[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario de lanzamientosLas 250 mejores películasPelículas más popularesExplorar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y ticketsNoticias sobre películasNoticias destacadas sobre películas de la India
    Qué hay en la TV y en streamingLas 250 mejores seriesProgramas de televisión más popularesExplorar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    ¿Qué verÚltimos tráileresOriginales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthPremios STARmeterCentral de premiosCentral de festivalesTodos los eventos
    Personas nacidas hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias de famosos
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de seguimiento
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar la aplicación
  • Reparto y equipo
  • Reseñas de usuarios
  • Curiosidades
  • Preguntas frecuentes
IMDbPro

Pesadilla en Elm Street. El origen

Título original: A Nightmare on Elm Street
  • 2010
  • 16
  • 1h 35min
PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
5,2/10
112 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
POPULARIDAD
3567
1091
Jackie Earle Haley in Pesadilla en Elm Street. El origen (2010)
The spectre of a disfigured man haunts the children of the parents who murdered him, stalking and killing them in their dreams.
Reproducir trailer1:57
18 vídeos
99+ imágenes
Serial KillerSlasher HorrorSupernatural HorrorTeen DramaTeen HorrorCrimeDramaHorrorMystery

El espectro de un violador de niños fallecido acecha a los hijos de los padres que lo asesinaron, acosándolos y matándolos en sus sueños.El espectro de un violador de niños fallecido acecha a los hijos de los padres que lo asesinaron, acosándolos y matándolos en sus sueños.El espectro de un violador de niños fallecido acecha a los hijos de los padres que lo asesinaron, acosándolos y matándolos en sus sueños.

  • Dirección
    • Samuel Bayer
  • Guión
    • Wesley Strick
    • Eric Heisserer
    • Wes Craven
  • Reparto principal
    • Jackie Earle Haley
    • Rooney Mara
    • Kyle Gallner
  • Ver la información de la producción en IMDbPro
  • PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
    5,2/10
    112 mil
    TU PUNTUACIÓN
    POPULARIDAD
    3567
    1091
    • Dirección
      • Samuel Bayer
    • Guión
      • Wesley Strick
      • Eric Heisserer
      • Wes Craven
    • Reparto principal
      • Jackie Earle Haley
      • Rooney Mara
      • Kyle Gallner
    • 876Reseñas de usuarios
    • 197Reseñas de críticos
    • 35Metapuntuación
  • Ver la información de la producción en IMDbPro
    • Premios
      • 2 premios y 11 nominaciones en total

    Vídeos18

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 1:57
    Official Trailer
    A Nightmare on Elm Street -- Trailer #3
    Trailer 2:04
    A Nightmare on Elm Street -- Trailer #3
    A Nightmare on Elm Street -- Trailer #3
    Trailer 2:04
    A Nightmare on Elm Street -- Trailer #3
    A Nightmare on Elm Street: Trailer #2
    Trailer 2:33
    A Nightmare on Elm Street: Trailer #2
    A Nightmare on Elm Street: Trailer #1
    Trailer 2:07
    A Nightmare on Elm Street: Trailer #1
    A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)
    Clip 1:09
    A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)
    A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)
    Clip 1:07
    A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)

    Imágenes365

    Ver cartel
    Ver cartel
    Ver cartel
    Ver cartel
    + 361
    Ver cartel

    Reparto principal56

    Editar
    Jackie Earle Haley
    Jackie Earle Haley
    • Freddy Krueger
    Rooney Mara
    Rooney Mara
    • Nancy Holbrook
    Kyle Gallner
    Kyle Gallner
    • Quentin Smith
    Katie Cassidy
    Katie Cassidy
    • Kris Fowles
    Thomas Dekker
    Thomas Dekker
    • Jesse Braun
    Kellan Lutz
    Kellan Lutz
    • Dean Russell
    Clancy Brown
    Clancy Brown
    • Alan Smith
    Connie Britton
    Connie Britton
    • Dr. Gwen Holbrook
    Lia D. Mortensen
    • Nora Fowles
    • (as Lia Mortensen)
    Julianna Damm
    • Little Kris
    Christian Stolte
    Christian Stolte
    • Jesse's Father
    Katie Schooping Knight
    • Creepy Girl #1
    Hailey Schooping Knight
    • Creepy Girl #2
    Leah Uteg
    Leah Uteg
    • Creepy Girl #3
    Don Robert Cass
    • History Teacher
    Kurt Naebig
    Kurt Naebig
    • Dean's Father
    Kyra Krumins
    Kyra Krumins
    • Little Nancy
    Brayden Coyer
    • Little Jesse
    • Dirección
      • Samuel Bayer
    • Guión
      • Wesley Strick
      • Eric Heisserer
      • Wes Craven
    • Todo el reparto y equipo
    • Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro

    Reseñas de usuarios876

    5,2111.9K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Reseñas destacadas

    2Rick_Gershman

    Incredibly disappointing, a slap in the face to true horror fans

    Picture the 1984 horror classic A Nightmare on Elm Street. Now picture that film if it was produced by bombastic Michael Bay, director of Pearl Harbor and the Transformers films. Now picture all of the worst possible outcomes of that marriage.

    You don't have to. You could just plunk down your hard-earned cash – better yet, don't – for this lame remake.

    Not that I can stop you from seeing it. No number of bad reviews (and this will be just one of many) would have kept me away. Curiosity alone demanded I see the new Elm Street, so when a critic buddy asked if I'd like to tag along to a screening, I did.

    I mean, it couldn't be awful, right? It's a darker take on a character that had fallen into parody. Its screenplay was co-written by Wesley Strick, who has worked with Martin Scorsese (1991's Cape Fear). And supernatural killer Freddy Krueger is played by Jackie Earle Haley, an Oscar-nominated actor who was so creepy as Rorschach in Watchmen. How bad could it be?

    Really bad, it turns out. Astonishingly, amazingly, how-could-you- possibly-screw-this-up-any-worse bad.

    Samuel Bayer, a longtime music video director making his feature-film debut, accomplished his stated goal of draining away all the cheeky fun of the Freddy films. Unfortunately, he also drained away all the scares. What's left is a dreary, poorly-lit slog with uninteresting characters, wooden acting and a complete lack of tension, suspense or energy.

    We could spend all day talking about the problems, but two big ones sink this new Nightmare all on their own.

    The first is the new Freddy – he's not scary at all. (Robert Englund's original Freddy at least was creepy for a couple of films before falling into camp.) Haley's tiny frame makes Freddy look puny and his voice sounds like an even-more-ridiculous take on the raspy Christian Bale "Batman" voice.

    Haley's not helped by the terrible new Freddy makeup, which presumably is supposed to look like a more "realistic" burn victim, but it robs him of any expression. Freddy's not scary; worse, he's not even interesting.

    You'd expect the new Nightmare to provide some creative new "kills," but that's the second huge problem. There are only a handful of kills throughout, and the better ones are taken directly from the 1984 original. In fact, fans of the original will note several virtually- identical scenes, all of them done on a higher budget but without a whit of artistry.

    Special note has to be made of the acting, which (with a couple of exceptions) is dreadful. I'll blame Bayer, because a few of these folks have been decent in other things, but they're laughable here. (I'm pretty sure Thomas Dekker was attempting to portray Casey Affleck if Casey Affleck had suddenly completely forgotten how to act. And he's one of the better ones.)

    Of all the leads, only Kyle Gallner manages to bring some desperately- needed personality and humor to the proceedings. Gallner single-handedly makes the final act interesting, since you'll have wanted every other character dead from the opening minutes.

    But he can't overcome Bayer's clueless direction, which telegraphs every shock and dream sequence from a mile away. One of the most effective elements of an Elm Street film is the subtle slide back and forth from the real world to the dream world. Bayer doesn't get this at all. Every dream sequence is clearly defined, completely destroying any suspense.

