Antes de volver a la Universidad, Frankie quiere pasar una última noche en su pueblo costero. Pero el hombre del saco local, Mr. Puch acecha en las sombras y quiere cazarles a todos.Antes de volver a la Universidad, Frankie quiere pasar una última noche en su pueblo costero. Pero el hombre del saco local, Mr. Puch acecha en las sombras y quiere cazarles a todos.Antes de volver a la Universidad, Frankie quiere pasar una última noche en su pueblo costero. Pero el hombre del saco local, Mr. Puch acecha en las sombras y quiere cazarles a todos.
Conor Charlton
- Local
- (voz)
Jon Holmes
- Local
- (voz)
Reseñas destacadas
If you can get past the atrocious script/dialogue and some wooden acting, you're still left with a film that isn't sure if it's a seaside-town drama or a horror film. The first 50 minutes is more of a seaside teen drama, not a horror.
It comes across like it was written by a 14-year-old for English homework, with an assumption that using a scattergun approach of throwing in out-of-place swearing, references to TikTok, Instagram, knife-possessing teens, wokeness, gentrication, hippie/hipsters, veganism, a male and female gay couple, and drug taking makes it relevant and cool.
Really it just makes it laughably forced and ridiculous, it's like they've gone down a checklist and thrown it all in for no reason.
Visually it's nicely shot but unfortunately that doesn't make up for the dull schizophrenic storyline, the hilarously bad dialogue and the ridiculousness of events and conversations that unfold.
Nobody seems to question why there's a guy walking around in a "scary" mask with a bloodied baseball bat, they're instead all super friendly with him and even recording him on their phones; at one point a girl watches her friend getting killed but instead of running away waits around to be next, another keeps shouting her boyfriend's name while trying to hide from the killer, to name just some of the eye-roll inducing script-writing.
There's a particularly comedic performance by two policeman, one of which doesn't seem to care that the girl has a massive bloody handprint on her hoodie, and his partner that after seeing him gets bludgeoned just gets back in his police car and drives the killer off in his passenger seat like nothing has happened.
The identity of the killer was obvious and the reason for all the killing was at least consistently stupid/ridiculous.
As a horror fan I'm adept at suspending my disbelief, but it's so ridiculous even that's not possible. Especially the hilariously stupid ending.
Give it a watch if you think I might be wrong, but don't be surprised if you come out of it wanting the 81 minutes of your life back.
It comes across like it was written by a 14-year-old for English homework, with an assumption that using a scattergun approach of throwing in out-of-place swearing, references to TikTok, Instagram, knife-possessing teens, wokeness, gentrication, hippie/hipsters, veganism, a male and female gay couple, and drug taking makes it relevant and cool.
Really it just makes it laughably forced and ridiculous, it's like they've gone down a checklist and thrown it all in for no reason.
Visually it's nicely shot but unfortunately that doesn't make up for the dull schizophrenic storyline, the hilarously bad dialogue and the ridiculousness of events and conversations that unfold.
Nobody seems to question why there's a guy walking around in a "scary" mask with a bloodied baseball bat, they're instead all super friendly with him and even recording him on their phones; at one point a girl watches her friend getting killed but instead of running away waits around to be next, another keeps shouting her boyfriend's name while trying to hide from the killer, to name just some of the eye-roll inducing script-writing.
There's a particularly comedic performance by two policeman, one of which doesn't seem to care that the girl has a massive bloody handprint on her hoodie, and his partner that after seeing him gets bludgeoned just gets back in his police car and drives the killer off in his passenger seat like nothing has happened.
The identity of the killer was obvious and the reason for all the killing was at least consistently stupid/ridiculous.
As a horror fan I'm adept at suspending my disbelief, but it's so ridiculous even that's not possible. Especially the hilariously stupid ending.
Give it a watch if you think I might be wrong, but don't be surprised if you come out of it wanting the 81 minutes of your life back.
