Cuando su malvado enemigo resurge después de 16 años, una banda de exrevolucionarios se reúne para rescatar a la hija de uno de los suyos.Cuando su malvado enemigo resurge después de 16 años, una banda de exrevolucionarios se reúne para rescatar a la hija de uno de los suyos.Cuando su malvado enemigo resurge después de 16 años, una banda de exrevolucionarios se reúne para rescatar a la hija de uno de los suyos.
- Director/a
- Guionistas
- Estrellas
- Premios
- 141 premios y 317 nominaciones en total
Dijon Duenas
- Talleyrand
- (as Dijon)
Brooklyn Demme
- Sober Rick
- (as Brooklyn Trueheart Demme)
- Director/a
- Guionistas
- Todo el reparto y equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Resumen
Reviewers say 'One Battle After Another' is a groundbreaking cinematic experience with ambitious style, strong performances, and complex themes of resistance and rebellion. Many praise the film's political commentary, dark humor, and thrilling action sequences. Paul Thomas Anderson's direction receives high praise, as well as the film's cinematography, soundtrack, and innovative use of VistaVision. However, some criticize its disjointed pacing, underdeveloped characters, and tonal inconsistencies. Overall, it's celebrated as a bold, thought-provoking, cinematic experience.
Reseñas destacadas
Granted it's good, and I like most of PTA's films, but it's not like this is anywhere near as brilliant as something like There Will Be Blood or The Master.
The plot is very simple, and while that's not a bad thing, I found it difficult finding anything substantial to grab onto. The performances are certainly good but again it feels like all the actors with the exception of probably Chase Infiniti and maybe Sean Penn aren't given a whole lot to do.
In my opinion this was far less interestingly photographed than something like Phantom Thread, and with less compelling characters than something like The Master, and lacked the spectacle and gravitas of something like There Will Be Blood.
Still better than most films releasing these days, but if you're looking at all the rave reviews like I was and expecting a masterpiece, from my perspective I'd be lowering my expectations.
It gets a 7/10 for being well performed and pretty well written, but I can't go beyond that because it lacked the depth I'd normally be seeking from filmmakers of PTA's caliber.
The plot is very simple, and while that's not a bad thing, I found it difficult finding anything substantial to grab onto. The performances are certainly good but again it feels like all the actors with the exception of probably Chase Infiniti and maybe Sean Penn aren't given a whole lot to do.
In my opinion this was far less interestingly photographed than something like Phantom Thread, and with less compelling characters than something like The Master, and lacked the spectacle and gravitas of something like There Will Be Blood.
Still better than most films releasing these days, but if you're looking at all the rave reviews like I was and expecting a masterpiece, from my perspective I'd be lowering my expectations.
It gets a 7/10 for being well performed and pretty well written, but I can't go beyond that because it lacked the depth I'd normally be seeking from filmmakers of PTA's caliber.
Battle after another is a solid film with a lot of strong points. It's generally warm and even has a bit of light raunchiness at the start, yet it keeps you engaged. Leonardo DiCaprio's performance is outstanding-he plays an ordinary guy thrown into tough situations with incredible sincerity and conviction. Benicio Del Toro, though in a smaller role, adds charisma as well. The female characters, unfortunately, feel pretty shallow and lack depth.
The plot is simple but enjoyable, though there are minor logical gaps. The main downside is the antagonists: some feel too overpowered, while others seem weak, and the motives of many minor villains remain unclear. At times, their actions come off as clichéd, which slightly reduces the dramatic tension.
Overall, the film works really well-it's fresh, engaging, and visually impressive. It reminded me of Fargo, both the film and the series. If you like Leonardo DiCaprio or the Coen brothers, this movie is definitely worth watching.
The plot is simple but enjoyable, though there are minor logical gaps. The main downside is the antagonists: some feel too overpowered, while others seem weak, and the motives of many minor villains remain unclear. At times, their actions come off as clichéd, which slightly reduces the dramatic tension.
Overall, the film works really well-it's fresh, engaging, and visually impressive. It reminded me of Fargo, both the film and the series. If you like Leonardo DiCaprio or the Coen brothers, this movie is definitely worth watching.
