The Pet Detective
- 2025
- 2h 10min
PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
6,6/10
2,4 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Añade un argumento en tu idiomaMotivated to win the hand of his sweetheart, Kaikeyi, Tony Jose Alula joins his father's detective agency. Starting as a 'Pet Detective', Tony's cases quickly escalate into a dangerous kidna... Leer todoMotivated to win the hand of his sweetheart, Kaikeyi, Tony Jose Alula joins his father's detective agency. Starting as a 'Pet Detective', Tony's cases quickly escalate into a dangerous kidnapping involving international smugglers.Motivated to win the hand of his sweetheart, Kaikeyi, Tony Jose Alula joins his father's detective agency. Starting as a 'Pet Detective', Tony's cases quickly escalate into a dangerous kidnapping involving international smugglers.
- Director/a
- Guionistas
- Estrellas
- Director/a
- Guionistas
- Todo el reparto y equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Reseñas destacadas
The Pet Detective is a complete non-serious, fun entertainer made just to make you laugh for a couple of hours. From the very beginning, the movie moves like a comic book - with over-the-top characters, colorful situations, and quick, funny dialogues that sound like playful counters. The first half keeps jumping from one funny event to another, keeping the energy high even though nothing feels too serious.
The treatment of the film clearly feels aimed at kids. By the second half, the movie becomes even more childish, which might feel a bit annoying for adults. The climax brings all the subplots together in a big chaotic comedy scene, where every character ends up in a wild fight full of confusion and slapstick moments. Personally, that part felt too silly to enjoy fully.
Overall, The Pet Detective works best as a simple, mindless comedy for kids or for anyone looking to pass some time without thinking much. It's a slapstick, chaotic ride - fun in parts, forgettable in the end.
The treatment of the film clearly feels aimed at kids. By the second half, the movie becomes even more childish, which might feel a bit annoying for adults. The climax brings all the subplots together in a big chaotic comedy scene, where every character ends up in a wild fight full of confusion and slapstick moments. Personally, that part felt too silly to enjoy fully.
Overall, The Pet Detective works best as a simple, mindless comedy for kids or for anyone looking to pass some time without thinking much. It's a slapstick, chaotic ride - fun in parts, forgettable in the end.
I don't get it. I JUST DON'T. It has some sporadic laughs, but most of the one-liners miss the mark by a mile (..and can be classified under the ayye, chali category). Again, I'm seeing mediocre, forgettable stuff like this being branded as a "laugh riot" like Marana Mass and Guruvayoor Ambalanadayil (both of which I found lacking) in recent times. All I can see is an attempt at recreating a comedy of errors reminiscent of early Siddique Lal and Priyadarshan films, though I'd say it's largely unsuccessful. A lot of characters and subplots exist only to make it seem like one big Tom & Jerry-esque cartoon situation, with everyone arriving at a single location in the finale. The Wonderla stretch was all kinds of badly executed writing / filmmaking. Rajesh Murugesan's score is fun in parts, but I'm surprised how Abhinav's cuts kinda ruin this film, losing all sense of narrative cohesion towards the end. Anend C Chandran's frames don't really stand out for the first time in forever.
Sharaf is a naturally funny actor, but aside from some scenes in the beginning, I feel he was "trying to be funny." Anupama is just sort of there (but seeing her is always nice, so there's that). Joemon Jyothir is such a hit-and-miss performer (..liked him in Vyasanasametham Bandhumithradhikal, despised him in Guruvayoor Ambalanadayil), I found him quite irritating in this. The supporting cast, comprising names such as Vinay Forrt, Vijayaraghavan, Vinayakan, Shyam Mohan, Praseetha, and Renji Panicker, also underdeliver. That's a shame. I dunno, I found this part Premam reunion to be underwhelming overall, with very few things to write home about.
Sharaf is a naturally funny actor, but aside from some scenes in the beginning, I feel he was "trying to be funny." Anupama is just sort of there (but seeing her is always nice, so there's that). Joemon Jyothir is such a hit-and-miss performer (..liked him in Vyasanasametham Bandhumithradhikal, despised him in Guruvayoor Ambalanadayil), I found him quite irritating in this. The supporting cast, comprising names such as Vinay Forrt, Vijayaraghavan, Vinayakan, Shyam Mohan, Praseetha, and Renji Panicker, also underdeliver. That's a shame. I dunno, I found this part Premam reunion to be underwhelming overall, with very few things to write home about.
I had to use a title like this because I watched the film after hearing many people say, 'a film like CID Moosa.' In a film that is claimed to be a comedy, I only burst out laughing in a total of five instances.
The theater was almost houseful. However, no one apart from me laughed or clapped in that theater. The truth is, when I was the only one who clapped for some joke, the person who came with me even told me to stop. Yet, because I have a habit of clapping when I find something good, I laughed and clapped for the subsequent (awaited and received) 2-3 moments that I felt were jokes. I am a person who wholeheartedly laughs out loud and claps for my own joy, even for average jokes; and yet, this film didn't make me feel like laughing much.
The film had a reasonably good plot. However, the totally jumbled and confusing screenplay felt like it dragged the entire film down. Many of the jokes that appeared in the first half felt forcibly inserted and inappropriate for the situation. The dialogue delivery and the slowness in the presentation seemed to be the reasons why some of the jokes didn't work for me.
The film heavily struggled to make the climax resemble those in 90s movies, but the overly prolonged climax felt personally very bad to me; perhaps this feeling arose because I have watched many such good climaxes that can make one laugh a lot, even without logic. It felt like the screenplay was developed without much effort or serious research. After finishing the movie, I felt the writing was even worse than some small short films by beginners.
The cinematography, one could say, was the best among the lot. The color grading seemed suitable for this film.
If the editing had been given a little more attention, the rhythm of the film itself would have been different, and some of the comedies might have worked better. Honestly, the trailer cut was beautiful. That was the main factor that motivated me to go into the film. Some of the songs were unbearable, and the background music also felt average.
Sharaf U Dheen is a good actor; his movie Madhura Manohara Moham, for example, was a film I watched in the theater and laughed a lot at. I also really liked his 'mass' performance in Padakkalam. But when it comes to this film, the truth is that many of the comedies didn't feel like comedy, and many of the mass scenes didn't feel like mass scenes.
Anupama Parameswaran's comedic performances also felt below average. I did not like Vinay Forrt's performance at all; it felt very over-the-top, and the jokes did not evoke any laughter. A psycho villain was shown, but ultimately, that plot line was not given a good conclusion. There is a development in the character of an auto-driver; initially, it felt interesting, but by the climax, it felt like that too was ended somehow, without showing a proper reason.
In short, it seems that the only reason this movie currently gets this much support is because of the affection for Sharaf U Dheen and the hype created by social media: there is a high possibility that opinions will change a lot when it arrives on OTT.
Nalla cinemakal undaavatte!
The theater was almost houseful. However, no one apart from me laughed or clapped in that theater. The truth is, when I was the only one who clapped for some joke, the person who came with me even told me to stop. Yet, because I have a habit of clapping when I find something good, I laughed and clapped for the subsequent (awaited and received) 2-3 moments that I felt were jokes. I am a person who wholeheartedly laughs out loud and claps for my own joy, even for average jokes; and yet, this film didn't make me feel like laughing much.
The film had a reasonably good plot. However, the totally jumbled and confusing screenplay felt like it dragged the entire film down. Many of the jokes that appeared in the first half felt forcibly inserted and inappropriate for the situation. The dialogue delivery and the slowness in the presentation seemed to be the reasons why some of the jokes didn't work for me.
The film heavily struggled to make the climax resemble those in 90s movies, but the overly prolonged climax felt personally very bad to me; perhaps this feeling arose because I have watched many such good climaxes that can make one laugh a lot, even without logic. It felt like the screenplay was developed without much effort or serious research. After finishing the movie, I felt the writing was even worse than some small short films by beginners.
The cinematography, one could say, was the best among the lot. The color grading seemed suitable for this film.
