En un futuro próximo distópico, las leyes de La Ciudad exigen que los solteros sean llevados al Hotel, donde deberán encontrar pareja en un plazo de cuarenta y cinco días. De no hacerlo así,... Leer todoEn un futuro próximo distópico, las leyes de La Ciudad exigen que los solteros sean llevados al Hotel, donde deberán encontrar pareja en un plazo de cuarenta y cinco días. De no hacerlo así, los convertirán en bestias y los expulsarán al Bosque.En un futuro próximo distópico, las leyes de La Ciudad exigen que los solteros sean llevados al Hotel, donde deberán encontrar pareja en un plazo de cuarenta y cinco días. De no hacerlo así, los convertirán en bestias y los expulsarán al Bosque.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Nominado para 1 premio Óscar
- 33 premios y 84 nominaciones en total
- Guard Waiter
- (as Sean Duggan)
Reseñas destacadas
The concept is cleverly constructed so that it is weirdly convincing despite its utter absurdity. Within this the film satirizes relationships, singles – in particular the extremes of those two situations. The push for companionship, with its common ground, and its rituals, and the digs at elements of life such as children distracting from conflict. Perhaps it hit a bit too close to home with its regimented rituals, and awkward neediness. On the other side the extreme version of singlehood is also dug at once we are in the woods. It is not as clever as some would tell you, nor as smart, but it is certainly interesting, darkly funny, and pretty engaging throughout. It doesn't pull it off totally, but I enjoyed it from start to finish – its oddity runs through from the ideas, the performances, down into the specific dialogue. Having such a great cast helps, but the tightness of creative vision throughout is what holds it all together. As odd and slightly unsuccessful as it is, it is still well worth watching.
I personally enjoyed the movie, but I can't say that its unique style was really my thing.
The first part of the film is amusing, quirky and entertaining. The style is pleasant and interesting, despite some nasty moments. Some of the shots drag a little, but it adds to the curious atmosphere. The dry, deadpan dialogue is perfectly delivered, Colin Farrell as the main protagonist shows he really is a fine actor.
Then the film changes. New characters are introduced and the mood becomes much bleaker. No longer is this humorous, the stakes have changed. It is hard to identify with the new characters as we had already invested emotion in the earlier ones. And it gets worse, leading to en ending that is as unclear as it is unpleasant.
The Lobster cannot seem to make up its mind what kind of a film it is, is it simply saying that we are all venal and craven in the end? If so, why the humour at the beginning? And if we are capable of love, is it really so shallow as to be broken by people saying things?
I loved the beginning, I didn't like the end. This was one fish dish that left a bad taste.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThe production worked almost entirely with natural light and without makeup. Lighting was only used for some night scenes.
- PifiasWhen the heartless woman is escorting David out of their room, she clearly has blood splatters on the backside of her calf. As she chases David through the halls, the blood on the back of her calf disappears. When David shoots her with the tranquilizer in the back, the blood has reappeared on her calf.
- Citas
Loner Leader: We dance alone. That's why we only play electronic music.
- Banda sonoraString Quartet in F Major, Op. 18, No. 1; II Adagio Affetuoso Ed Appasionato
Written by Ludwig van Beethoven
Performed by Juilliard String Quartet
Courtesy of Sony Music Entertainment Inc
Selecciones populares
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 4.000.000 € (estimación)
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 9.077.245 US$
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- 190.252 US$
- 15 may 2016
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 17.581.104 US$
- Duración
- 1h 59min(119 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1