The Tiger King and I

Yet another nauseatingly selfindulgent journalist trying to be funny - just ending up being really annoying. Not EVERY question need to have a lame punchline. The timing is awful, and the atmosphere is deeply akward. Basically, the host talks to himself: "Hey, listen, I'm funny. Hey, listen, I'm funny again". Some of the guests try to be serious - but i all drowns in "funny funny funny". Must be avoided. Stick to the seven original parts

All the questions were one sided and subjective. Like asking an animal enthusiast who would they trust more- a tiger or Joe Exotic. They then answer "a tiger" and host proceeds to nod with understanding. This is such stupid journalism. Nothing new here. Wast of time, don't watch.

Trashy and fast produced add on to ride on the hype that has nothing to do with the high produciton value and subtile nuances of the original show. This is worse than an average Skype interview on Youtube. And this says a lot. Just a quick cash grab that wastes everyones time watching it. Avoid it like the.. you know...

Disgusting Self boosting from Joel's behalf. Shamefull

I could not last 3 minutes listening to the self centered host. I thought it would be some interesting look into the after affects from legal remedies after the shows appearance, but instead I got to listen to this smock bragging of how famous the Tiger King have become.

1 of 10 tomatoes. Just ruined 3 minutes I rather be scratching my balls.