PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
5,5/10
25 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Añade un argumento en tu idiomaThe friends facing disastrously funny situations together and having each other's backs through the trenches to make it out of a new mess this time.The friends facing disastrously funny situations together and having each other's backs through the trenches to make it out of a new mess this time.The friends facing disastrously funny situations together and having each other's backs through the trenches to make it out of a new mess this time.
- Premios
- 2 premios y 3 nominaciones en total
Richa Amberr
- Reporter
- (as Richa Ambar)
Resumen
Reviewers say 'Fukrey 3' garners mixed opinions, with many praising its humor, cast chemistry, and continuation of beloved antics. Fans appreciate the comedic timing and light-hearted nature. However, critics argue the film lacks a coherent plot, with absurd scenarios straining credibility. Complaints about the weak script and diminishing quality compared to earlier installments arise. Some viewers find the humor forced and the movie disappointing, suggesting the franchise should have ended earlier.
Reseñas destacadas
Utter garbage it is. Not anywhere close the first two parts. It's very disgusting at most part of movie as it's all around susu, potty, G dhona, toilet water and what not (Literally). This one has no story, and goes here and there haywire. Too loud in some parts.
F3 won't match the expectations you would have. There is no glamour the first two had. There are some extremely boring and stretched parts, which shouldn't be there. Don't know about the writers but doesn't seem to be one who wrote first parts. Actors did all they could but the storyline was bad.
Assumptions that people will laugh and enjoy at anything movie makers would throw is not correct.
Avoid it !
F3 won't match the expectations you would have. There is no glamour the first two had. There are some extremely boring and stretched parts, which shouldn't be there. Don't know about the writers but doesn't seem to be one who wrote first parts. Actors did all they could but the storyline was bad.
Assumptions that people will laugh and enjoy at anything movie makers would throw is not correct.
Avoid it !
Can't make you laugh. You wait till the end of movie and it doesn't come. Conclusion:
"Drenched in Regret" is a perfect example of how not to make a film. Its lackluster storyline, poor acting, and failed attempts at humor leave audiences feeling like they've been caught in a never-ending rainstorm of disappointment. Perhaps it's best to leave this movie shipwrecked and seek out something that won't make you regret spending your time and money on it.am left with no choice but to give it a dismal 1-star rating. The poor story, abysmal acting, and unfunny jokes all contribute to this sinking ship of a movie.
Pankaj tripathy was the only good thing about the movie. The jokes are poorly written and the script is weak which just seems pointless after a while. Its a sheer waste of time and the. Don't think imdb is reliable anymore, with such high ratings for such a film. It's a classic franchise killer. They should've stuck with the original writers from the first two parts which it seems they did not. Feels like I would need to rewatch the first two parts again now, just to protect the memory of the first two parts in my mind. Rest if you have a couple of hundred bucks, or more, to kill and want to increase your appreciation for the classic priyadarshan films, do go and watch it :)
The third installment of the successful comedy franchise Fukrey struggles to retain the charm of Fukrey (2013) and Fukrey Returns (2017) and hasn't been able to live up to the expectations. Mrighdeep Singh Lamba's direction was average and he was not able to deliver a compelling slapstick comedy this time due to its thin plot and mediocre writing.
The first half of the film starts off well and it has some entertaining moments that give several occasions of laughter. But the second half becomes a victim of lazy writing and it is comparatively less on humour & the witty one-liners rarely land. Then the story goes off-track and tries to showcase a serious issue of water supply in Delhi and also it has a disappointing climax too. After a point, the screenplay won't be able to hold viewers and humour also gets repetitive.
Varun Sharma in his tailor-made role as Choochaa and Pankaj Tripathi as Pandit ji delivers an entertaining performance. Both the actors keep the audience engaged with their impeccable comic timing. Pulkit Samrat and Manjot Singh were decent in their roles. Richa Chadha shines again as Bholi Punjaban and gave a good performance. All other supporting actors were just fine in their respective roles.
Direction 2.5/5 Acting 3/5 Dialogues 3/5 Story 2/5 Screenplay 2/5.
The first half of the film starts off well and it has some entertaining moments that give several occasions of laughter. But the second half becomes a victim of lazy writing and it is comparatively less on humour & the witty one-liners rarely land. Then the story goes off-track and tries to showcase a serious issue of water supply in Delhi and also it has a disappointing climax too. After a point, the screenplay won't be able to hold viewers and humour also gets repetitive.
Varun Sharma in his tailor-made role as Choochaa and Pankaj Tripathi as Pandit ji delivers an entertaining performance. Both the actors keep the audience engaged with their impeccable comic timing. Pulkit Samrat and Manjot Singh were decent in their roles. Richa Chadha shines again as Bholi Punjaban and gave a good performance. All other supporting actors were just fine in their respective roles.
Direction 2.5/5 Acting 3/5 Dialogues 3/5 Story 2/5 Screenplay 2/5.
Sameer lodaya
What a movie was fukrey 1 followed by the 2nd was also good but the third did not match the level of fukrey
The content has no play in this movie as we all know we doesn't have to apply our minds while watching fukrey..the first half was bearable and had the hope that 2nd will be more better but it was worst..the movie suddenly left the charm because of long and creepy scenes some content was really yuks I don't know how they got the idea to entertain people with human waste
Chocha was same as before and maintained his madness with Pulkit, the legend pankajji ,Richa and Manjot all played very similar characters like they played before
It is very difficult to make sequels of a hit movie as people expect a lot and so we can expect fukrey 4 comes back with a bang
Regrets for low ratings.
What a movie was fukrey 1 followed by the 2nd was also good but the third did not match the level of fukrey
The content has no play in this movie as we all know we doesn't have to apply our minds while watching fukrey..the first half was bearable and had the hope that 2nd will be more better but it was worst..the movie suddenly left the charm because of long and creepy scenes some content was really yuks I don't know how they got the idea to entertain people with human waste
Chocha was same as before and maintained his madness with Pulkit, the legend pankajji ,Richa and Manjot all played very similar characters like they played before
It is very difficult to make sequels of a hit movie as people expect a lot and so we can expect fukrey 4 comes back with a bang
Regrets for low ratings.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesRicha Chaddha's character Bholi Punjaban's name is revealed to be Phoolkumari Sehgal.
- Banda sonoraVe Fukrey
Shabbir Ahmed
Dev Negi, Romy & Asees Kaur
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Fukrey 3?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 50 INR (estimación)
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 583.921 US$
- Duración2 horas 27 minutos
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta