O Auto da Compadecida 2

The history is about people that live in a very dry region o Brazil. People suffer a lot because the lack of water, but they trust in a better time of abundace. The faith in Saint Mary make them stronger in the journey.

João Grilo is the main character, in some way a lier, but at the same time a believer. His friend, Chicó, is a very funny guy, coward and a poet. Together, they are stronger, friends forever. Grilo ressurected twice because his beliefe, but he never remembers of the other side. He received some chances to change, but he always easier ways to solve the problems. He is a natural politician, he could be a good leader of that suffering people.

Haters exist everywhere nowadays. Haters will hate this review only because I rated this movie an 8.

But it got my eyes in tears at some parts (like the first one). And that's what movies are for. To make you feel human.

Of course this movie would not be par with the first one. That's impossible, the first one was a masterpiece.

However, if you give a chance, and try not to compare both movies but just enjoy the verses, the acting, the wit of the characters, you will see that it is a good movie. It may even touch you.

I prefer to live in a world where I am able to watch and enjoy this sequel (even if it doesn't compare with the original), than living in a world with only the good memories of the original movie.

Look, the movie is great, it has some good comedy, it shows how the characters are doing in the future (maybe not exactly), but the thing is that the movie has the same plot as the first one, but the difference here is on the judgement part, because João Grillo is the only one being judged, and Jesus and the Devil were interpreted by the same actor "as the angel and demon of João Grilo", and the judgement didn't feel the same thing as the judgement of the first movie, like, they tried to make it way more serious than the first judgement (they can do something serious but i think the execution didn't work well) Conclusion, is a great and funny movie, but its the same formula of the first movie, otherwise, i would give it a 9/10, but its a 7/10 because its a funny, but weak writting.

The Dog's Will2 manages to capture the magic and charm of the original while bringing a refreshing quality necessary for renewal. The direction by Guel Arraes, a master at balancing humor and social critique, guides the plot with finesse, maintaining the irreverent and captivating tone that made the first film a success. Matheus Nachtergaele and Selton Mello return with the same impeccable chemistry, delivering new moments of genuine comedy and emotion.

The storyline is an intelligent mix of elements from northeastern Brazilian popular culture, with touches of the supernatural and reflections on life and death. The interactions between the main characters, João Grilo and Chicó, and figures like Holy Mary, reaffirm the importance of faith and goodness, while still keeping the sarcastic and questioning tone that Ariano Suassuna's work has always had.

The introduction of new characters and challenges involving the afterlife creates an engaging and unique narrative. At the same time, there is a tribute to our traditions, beliefs, and existential dilemmas, with memorable scenes that uniquely blend comedy and drama. The art direction and cinematography also stand out, reinforcing the atmosphere of the Brazilian backcountry with its vibrant colors and poetic simplicity.

The Dog's will 2 is a continuation that respects the original work while offering something new and relevant to today's audience. It is a cinematic experience that combines laughter, fear, reflection, and above all, hope.

A Dog's Will 2 is an utterly deplorable sequel that tarnishes the charm of the original Brazilian classic. The plot is a chaotic mess, cobbling together tired tropes and forced humor that lands with all the grace of a lead balloon. João Grilo and Chicó, once lovable rogues, are reduced to caricatures spouting cringe-inducing dialogue that feels like it was scraped from a rejected sitcom script. The direction is sloppy, with jarring cuts and a pacing that drags like a funeral procession, making the 90-minute runtime feel like an eternity. The cinematography is uninspired, and the soundtrack is a forgettable mishmash of generic tunes. Even the cultural wit that made the first film a gem is replaced by lazy stereotypes and cheap gags. It's a soulless cash grab that betrays its legacy-avoid this cinematic trainwreck at all costs.