If the editing had been given a little more attention, the rhythm of the film itself would have been different, and some of the comedies might have worked better. Honestly, the trailer cut was beautiful. That was the main factor that motivated me to go into the film. Some of the songs were unbearable, and the background music also felt average.
Sharaf U Dheen is a good actor; his movie Madhura Manohara Moham, for example, was a film I watched in the theater and laughed a lot at. I also really liked his 'mass' performance in Padakkalam. But when it comes to this film, the truth is that many of the comedies didn't feel like comedy, and many of the mass scenes didn't feel like mass scenes.
Anupama Parameswaran's comedic performances also felt below average. I did not like Vinay Forrt's performance at all; it felt very over-the-top, and the jokes did not evoke any laughter. A psycho villain was shown, but ultimately, that plot line was not given a good conclusion. There is a development in the character of an auto-driver; initially, it felt interesting, but by the climax, it felt like that too was ended somehow, without showing a proper reason.
In short, it seems that the only reason this movie currently gets this much support is because of the affection for Sharaf U Dheen and the hype created by social media: there is a high possibility that opinions will change a lot when it arrives on OTT.
Nalla cinemakal undaavatte!
Rating - 3.5/5
A fun adventurous ride cooked on a comical and colourful template with eventful instances.
The story takes us through the life of a Pet Detective who cross paths with criminal syndicates over his quest for winning his lady love and the extraordinary events in the backdrop forms the crux of the story.
Praneesh & Jai Vishnu has cooked a flavourful cinematic meal with slapstick elements, cat & mouse play to keep the viewers entertained on screen. They have brought out a mediocre story but the presentation was really impressive like visualising a colourful detective novel in mind. The first half pulls out many characters to the story which joins it's dot together in the final half. The climax sequences were absolutely a fun laughter ride.
Impressive performance by SharafUdheen handling action & humour so effortlessly. Anupama has given a decent performance but their combo and dialogues felt bit cringy in few sequences. Good performances by Joemon, Vijayaraghavan,Renji Panicker, Praseetha, Nishanth Sagar, Vinayakan & Shobi Thilakan who just synced with the vibe of the story.
Good sense of music by Rajesh Murugesan matching the mood and template designed for the movie precisely captured by Anend and perfectly trimmed by Abhinav keeping the pace of the story intact. Great contributions from Production Designer Dino Shankar, Sound design by Vishnu Govind, Costumes by Gayathri Kishore and colour grading by Srik Varier.
A perfect fun to watch entertainer to be experienced on theatres with tiny tots.
A fun adventurous ride cooked on a comical and colourful template with eventful instances.
The story takes us through the life of a Pet Detective who cross paths with criminal syndicates over his quest for winning his lady love and the extraordinary events in the backdrop forms the crux of the story.
Praneesh & Jai Vishnu has cooked a flavourful cinematic meal with slapstick elements, cat & mouse play to keep the viewers entertained on screen. They have brought out a mediocre story but the presentation was really impressive like visualising a colourful detective novel in mind. The first half pulls out many characters to the story which joins it's dot together in the final half. The climax sequences were absolutely a fun laughter ride.
Impressive performance by SharafUdheen handling action & humour so effortlessly. Anupama has given a decent performance but their combo and dialogues felt bit cringy in few sequences. Good performances by Joemon, Vijayaraghavan,Renji Panicker, Praseetha, Nishanth Sagar, Vinayakan & Shobi Thilakan who just synced with the vibe of the story.
Good sense of music by Rajesh Murugesan matching the mood and template designed for the movie precisely captured by Anend and perfectly trimmed by Abhinav keeping the pace of the story intact. Great contributions from Production Designer Dino Shankar, Sound design by Vishnu Govind, Costumes by Gayathri Kishore and colour grading by Srik Varier.
A perfect fun to watch entertainer to be experienced on theatres with tiny tots.
A fun movie to watch , didn't like the colour and movie looks dark all the time.there are some moments which makes you laugh and some plot twists are predictable and some are very nice , recommend family thriller , the first half feels slow the movie sets up slowly, but when it paces up you can't stop watching.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
Taquilla
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 386.221 US$
- Duración
- 2h 10min(130 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.90:1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta






