/Jonas Brothers (2019)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How many seasons does Hot Bench have?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was Hot Bench (2014) officially released in Canada in English?
Responde