Documental que dibuja un futuro optimista según la humanidad adopta nuevas tecnologías e innovaciones y se replantea cómo gestiona el agua.Documental que dibuja un futuro optimista según la humanidad adopta nuevas tecnologías e innovaciones y se replantea cómo gestiona el agua.Documental que dibuja un futuro optimista según la humanidad adopta nuevas tecnologías e innovaciones y se replantea cómo gestiona el agua.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Premios
- 1 premio en total
Reseñas destacadas
This film tells us about inovative ways of conserving water, conjuring water where there is none and dealing with it once it becames waste.
I recently watched this documentary with my family and kids over the weekend. I was eager to see what Matt Damon had to say about water!! All of my family enjoyed the film and learned something new including my 8 and 9 year old kids who have just informed me they would like to work in water!
The solutions presented were the right mix of science and story and the film really broke down some of the challenges in the water industry.
I hope there will be a Brave Blue part 2 or a series where they will go more into detail about each of the different areas within this complex industry.
(Beth's story was without doubt my favourite!)
The solutions presented were the right mix of science and story and the film really broke down some of the challenges in the water industry.
I hope there will be a Brave Blue part 2 or a series where they will go more into detail about each of the different areas within this complex industry.
(Beth's story was without doubt my favourite!)
Full of vaporware tech.
It was painful to watch.
So many contradictions between chapters.
The odd chapters was interesting just to see existing industrial complex but mostly awful.
And the narrative was just silly.
How is this 7+ stars.
I am a chemist, engineer, and water resource scientist. While I'm always happy to see a documentary raise awareness of water availability/quality issues, this documentary has a number of issues of its own.
First of all, the so-called 'solutions' being offered by its sprawling list of do-gooder celebrities are not innovative, novel, or sustainable. They're well-proven technologies putting temporary band-aids on deep sociopolitical problems for the sake of making their celebrity sponsors feel good.
Second, the film has a number of corporate sponsors. As a result, it failed to touch on some very real issues with the way we currently treat water. For example, Reverse Osmosis is disgustingly inefficient. It wastes about half the water it treats. It also absolute munches through power, and the waste stream from RO is a concentrated pollutant being shot back into the environment. But Suez, one of the sponsors, is a major player in RO and membrane desalination. So that got glossed over.
Third, it perpetuates the myth of a straight-up bogus technology. Humidity-condensers are not viable products. They've been debunked over and over and over again. The thermodynamics of converting whatever small amount of moisture is in the air to drinking water are enormous. And other than that lone instance of local innovation, the rest of the documentary reeks of western-savior complex.
This documentary is mental candy. Replaces real nutrition, and is bad for your teeth (from all the clenching).
First of all, the so-called 'solutions' being offered by its sprawling list of do-gooder celebrities are not innovative, novel, or sustainable. They're well-proven technologies putting temporary band-aids on deep sociopolitical problems for the sake of making their celebrity sponsors feel good.
Second, the film has a number of corporate sponsors. As a result, it failed to touch on some very real issues with the way we currently treat water. For example, Reverse Osmosis is disgustingly inefficient. It wastes about half the water it treats. It also absolute munches through power, and the waste stream from RO is a concentrated pollutant being shot back into the environment. But Suez, one of the sponsors, is a major player in RO and membrane desalination. So that got glossed over.
Third, it perpetuates the myth of a straight-up bogus technology. Humidity-condensers are not viable products. They've been debunked over and over and over again. The thermodynamics of converting whatever small amount of moisture is in the air to drinking water are enormous. And other than that lone instance of local innovation, the rest of the documentary reeks of western-savior complex.
This documentary is mental candy. Replaces real nutrition, and is bad for your teeth (from all the clenching).
Bias, unsupported with facts, eco-fanatics opinions...and opposition opinions not permitted. The involvement of these high profile celebrities is suspect, too. They've invested in these schemes, so from a perspective, it's an infomercial for their personal wealth.
There's *an identical* "documentary", "A Thirsty World" (2012), that gives the same message. Here we are, eight years after that one, and not one prediction has come to fruition. Actually, some have proven to be the exact opposite of the doom and gloom forecast.
Some nice scenery, if you have a large screen, but otherwise, you can watch with no volume
There's *an identical* "documentary", "A Thirsty World" (2012), that gives the same message. Here we are, eight years after that one, and not one prediction has come to fruition. Actually, some have proven to be the exact opposite of the doom and gloom forecast.
Some nice scenery, if you have a large screen, but otherwise, you can watch with no volume
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 750.000 US$ (estimación)
- Duración50 minutos
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was Brave Blue World (2019) officially released in Canada in English?
Responde