Resurrected
- 2023
- 1h 37min
PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
5,3/10
1,8 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
En un futuro distópico, el Vaticano sabe cómo resucitar a las personas. Un sacerdote descubre una conspiración detrás de las resurrecciones y su posible relación con una serie de asesinatos.En un futuro distópico, el Vaticano sabe cómo resucitar a las personas. Un sacerdote descubre una conspiración detrás de las resurrecciones y su posible relación con una serie de asesinatos.En un futuro distópico, el Vaticano sabe cómo resucitar a las personas. Un sacerdote descubre una conspiración detrás de las resurrecciones y su posible relación con una serie de asesinatos.
Michael Villar
- Frank Collins
- (as Michael Javier Villar)
Maryna Bennett
- Rose Patterson
- (as a different name)
Ahmed Mawas
- Sayid Aboud
- (as Ahmed El-Mawas)
Carolyn Alise
- Anna
- (as Carolyn A'Lise)
Reseñas destacadas
I have mixed feelings about this movie. The story could have been something if it was more elaborated towards the end. Now you're left with unanswered questions, not really a positive thing to me. What I didn't like, and it's not the first time I've seen movies shot like that lately, is the whole filming of a computer, going from one social media platform to another, from one call to another, or some googling, and that for the entire movie. Let just keep it at it is boring and looks cheap. I know it's a low budget movie and to be honest it shows. Add to that that I had to watch a German version of this movie where they had all written words in German without subtitles and it got even more annoying. I have some German knowledge but to have to read and translate what is showing on the screen in a movie where 90% of the time it's just like looking at your computer screen, let just say it wasn't a pleasant way to relax and watch a movie. Please just stop filming movies like this, we already spent enough time on our computers, tablets, smartphones etc...
I really enjoyed this.
The whole film takes place in the digital sphere...from facetime calls, to webcam chats, and even the metaverse.
With the plot revolving around the Vatican discovering how to resurrect people.
Not clone them...but actually resurrect them...with their memories of dying intact.
Hence, we find ourselves following things from the perspective of the father of the first resurrectee.
A young child that was killed in a car crash, with his father at the helm.
The father survives the ordeal, but his son does not.
Leading the boy's mother to cut him off from contact with his son, after the Vatican steps in to resurrect the boy.
An act which makes them both celebrities, of sorts.
The father, as a newly ordained Catholic priest, who is tasked with counseling new resurrectees- so as to help them readjust to life back on Earth.
And the son, as the face (and spokesperson) of this new class of resurrectees.
However...things start to take a dark turn, when one of his parishioners kills a number of his co-workers in a workplace massacre.
One act, among a trend, that has been turning "One Lifers" against the "R. P.s", as mob mentality starts to set in, in wake of the killings.
Thus, the whole thing ends up being a reflection of the philosophical debate surrounding the potential threats that advancements in the world of AI might bring about.
Spun in with speculation that those murdered by the RPs, will, themselves, be resurrected...only to act in the same manner.
Therefore creating a cascade effect, akin to a zombie apocalypse.
Which makes the film a sort of combination between Caviar and Infinity Pool (to compare it to other recent horror films, from this year).
Or, at least, a middle ground, between the two.
Which is actually pretty clever, if you think about it.
Because this film is, interestingly, oriented around a similar- yet, opposite- philosophical conundrum, compared to the one we find in Brandon Cronenberg's Infinity Pool.
In that, like in Cronenberg's film, death becomes meaningless.
Only, here, we are presented with a situation where, if the death of another no longer has philosophical meaning, what stops those who have lived through such an ordeal, from acting out in a depraved manner, to put others through the same experience they have gone through.
So as to offer them perspective, on what it's like to be a resurrectee.
Which has the same effect as not having to answer for the capital crimes you've committed, like we see in Infinity Pool...only, in the opposite way.
The two actually quite compliment each other...as they form a sort of unity of opposites.
While, the whole thing spirals into a bizarre conspiracy, like we see in Caviar.
Albeit, one much more coherent than we see in that film.
Despite the fact that they share stylistic similarities.
In the end, considering what it is- in regards to it's plot structure, and general construction- it's impressively engaging.
Simple, yet effective.
Which goes to show just what you can do with a little imagination, some decent writing, and solid performances from the cast.
I admit, I found this to be quite a fresh and entertaining story.
Even though it's structure is rather simplistic.
So give it a shot.
Because it's definitely worth a watch.
5.5 out of 10.
The whole film takes place in the digital sphere...from facetime calls, to webcam chats, and even the metaverse.
With the plot revolving around the Vatican discovering how to resurrect people.
Not clone them...but actually resurrect them...with their memories of dying intact.
Hence, we find ourselves following things from the perspective of the father of the first resurrectee.
A young child that was killed in a car crash, with his father at the helm.
The father survives the ordeal, but his son does not.
Leading the boy's mother to cut him off from contact with his son, after the Vatican steps in to resurrect the boy.
An act which makes them both celebrities, of sorts.
The father, as a newly ordained Catholic priest, who is tasked with counseling new resurrectees- so as to help them readjust to life back on Earth.
And the son, as the face (and spokesperson) of this new class of resurrectees.
However...things start to take a dark turn, when one of his parishioners kills a number of his co-workers in a workplace massacre.
One act, among a trend, that has been turning "One Lifers" against the "R. P.s", as mob mentality starts to set in, in wake of the killings.
Thus, the whole thing ends up being a reflection of the philosophical debate surrounding the potential threats that advancements in the world of AI might bring about.
Spun in with speculation that those murdered by the RPs, will, themselves, be resurrected...only to act in the same manner.
Therefore creating a cascade effect, akin to a zombie apocalypse.
Which makes the film a sort of combination between Caviar and Infinity Pool (to compare it to other recent horror films, from this year).
Or, at least, a middle ground, between the two.
Which is actually pretty clever, if you think about it.
Because this film is, interestingly, oriented around a similar- yet, opposite- philosophical conundrum, compared to the one we find in Brandon Cronenberg's Infinity Pool.
In that, like in Cronenberg's film, death becomes meaningless.
Only, here, we are presented with a situation where, if the death of another no longer has philosophical meaning, what stops those who have lived through such an ordeal, from acting out in a depraved manner, to put others through the same experience they have gone through.
So as to offer them perspective, on what it's like to be a resurrectee.
Which has the same effect as not having to answer for the capital crimes you've committed, like we see in Infinity Pool...only, in the opposite way.
The two actually quite compliment each other...as they form a sort of unity of opposites.
While, the whole thing spirals into a bizarre conspiracy, like we see in Caviar.
Albeit, one much more coherent than we see in that film.
Despite the fact that they share stylistic similarities.
In the end, considering what it is- in regards to it's plot structure, and general construction- it's impressively engaging.
Simple, yet effective.
Which goes to show just what you can do with a little imagination, some decent writing, and solid performances from the cast.
I admit, I found this to be quite a fresh and entertaining story.
Even though it's structure is rather simplistic.
So give it a shot.
Because it's definitely worth a watch.
5.5 out of 10.
Yes, it is a webcam- and chat-based movie. Which makes me wonder how well packed it is with action, that keeps you edge-seated. One third of the time are action scenes, shot again on webcams of all kinds.
Poster on IMDB page contains the poorest possible screenshot from the movie, please just disregard it. You may have your answer why this exact 3D is so rubbish when you watch the movie.
Key strength is a script. It's hard not to give away any detail, let's say the story contains ethical questions around religion, conspiracy theory, and several solid twists. Couple of gory scenes. No horror at all to my personal standards. Performances are better than one would expect.
My only criticism would be around final scenes, when it all breaks loose.. those could have been more.. spectacular, but I believe this is owing to budget limitations only.
Btw, don't skip final titles, the story is continued there.
Poster on IMDB page contains the poorest possible screenshot from the movie, please just disregard it. You may have your answer why this exact 3D is so rubbish when you watch the movie.
Key strength is a script. It's hard not to give away any detail, let's say the story contains ethical questions around religion, conspiracy theory, and several solid twists. Couple of gory scenes. No horror at all to my personal standards. Performances are better than one would expect.
My only criticism would be around final scenes, when it all breaks loose.. those could have been more.. spectacular, but I believe this is owing to budget limitations only.
Btw, don't skip final titles, the story is continued there.
This film does nothing but set the stage for a good movie. Maybe they'll make a part 2 and explain any of this mess (doubtful, with the ratings of this movie). I've never walked out of a movie with more questions, and zero answers, than this. Here's a few:
>> Just from Father Flynn's call:
This call made the whole thing sound supernatural. But, the ending just seems to refer to a webpage on the dark web, meaning real people? (I won't add spoilers) So confusing!
RECOMMENDATION: Skip it! Unless you like watching movies that confuse you, only to leave you hanging with zero answers!
- What's the FBI's involvement? And/or local police?
- What does that have to do with the Vatican?
- How are they resurrecting people?
- What is the importance of Bishop Hill? He seems shady. Why is he hanging around the Martin family so much? No idea - no answers???
>> Just from Father Flynn's call:
- "Priest, are you one of them? Do you know WHAT THEY are planning?" (I still don't have an answer to 'what' and 'they' are referring to!)
- "The frequencies have mutated, don't you understand?" (NO, and it's never explained?)
- "The 'Hughanauts' (sp?) tried to warn us." (Never even mentioned again in the movie)
- "You can't stop the 'WARRIORS' you fool... ...they're multiplying, soon they'll be everywhere... ...they're coming for me ... too late, they're INSIDE me now." (Meaning = not a person in the house, but something INSIDE of him. What got into him?? I'll never know?)
This call made the whole thing sound supernatural. But, the ending just seems to refer to a webpage on the dark web, meaning real people? (I won't add spoilers) So confusing!
RECOMMENDATION: Skip it! Unless you like watching movies that confuse you, only to leave you hanging with zero answers!
Is the acting the greatest? No. What makes this movie interesting is the story, the idea itself. That kind of saves the whole movie. It is an interesting story: resurrection... What would happen to the world, if we really could resurrect people... This movie made me think about that. How would people react to it? How would the world look like? And like the movie itself discusses too: Who would be entitled to it? So yes, I do think the movie is worth a watch for the story. And this new concept of making movies with online cameras/Facetime only, I find interesting too. This type of content becomes more popular. Seen worse. The acting isn't the greatest, but overall worth a watch if you find the storyline itself intriguing then you won't be too bored.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesTodas las entradas contienen spoilers
- PifiasJust after Stan subdues Agent Ortiz by slashing her throat, he turns back to his computer and accidentally calls to Rat but says "Cat?"
- ConexionesReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 967: Here (2024)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Resurrected?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 191.359 US$
- Duración1 hora 37 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
What is the Canadian French language plot outline for Resurrected (2023)?
Responde