Saw this today at the Bournemouth horror movie film festival "screams by the sea" Loved it. I wont spoil it other than to say it builds into a fantastic movie with some great twists along the way. I thought the cinematography was spot on, some great drone shot and performances by the actors. It showed a very bleak looking dying northern seaside town and the reality of living in a place like that. The killer was genuinely disturbing, my only negative, the way the audio was mixed (or maybe it was the speakers at the venue) you could only understand about 30% of what the protagonist was saying. Recommended.
The visuals in the movie are actually good, but the rest is so bad it doesn't matter by the end. Killer is hard to understand at times with the electro-voice box, characters don't react as they should to events in front of them, and the kills are all boring except for the one with the redhead on the dock. Ending was puzzling and an attempt at a twist I guess. The twist was it didn't make sense or work at all. End credits say 'Mr. Punch will be back' so the makers seemed pretty confident they made a franchise starter. Um, no. It's nice that the friends of the crew gave the movie 8s out of 10, but watch it and you'll want to have a little talk with them afterwards. In the end, I watched this on Tubi, so free streaming. I still want my money back.
I would rather be punched than have to sit through this again. The sound guy for this must have lied in his resume or maybe it was just something that went wrong. Whatever the cause the sound was muffled and it made it difficult for me to make out most of the dialogue. The location and the location shots were good. The lead actress seemed capable the actress that played the mother was chewing through the scenery ( a bit over the top ) . We have seen this story before and done better. If only the sound was better but it wasn't. Less than 90 minutes but felt like 2:30 . The one thing I liked was the ending . The ending was a nice twist but not enough to redeem the film.
Punch is a low budget British slasher horror set in a down-at-heal seaside town.
It's a nice try, but it wears its influences on its sleeve and suffers from an identity crisis as a result. Is this a social commentary on teenage life and subculture? Is this an 80s-style slasher flick with quips and gags and an amusing killer? Or is it a throwback to the more spiritual horror of the original Wicker Man?
The result is tonally incoherent; one minute deadly serious, the next seeking laughs. Characters act in odd ways with unclear motivations, designed to lead to a particularly obvious conclusion.
A main issue is the serious, family sub-plot that utilises suicide in an attempt to raise emotional stakes, but the jarring tonal shifts undermine this at every opportunity. But do we ever really care about Punch's victims? Not really. Attempting to crowbar in the morality rules of stalk-and-slash into a serious narrative just does not work.
The acting performances are fine for the most part, though the older cast often let the side down. And I'm not so sure the peculiarly British character of Punch will travel well; a horror involving a murderous morris dancer troupe, shin-kicking to the death, or cheese-rolling cult might be just as relatable.
Punch would have been a far better movie had it chosen a lane and then stuck to it.
It's a nice try, but it wears its influences on its sleeve and suffers from an identity crisis as a result. Is this a social commentary on teenage life and subculture? Is this an 80s-style slasher flick with quips and gags and an amusing killer? Or is it a throwback to the more spiritual horror of the original Wicker Man?
The result is tonally incoherent; one minute deadly serious, the next seeking laughs. Characters act in odd ways with unclear motivations, designed to lead to a particularly obvious conclusion.
A main issue is the serious, family sub-plot that utilises suicide in an attempt to raise emotional stakes, but the jarring tonal shifts undermine this at every opportunity. But do we ever really care about Punch's victims? Not really. Attempting to crowbar in the morality rules of stalk-and-slash into a serious narrative just does not work.
The acting performances are fine for the most part, though the older cast often let the side down. And I'm not so sure the peculiarly British character of Punch will travel well; a horror involving a murderous morris dancer troupe, shin-kicking to the death, or cheese-rolling cult might be just as relatable.
Punch would have been a far better movie had it chosen a lane and then stuck to it.
¿Sabías que...?
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Punch?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Панч
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Hastings, East Sussex, Reino Unido(Main Location)
- Empresa productora
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
- Duración1 hora 21 minutos
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta