Un régimen autoritario está a punto de desmoronarse. Cuenta la historia de un año entre los muros de su palacio.Un régimen autoritario está a punto de desmoronarse. Cuenta la historia de un año entre los muros de su palacio.Un régimen autoritario está a punto de desmoronarse. Cuenta la historia de un año entre los muros de su palacio.
- Nominado para 1 premio Primetime Emmy
- 7 nominaciones en total
Explorar episodios
Reseñas destacadas
Ok, this is an odd one. And worthy of your attention. The premise seems imaginative but if you've an ear to world history and current events, the story is too plausible to be disregarded as fiction inspired by unrealistic fantasy. If you can't see the parallels to the insidious culture of indulging the sickest whims of our out-of-touch rulers, then this will probably be more irritating than relevant. Stop trying to compare it to anything else because you will mislead anyone curious about it. It's dark. Don't expect it to be humorous. Ironic, yes. Funny, no. The concept is relevant and the performances are fantastic. If you're looking for lighthearted entertainment, then this will probably not be for you. It requires a thoughtful, critical, and open mind to appreciate the satire. It's uncomfortable. It's disturbing in a very biting and calculated way to provoke thought. I like it.
I have to say I expected it to be way worse, and after watching 3 episodes I'm pleasantly surprised. Being from a post-communist country, I can definitely sense the satire and sarcasm of this show. They managed to portray the absurdity of dictatorships and its dictators pretty well. It reminds me of Lukashenko's Belarus or Ceausescu's Romania. I liked the subtle references to certain people and events. The "reunification" thing is basically what happened in Crimea, the Corporal practically became Elena's Rasputin for a while, and the whole "rural craze" was a spot on too, as such things really happened in my country during communism, not to mention faking some pseudo-historical theories of one's origin to boost their egos ("The Foundling"). I have to admit I am quite entertained, intrigued and want to watch more. Lastly, I will say that I'm not really surprised at the low rating, as there is many things about this show that your typical western audience simply wouldn't get.
By attempting to merge elements from "The Death of Stalin," "The Grand Budapest Hotel," and "Borat" into a single narrative, the show becomes a bewildering concoction rather than a cohesive piece. The 'satire' - if it can be called that - stumbles significantly, as it appears unanchored from any semblance of reality. Instead, it leans heavily on bizarrely synthesized stereotypes of Eastern Europe in the American imagination.
The characters are shallow caricatures, lacking depth and authenticity, which further distances the narrative from delivering any meaningful or resonant messages. The show oscillates between trying to be a biting political satire (of what, though?) and a slapstick comedy, never fully committing to either.
The production values and the performances by the cast are commendable for the most part, yet they are not nearly enough to salvage the show from its fundamental flaws.
The characters are shallow caricatures, lacking depth and authenticity, which further distances the narrative from delivering any meaningful or resonant messages. The show oscillates between trying to be a biting political satire (of what, though?) and a slapstick comedy, never fully committing to either.
The production values and the performances by the cast are commendable for the most part, yet they are not nearly enough to salvage the show from its fundamental flaws.
This was a series with so much potential. Funny, no - at least I never found anything to laugh at, but satire does not need to be side splittingly hilarious.
I would have loved to see more of Andrea Riseborough. I thought she was one of the more interesting parts of the series, but it was not to be. What happened to the child? Throughout the entire 6th episode Kate Winslett's character does not enquire about him once. Even for a megalomaniac that is quite something.
I seem to be one of the few that did not take to the "butcher". I found her fascination with him quite baffling.
I agree with those who think that Kate Winslett had too much screen time to the detriment of the other characters. Less is more. And this could have been so much more.
I would have loved to see more of Andrea Riseborough. I thought she was one of the more interesting parts of the series, but it was not to be. What happened to the child? Throughout the entire 6th episode Kate Winslett's character does not enquire about him once. Even for a megalomaniac that is quite something.
I seem to be one of the few that did not take to the "butcher". I found her fascination with him quite baffling.
I agree with those who think that Kate Winslett had too much screen time to the detriment of the other characters. Less is more. And this could have been so much more.
Several people have mentioned that the negative reviews are from people too dense or too uneducated to see this series as anything but brilliant. That's an uneducated take in itself. It is possible to both understand the satirical narrative of the series and its winking lambasting of geopolitics, political theatre, and the delicate dance of those who keep the powerful in power, and still find it unpalatable.
It's not a bad series; the acting and cast are fantastic, and there is an interesting story being told. But it's buried beneath so many layers of mismatched cinematic styles, jaunty musical score, and washed out color palettes that the effect was like a confusing mishmash of distinct film styles like Expressionism, Film Noir, and Postmodernism. Each of these styles are great on their own, and perhaps there is a new genre of television being formed in the making of The Regime. It's promising, it's bold, but was ultimately too distracting for me to get lost in the narrative.
It's not a bad series; the acting and cast are fantastic, and there is an interesting story being told. But it's buried beneath so many layers of mismatched cinematic styles, jaunty musical score, and washed out color palettes that the effect was like a confusing mishmash of distinct film styles like Expressionism, Film Noir, and Postmodernism. Each of these styles are great on their own, and perhaps there is a new genre of television being formed in the making of The Regime. It's promising, it's bold, but was ultimately too distracting for me to get lost in the narrative.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesKate Winslet said of the outrageously dark and twisted spoof "I had never read a script like it, I I had never come across the character quite like her. And I knew that as a role for me, I had never played anything like her before and I wanted to do comedy. I love the fact that, yes, it's about a dictator, but she's also a female dictator. It's not a male dictator. And I knew the nuances and the feminine fragility that I could explore behind that mask."
- ConexionesReferenced in 82nd Golden Globe Awards (2025)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How many seasons does The Regime have?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- The Regime
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresa productora
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta