Valiente

Low budget movies can be fun with the right mind and idea.

Personally I disliked the movie because it was predictable and easy cash grab for veterans fans of military media. So much potential yet so little ambition. I do Not recommended. It is a sloppy "realistic" military movie.

For the writer and director; you can do better.

I loved Valiant One! The story was a great story about how U. S. Army Soldiers can make great heroes and family members. The story was also a great story about fight to save lives, communism is evil, be strong, be courageous, be competent, and embrace love. The action was very cool; I really liked how the gunfire came out of the muzzle of the gun looking like a big epic star, and sounded epic. I liked how the movie was very good and was only one hour and 26 minutes long; proving movies don't need to be long to be good. All the actors did great at their roles. Therefore, Valiant One is definitely one of my new favorite movies! Have a great day and goooo Valiant One!

It seems I liked this movie more than most. I guess it's because it entertained me. I totally agree that the movie was poorly shot and the scenes and logic were weak. It was overall slow, slower than it needed to be, but i get the feeling they were going for. The ending was just ridiculous to me, but I won't even get into it. Regardless, I did enjoy the concept and trying to put myself into that situation. I've really started enjoying war movies more than i ever have so that may play a role into why I feel the way I do about it. That being said, this isn't one I would go out and buy.

Watched at AMC on 2-5-2025.

Chase Stokes' performance in this film leaves much to be desired. Just absolutely awful on every level. In my opinion, he stands out as one of the least impressive actors in Hollywood. His makeup and lip gloss usage in this movie surpasses that of a Kardashian, which is puzzling and just unreal, especially for a role meant to portray a US soldier in North Korea. Frankly, it's hard to understand how he was chosen for such a part. His acting is overly dramatic and falls beneath even mediocre standards. Actors like him often seem more focused on their appearance on camera rather than the authenticity of the film or connecting with the audience. There were certainly other actors who could have done a much better job. It's perplexing and sad to see someone who's trying to present a "pretty boy" image in a military setting. Unfortunately, Chase Stokes contributes to the film's shortcomings and low rating. He may want to reconsider his acting career or return to drama roles, as this portrayal in this type of movie is not convincing at all. His acting is just awful. Not 130 you look like an actual military soldier again he was too focused on what the camera thought of him. It's sad to observe that Hollywood struggles to find a suitable soldier/candidate for a genuine military role, opting instead for an actor who lacks the maturity and skill needed for such a character. I can't say enough bad things about Chase Stokes other than he is one of the worst actors I have ever seen in a military movie. Maybe go back to being a mediocre little backstreet boy in a drama--This military movie stuff is definitely not for you.

Mediocre Movie which could've been better with better direction and story.

The Lead and other actors could've played a better role too.

These characters were not fit for combat, they couldn't aim, or the direction made it that easy to notice. Again, shouting repeatedly in army scenes/roles is common but when it is not well executed it looks worse.

The second half made no sense, not that the first half did.

I have seen only Lana Condor's work. I loved the way she did the previous roles, but after this I think she should stay away from such roles, she didn't try her best or the characters were that inexperienced I don't know. She just failed big time.