Would recommend:) entertaining, might be one of the best movies I've seen in this year.
Very good movie.
Good acting.
Amazing actors.
Funny.
Leo just don't disappoint.
So go watch this movie and you will not be disappointed I've haven't seen a good crime movie in a long time.
I have nothing more to say just go watch it.
Very good movie.
Good acting.
Amazing actors.
Funny.
Leo just don't disappoint.
So go watch this movie and you will not be disappointed I've haven't seen a good crime movie in a long time.
I have nothing more to say just go watch it.
The film kept my attention and I genuinely enjoyed watching it, but I walked away feeling like something was missing. I'm still not sure why critics are so ecstatic about it - it's a solid piece of work, just not exceptional in the way the reviews suggest. I don't regret the time spent, yet I don't feel any desire to rewatch it either.
Paul Thomas Anderson's One Battle After Another is a film that wants to be epic but ends up didactic. There's no denying its technical accomplishments: the cinematography is vivid, almost painterly at times, and Leonardo DiCaprio and Sean Penn deliver performances that are magnetic, commanding your attention even when the story falters.
And falter it does. The film's ambition - to comment on political extremism - is undercut by its simplistic moral universe. One side of the conflict is portrayed as entirely evil, with no redeeming qualities or relatability. Every action they take is chaotic, violent, or manipulative, leaving the audience with no one to sympathize with on that side. This lack of nuance turns the movie from a story into a political lecture, making it feel less like cinema and more like ideological instruction.
In a moment when America feels more divided than ever, the timing of such a film is jarring. Its portrayal of chaos and extremism is so stark that it risks being taken too seriously by audiences at either extreme, rather than prompting reflection. More troublingly, it underscores how out of touch Hollywood can be with most Americans, presenting a world of ideological extremes that few viewers would recognize in real life.
Still, the film isn't without merit. Anderson's eye for detail, his visual inventiveness, and the sheer force of DiCaprio and Penn's performances make it watchable even when it preaches. But for a director capable of deep, character-driven storytelling, this attempt at political commentary feels like a missed opportunity.
And falter it does. The film's ambition - to comment on political extremism - is undercut by its simplistic moral universe. One side of the conflict is portrayed as entirely evil, with no redeeming qualities or relatability. Every action they take is chaotic, violent, or manipulative, leaving the audience with no one to sympathize with on that side. This lack of nuance turns the movie from a story into a political lecture, making it feel less like cinema and more like ideological instruction.
In a moment when America feels more divided than ever, the timing of such a film is jarring. Its portrayal of chaos and extremism is so stark that it risks being taken too seriously by audiences at either extreme, rather than prompting reflection. More troublingly, it underscores how out of touch Hollywood can be with most Americans, presenting a world of ideological extremes that few viewers would recognize in real life.
Still, the film isn't without merit. Anderson's eye for detail, his visual inventiveness, and the sheer force of DiCaprio and Penn's performances make it watchable even when it preaches. But for a director capable of deep, character-driven storytelling, this attempt at political commentary feels like a missed opportunity.
Most Popular Movies of 2025: #4 One Battle After Another
Discover the most popular movies, series, and stars on IMDb in 2025
Banda sonora
Obtén una vista previa de la banda sonora aquí y continúa escuchándola en Amazon Music.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesLockjaw's second-in-command and chief interrogator, Danvers, is played by a non-professional actor: James 'Jim' Raterman, a security consultant and former HSI Special Agent.
- PifiasBob keeps a 1G phone for security purposes. 1G networks were all phased out in the US in the early 2000s. The phones would not work in any era that also had iPhones.
- Citas
Col. Steven J. Lockjaw: I believe she was a sperm thief.
Sandy Irvine: A semen demon.
- Créditos adicionalesAt the end of the credits there is a dedication to producer and assistant director Adam Somner with a photo and sound from a set.
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idiomas
- Títulos en diferentes países
- One Battle After Another
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 130.000.000 US$ (estimación)
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 71.468.736 US$
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- 22.000.387 US$
- 28 sept 2025
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 205.168.736 US$
- Duración
- 2h 41min(161 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta






