Spin-off de Suits (2011), con base en Los Ángeles.Spin-off de Suits (2011), con base en Los Ángeles.Spin-off de Suits (2011), con base en Los Ángeles.
Explorar episodios
Reseñas destacadas
The Pilot has its ups and downs. It feels rushed more than anything else. There are good bits, interesting parts even, but they are short lived as everything seems to be moving so quick. Even the dialogue felt rushed at times, hard to keep track of, which makes even the great jokes ( and there are some in there ) hard to enjoy because of the pacing. It just feels like the story that took place in the pilot should have been spread out into about three episodes or so.
The plot is good, and the characters have lots of potential, but something just felt off for the entire duration of the first episode. While I absolutely do not want to compare this to the original series, and I would understand the creators wanting to try new things, I have to say that this just did not have the "Suits" vibe.
If the next few episodes slow things down a bit maybe we can get accustomed to the novel style of the series. I really have faith in Aaron Korsh and the cast and I believe Suits LA can achieve even greater heights than Suits.
Can't wait for the next episode.
The plot is good, and the characters have lots of potential, but something just felt off for the entire duration of the first episode. While I absolutely do not want to compare this to the original series, and I would understand the creators wanting to try new things, I have to say that this just did not have the "Suits" vibe.
If the next few episodes slow things down a bit maybe we can get accustomed to the novel style of the series. I really have faith in Aaron Korsh and the cast and I believe Suits LA can achieve even greater heights than Suits.
Can't wait for the next episode.
So they've opened a can of (very, very) beautiful women, gave the Green Arrow a lawyer degree and that Stuart character the most hideous beard in beard history but then forgot to write a descent storyline that would create the same kinda magic the original version of the show did? I'm not comparing it with Suits but if it carries the name at least it should remind to its big brother/sister... It also lacks chemistry between the characters...
And pls, Stuart, pls shave that ugly thing you call a beard off... or don't glue it back on the next shootingday... You look like Zack Morris from Saved by the Bell in a school play...
And pls, Stuart, pls shave that ugly thing you call a beard off... or don't glue it back on the next shootingday... You look like Zack Morris from Saved by the Bell in a school play...
Suits: LA had a rocky beginning, but by the time the final episode rolled around, it had started to show real promise-and left me genuinely wanting more. What began as a shaky spin-off slowly found its footing, revealing flashes of the sharp wit, character dynamics, and legal drama that made the original Suits such a hit. Unfortunately, it seems the show wasn't given enough room to grow, which is a shame considering how much potential it showed by the end.
One of the most noticeable issues with Suits: LA was its pacing in the early episodes. A significant amount of time was spent establishing backstories-sometimes at the expense of forward momentum. While understanding a character's motivations and past is important, the show leaned a little too heavily on exposition, bogging down the narrative and making it hard for viewers to fully connect with the present-day storylines. The main character's traumatic past, the firm's murky ethical history, and various unresolved issues were all introduced early on, but rather than being woven naturally into the plot, they were dumped in a way that felt more like catching up than storytelling.
That said, once the show started moving past the setup and into actual legal cases, it began to shine. The courtroom scenes became more engaging, the dialogue sharper, and the character interactions more authentic. There were clear attempts to recapture the clever banter and morally gray decisions that made Suits compelling, and at times, Suits: LA managed to hit those notes well. By the time the finale aired, the characters felt more grounded, and the storylines had more emotional weight and legal complexity.
Casting-wise, the show had potential. The lead brought a quieter intensity compared to Harvey Specter's bold charisma, which created a different but interesting tone. Supporting characters also began to come into their own, especially in the latter half of the season. You could sense the beginnings of strong chemistry between team members, and there were several subplot seeds that could have flourished if given more time.
The biggest disappointment isn't the show's rocky start-it's the decision to pull the plug just as things were improving. Canceling Suits: LA now feels premature. It's not uncommon for a spin-off series to take a few episodes-or even a full season-to hit its stride. Just look at how many shows go from mediocre beginnings to cult favorites once the writers find their rhythm and the actors settle into their roles. There's every reason to believe Suits: LA could have followed that same trajectory.
Rather than canceling the show outright, NBC (or whoever holds the rights) should strongly consider moving it to a streaming platform like Peacock. The original Suits saw a massive resurgence in popularity thanks to its availability on streaming, and Suits: LA could benefit from that same long-tail audience engagement. With the right marketing and a little patience, the show could build a loyal fan base. In fact, a slower-burn drama like this might thrive better in a binge-watch setting where viewers can stick with it long enough to see it improve.
In conclusion, while Suits: LA didn't come out of the gate with the same swagger as its predecessor, it was clearly evolving into something worthwhile. It deserved more time to develop, and it's frustrating to see that journey cut short just as it was getting interesting. Hopefully, this isn't the end for the Suits universe-because there's clearly more story to tell, and more viewers ready to watch it unfold.
One of the most noticeable issues with Suits: LA was its pacing in the early episodes. A significant amount of time was spent establishing backstories-sometimes at the expense of forward momentum. While understanding a character's motivations and past is important, the show leaned a little too heavily on exposition, bogging down the narrative and making it hard for viewers to fully connect with the present-day storylines. The main character's traumatic past, the firm's murky ethical history, and various unresolved issues were all introduced early on, but rather than being woven naturally into the plot, they were dumped in a way that felt more like catching up than storytelling.
That said, once the show started moving past the setup and into actual legal cases, it began to shine. The courtroom scenes became more engaging, the dialogue sharper, and the character interactions more authentic. There were clear attempts to recapture the clever banter and morally gray decisions that made Suits compelling, and at times, Suits: LA managed to hit those notes well. By the time the finale aired, the characters felt more grounded, and the storylines had more emotional weight and legal complexity.
Casting-wise, the show had potential. The lead brought a quieter intensity compared to Harvey Specter's bold charisma, which created a different but interesting tone. Supporting characters also began to come into their own, especially in the latter half of the season. You could sense the beginnings of strong chemistry between team members, and there were several subplot seeds that could have flourished if given more time.
The biggest disappointment isn't the show's rocky start-it's the decision to pull the plug just as things were improving. Canceling Suits: LA now feels premature. It's not uncommon for a spin-off series to take a few episodes-or even a full season-to hit its stride. Just look at how many shows go from mediocre beginnings to cult favorites once the writers find their rhythm and the actors settle into their roles. There's every reason to believe Suits: LA could have followed that same trajectory.
Rather than canceling the show outright, NBC (or whoever holds the rights) should strongly consider moving it to a streaming platform like Peacock. The original Suits saw a massive resurgence in popularity thanks to its availability on streaming, and Suits: LA could benefit from that same long-tail audience engagement. With the right marketing and a little patience, the show could build a loyal fan base. In fact, a slower-burn drama like this might thrive better in a binge-watch setting where viewers can stick with it long enough to see it improve.
In conclusion, while Suits: LA didn't come out of the gate with the same swagger as its predecessor, it was clearly evolving into something worthwhile. It deserved more time to develop, and it's frustrating to see that journey cut short just as it was getting interesting. Hopefully, this isn't the end for the Suits universe-because there's clearly more story to tell, and more viewers ready to watch it unfold.
The great thing about suits is right off the bat you get invested in these two men's lives. They let you in on a secret and we gotta keep it with them. The characters are built slowly and evenly throughout the show giving us their backstory through multiple episodes over the decade long run. We rooted for the characters from the word go. What about suits La is making me like the characters? Nothing. There is no banter, no fun, no quirky ness, no chemistry. Ted isn't as charismatic and there is no protege we care about. I dunno man it's a completely different show. It's a law show sure. But it's not SUITS. There is literally NOTHING in common between these two shows. If I was to was ncis and ncis la there are differences but the core is the same. FBI and fbi international, csi and csi Miami. The core is the same but not here. They just aren't the same. And you know what? Not loving it. I'll keep watching to give it a fair shot. But ya this is the worse spin off show I've watched. Couldn't they have at least picked one of the lawyers we already met? Scottie for example?
I am writing this review after viewing just the pilot - so it is early days! I felt it necessary to contribute for the sake of perspective as most of the early scribes are quite bizarre - representing love or hate and very little in between. The truth simply has to be somewhere in the middle! It's too early for me to give an IMDb score after just one episode but I suspect it will probably turn out to be around "6". Possibly I will go higher or lower as I see how things progress. Nonethess, I think it was a solid start and before the haters accuse me of working on the show - I don't. Heck, I don't even live in the USA (or Canada)! Why the haters seem to imagine the reboot would be a carbon copy of the original baffles me - why would it be? Conversely, how can it be such an injustice to the orginal when both series were created by the same guy? Doesn't make sense! I liked the original but thought it lost its way towards the end. I was less impressed with "Pearson" despite being a fan of Gina Torres. This latest incarnation, to me, has had a little more time and thought spent on it. The production and cinematography were top notch and Stephen Amell is a great actor and well chosen for the part he plays which is substantially different from his time as the "Green Arrow". A lot is packed into the pilot that offers potential. I shall certainly be investing some time in the series as it might just be another hit. For my part, I am glad it is not a Carbon Copy - that would have been incredibly tedious.
Renewed, Canceled, or Ending?
Renewed, Canceled, or Ending?
Check out our list of renewals and cancellations to see if your favorite show made the cut.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesGabriel Macht reprises his "Suits" role as Harvey Specter.
- ConexionesSpin-off from Suits: La clave del éxito (2011)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta