Mickey participa en una expedición humana para colonizar el planeta helado Niflheim. Es un "prescindible", un empleado descartable. Cada vez que muere, sus recuerdos se implantan en un nuevo... Leer todoMickey participa en una expedición humana para colonizar el planeta helado Niflheim. Es un "prescindible", un empleado descartable. Cada vez que muere, sus recuerdos se implantan en un nuevo cuerpo y su misión se reanuda.Mickey participa en una expedición humana para colonizar el planeta helado Niflheim. Es un "prescindible", un empleado descartable. Cada vez que muere, sus recuerdos se implantan en un nuevo cuerpo y su misión se reanuda.
- Director/a
- Guionistas
- Estrellas
- Premios
- 2 premios y 13 nominaciones en total
- Director/a
- Guionistas
- Todo el reparto y equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Resumen
Reviewers say 'Mickey 17' delves into identity, colonialism, and corporate greed with satirical political commentary. Robert Pattinson's performance and dark humor receive praise, while pacing issues and underdeveloped characters draw criticism. Some find the film too lengthy and lacking thematic depth. Mixed opinions exist on political satire and villain portrayals. Despite these critiques, many find the film engaging and thought-provoking, appreciating its unique sci-fi and social commentary blend.
Reseñas destacadas
Mickey 17 is like strictly okayish and that's a huge disappointment given the expectations!
Bong joon-ho returning in director's chair after an Oscar, with Robert pattinson, a sci-fi genre and huge budget, it could have been so much better! But this is just okay.
Pattinson's acting is great, even the premise and structure were very juicy. But for some reason Bong joon-ho doesn't fully capitalise it. Atleast the crazy energy of Okja would have elevated the screenplay, but it was mostly bland and trying to be politically aware.
Especially with that trailer being so much fun, the bar was really high, but this doesn't even comes close.
Bong joon-ho returning in director's chair after an Oscar, with Robert pattinson, a sci-fi genre and huge budget, it could have been so much better! But this is just okay.
Pattinson's acting is great, even the premise and structure were very juicy. But for some reason Bong joon-ho doesn't fully capitalise it. Atleast the crazy energy of Okja would have elevated the screenplay, but it was mostly bland and trying to be politically aware.
Especially with that trailer being so much fun, the bar was really high, but this doesn't even comes close.
The trailer was incredibly promising, compelling all of us to watch the movie at least once. I was expecting a "Lost in Space"-type adventure, where Mickey repeatedly dies for a meaningful cause and comes back to life to fulfill his purpose. However, the story didn't quite take that route. For those who usually claims a plot to be very much predictable, this movie is not like those.
The first part of the film was quite good, filled with dark comedy. We witness Mickey's suffering, understand why he chose his job, and see how indifferent everyone is to his recurring deaths. This tone persists through about two-thirds of the movie.
The expedition leaders were the most disappointing characters. They should have been more responsible and sensible, but the story chose to depict them as foolish jesters. The ending and climax was not very satisfying and was quite unpredictable, with numerous plot points, such as communication with the planet's inhabitants, that felt chaotic.
As for the acting, Robert Pattinson delivered an excellent performance, showcasing distinct personality shifts between his versions of Mickey. The other actors also did a commendable job, but the story itself was the primary letdown.
Spoilers:
I am left with two major questions after watching the movie:
First - How did the leader of the planet's inhabitants know Mickey's name?
Second - How was Mickey confident that detonating himself wouldn't also destroy the other Mickey?
The first part of the film was quite good, filled with dark comedy. We witness Mickey's suffering, understand why he chose his job, and see how indifferent everyone is to his recurring deaths. This tone persists through about two-thirds of the movie.
The expedition leaders were the most disappointing characters. They should have been more responsible and sensible, but the story chose to depict them as foolish jesters. The ending and climax was not very satisfying and was quite unpredictable, with numerous plot points, such as communication with the planet's inhabitants, that felt chaotic.
As for the acting, Robert Pattinson delivered an excellent performance, showcasing distinct personality shifts between his versions of Mickey. The other actors also did a commendable job, but the story itself was the primary letdown.
Spoilers:
I am left with two major questions after watching the movie:
First - How did the leader of the planet's inhabitants know Mickey's name?
Second - How was Mickey confident that detonating himself wouldn't also destroy the other Mickey?
Mickey 17 is such a wasted opportunity and for me the first big disappointment of 2025. It's 140' of nothing! A movie that constantly talks but doesn't actually say anything of value. It just has all these big ideas that end up nowhere and at times its only saving grace is some moments of levity that are really funny.
It's a science fiction movie that never explores its themes. What does it say about cloning? About colonization? It touches these subjects, sure, but it's so shallow.
Robert Pattinson is fine but I think he's wasted in this. All the different versions of Mickey are also supposed to have different personalities but aside from 17 and 18 (as seen in the trailer) the previous 16 all act the same, even though the movie says that have different characteristics. But even that doesn't matter because we never get to see all the different Mickeys aside from a quick montage.
Also, let me say that the use of narration in this movie is egregious. It doesn't enhance the experience, it's just filler to cover the silence.
Finally, it's so boring! Boring visuals, boring sci-fi elements, boring creature designs, no unique aesthetic, no nothing.
It's a science fiction movie that never explores its themes. What does it say about cloning? About colonization? It touches these subjects, sure, but it's so shallow.
Robert Pattinson is fine but I think he's wasted in this. All the different versions of Mickey are also supposed to have different personalities but aside from 17 and 18 (as seen in the trailer) the previous 16 all act the same, even though the movie says that have different characteristics. But even that doesn't matter because we never get to see all the different Mickeys aside from a quick montage.
Also, let me say that the use of narration in this movie is egregious. It doesn't enhance the experience, it's just filler to cover the silence.
Finally, it's so boring! Boring visuals, boring sci-fi elements, boring creature designs, no unique aesthetic, no nothing.
Bong Jongho's next wide-screen project since his historic win at the Oscar's is rather a big let-down.
For such an intriguing premise, we should have been promised a story with colorful development and of gray morality, and yet were presented with such an obviously black-and-white good-triumphing-over-evil Hollywood movie.
The morality of science? The definition of one's self? The Ship of Theseus paradox? Like, such a wasted opportunity to explore the multitude of questions. I guess it's my fault to expect too much.
Robert Pattinson and Toni Collette are amazing, though. Brilliant camera work and visual effects.
For such an intriguing premise, we should have been promised a story with colorful development and of gray morality, and yet were presented with such an obviously black-and-white good-triumphing-over-evil Hollywood movie.
The morality of science? The definition of one's self? The Ship of Theseus paradox? Like, such a wasted opportunity to explore the multitude of questions. I guess it's my fault to expect too much.
Robert Pattinson and Toni Collette are amazing, though. Brilliant camera work and visual effects.
For being a sci-fi flick it does ok. It doesn't introduce anything groundbreaking but it is something different. Does it hold up to other sci-fi films? I'd say no, but if you're looking for an average film to burn 2 hours with this does the job.
I will say that considering who it was written and directed by, there was a much higher expectation. After watching a film like Parasite, which was very well done, this was rather tame. I think part of it is the narration and the other part was the writing. Acting wise I think everyone did a fine job, there were themes that were put out there that didn't quite hit or didn't really matter as the story unfolds, and while I could sympathize with the characters and the situations, the actions and consequences of them didn't carry much weight.
This didn't seem to be set up for a sequel and probably for the best, but I'd be curious to see if a part 2 would have more to offer. Overall I gave it a 6 and likely wont see it again.
I will say that considering who it was written and directed by, there was a much higher expectation. After watching a film like Parasite, which was very well done, this was rather tame. I think part of it is the narration and the other part was the writing. Acting wise I think everyone did a fine job, there were themes that were put out there that didn't quite hit or didn't really matter as the story unfolds, and while I could sympathize with the characters and the situations, the actions and consequences of them didn't carry much weight.
This didn't seem to be set up for a sequel and probably for the best, but I'd be curious to see if a part 2 would have more to offer. Overall I gave it a 6 and likely wont see it again.
New and Upcoming Book-to-Screen Adaptations
New and Upcoming Book-to-Screen Adaptations
From literary classics to graphic novels and more, see what books have recently made, or will be making the leap to the big (and small) screen in 2025 and beyond.
Banda sonora
Obtén una vista previa de la banda sonora aquí y continúa escuchándola en Amazon Music.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThe planet is called Niflheim. In Norse mythology, this is a realm in a permanent state of Winter, the afterlife for those who do not die a heroic death.
- PifiasThe red MR2 from his memories has only 2 front seats, so he couldn't have chosen to ride in the front as opposed to the back.
- Citas
Mickey Barnes: Our entire life is a punishment.
- Créditos adicionalesThe title doesn't appear until around the 33-minute mark.
- ConexionesFeatured in WatchMojo: Must Watch: Best of March 2025 (2025)
- Banda sonoraTerra Lontana
Written and Performed by Nino Rota
Courtesy of CAM
Under license from Universal Music Operations Ltd
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Mickey 17?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Mikki 17
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 118.000.000 US$ (estimación)
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 46.047.147 US$
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- 19.002.852 US$
- 9 mar 2025
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 133.347.147 US$
- Duración
- 2h 17min(137 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta






