Roswell: Veredicto final

I find this quite entertaining, even if the logic is flawed.

AI is used to determine if a person is telling the truth: It's analyzing decade old video, and sometimes only audio. I doubt the accuracy is very high but even if it was, most of the interviews are accounts from friends and family who heard stories.

There are a few 1st hand accounts (video) from people like Jesse Marcel which are quite good.

Despite that, I do like listening to the stories of credible witnesses (military people). I find it more interesting than actual "video evidence" of lights in the sky, etc.

Some people treat the UFO mystery as a religion and take it all too seriously. But for me this is entertainment only and I enjoy it.

No spoilers - I really enjoyed each episode, even if the "AI" animation silliness superimposed over decades old film is the gimmick.

Two complaints- 1) STOP with the ridiculous and teeth grindingly annoying "teletype" sound at the open of EVERY new segment. JUST STOP.

2) Constant recap after recap and scene set-up after scene set-up. Merely wastes time and extends each episode, for what reason I can not guess.

So the use of AI to review decades old video...it's not a bad idea or theory. But most of the stories are from people who were told by someone else and I have always believed this is what most of the people involved were told. The best witness in my opinion is Major Marcell who states what he actually saw with his own eyes and I've never believed a intelligence officer would mistake a balloon with a saucer. The show isn't bad I'd say it's worth the watch..how ever since we are now using AI to determine truths...why don't we run the same software on the more recent accounts of encounters? And government officials? Let's see how that plays out....

As a great believer in ufo phenomena it really is a shame that the subject gets dealt with in this way. They could have spent just 5 minutes telling us what we already know and just ditch the stupid AI assessments. I mean, really, are we expected to believe a dumb computer could analyze the faces of some 30,40and 50 year old film with any amount of accuracy? A great film for the non believers arsenal. Very bad.

Lets suppose that I tell my daughter that once I saw a flock of flying pigs with my own eyes. Years later after my passing she recounts the day I told her my account of the flying pigs. The most advanced generalized intelligence ever made by man running on a pseudo-entangled quantum computer analyzes her telling of the story and determines that she is 100% truthful. The world can now be rest assured that flying pigs are real.

That sounds like an appeal to ignorance and several other human fallacies at work. It's dumb.

So, if you can dismiss the crackhead logic used in this show and watch it purely for entertainment then it's still dumb.

All that I can really say is that you better hope I'm not the one that the aliens ask for advice as to why they shouldn't nuke us from orbit.