El sexo me llevó a urgencias

The patients are su to be playing themselves, same for the doctors. This is fake because I looked a lot of them up. ALL of casts are actors, why lie and say these are the real people. This series is so stupid let's just say it's not even in reality tvform. Bad acting, silly stories seems like something kids put together.

I noticed some of the reviews here addressed to repetitive nature of the flashbacks in the episodes. However if you get up to grab a beer or go potty or wash a couple dishes you won't miss a thing!

Candles rocking, headboards knocking, paintings swinging, photos & Knick knacks falling off of shelves... that's my favorite part of the show! These cautionary tales bring a new meaning to safe sex. We just keep it in the bedroom.

I understand that there will be commercials but there are way too many. On top of that, when the commercial break is over they repeat what I have already seen at least two to three times on each story. Most people will not forget what just happened 10 minutes earlier. The show is interesting but they switch back and forth between cases. I would like it better if they would just film one story at a time and quit repeating just to use up air time. They should put more substance in it. If they would, I would definitely raise the ratings. I am a great fan of Untold Stories of the E.R., Moonshiners and Say Yes To The dress.

I saw this show only once, and although the premise seems interesting and entertaining, I won't likely watch again. It's too painful seeing the same segments of video repeated over and over ad nauseum with perhaps an added 10-15 seconds of each story tacked onto the end each time the primary 2-3 minute segment is repeated. I don't get this editing style. If it actually gains viewers then more power to the editors, but it's losing me. I found myself continuously changing channels to find something more interesting when another repeat would start, coming back after a few minutes to see if the story had been advanced any. Often it hadn't.

A previous reviewer claimed it's not the editor's fault, but it's definitely the editing. If it's by request of the network then the blame may lie there, but it's the editing - perhaps requested by the network - that is likely to be the downfall of this program.