    The film spends two-thirds of its running time having its leads uncover Freddy's "story," which is ridiculous because it's a story everyone already knows. It momentarily plays with a slight twist on the original plot – a second of creativity, emerging like a flower through a crack in the sidewalk – then immediately chucks it.

    Don't get me wrong: I love horror films. I don't even ask too much of them. I only ask that they be either A) scary or B) fun. If they can be both, that's awesome.

    But with none of A and far too little of B, the new Elm Street barely rises above an F.
    3marijumanji

    Nothing 'New' about this Nightmare

    When it was announced that Jackie Earle Haley would be taking on the role of Freddy in the new Elm Street franchise reboot, a collective sigh of relief went up from the fans of the originals. Haley's Rorshach was one of the few redeeming qualities in the abysmal "Watchmen" movie. When pictures of Freddy's new face were leaked, the excitement grew. This Freddy promised to drop the silly one liners and be a return to the frightening, sadistic killer from the first film.

    Haley does what he can with what he's given, but even a game performance from him and Rooney Mara(Nancy) can't save this film from mediocrity. The male lead is played by Kyle Gallner. He could generously be called a poor man's Robert Pattinson. He does a serviceable job here but the weak writing and directing don't do him any favours.

    Fans of the original will be disappointed by the brief treatment of Freddy's origins, and it's unlikely new viewers will understand what is going on or even care for that matter. My hopes of a scarier Freddy were dashed within the first few minutes. The film doesn't even try to build an atmosphere and Haley spouts the same tired one liners that the later films leaned on so heavily.

    Even as the original series aged, one could always rely on the excellent special effects and make-up work to carry the films. The highlight of each film was the creativity of the different "Dream Worlds" that Freddy would take his victims to. Each dream world was unique because it reflected the thoughts of the character Freddy was trying to kill. This new iteration strips away any of that creativity and takes place almost entirely in one location (I'll avoid spoilers, but if you've seen any other film in the series you can easily guess where). The makeup work that looked promising in production stills doesn't hold up well on screen, failing to be as frightening or iconic as the original. The effects aren't great, it would be easy to beat the dead horse of 'computer graphics' being inferior but I think the real problem here is directorial. Samuel Bayer simply can't hold a candle to Wes Craven.

    If you want to disregard my comparisons to the original films and simply take this one for what it is, a brainless slasher flick, it still fails. None of the 'kills' show any creativity at all and audiences already fed on a steady diet of graphic violence won't find anything all that shocking or disturbing here. It's just boring.

    Adding to that is an over reliance on cheap scares. This film is this the cinematic equivalent of someone shouting "boo!" in your face every ten minutes. This technique becomes annoying almost instantly and becomes increasingly more annoying because it is used in every single scene. It's like the director realized he didn't know how to direct a scary movie and instead of quitting and finding a new job, he decided to edit in sudden loud noises and hope no one would notice.

    By the end the audience I saw it with could hardly hold back their titters of laughter and I don't mean that in a good way. This is one franchise that had some potential for rebirth, but I will be amazed if this one makes it to part 2.
    3jeffrey-mayhue

    Where was the whimsical world of nightmares?

    The first scene was my favorite part. Through the remainder of the movie Freddy's voice became more of an annoyance and distraction than a cause for fear (very similar to Christian Bale's Batman). I entered the movie expecting to get whisked away to the wonderful dream-world of Freddy Krueger but was instead pulled into a high school slasher film promoting a typical killer with a grudge and thirst for blood. The fact the victim was trapped inside a dream battling with Freddy wasn't quite enough to satisfy the sense of a nightmarish killer's dream world. The movie lacked the demented mental toyings a character like Freddy should possess (e.g. Pennywise). At the premier, the entire theater let out a "Boo" at the end of the movie. I recommend watching the original Freddy movies instead.
    5joanneburton-66331

    Lands Squarely In The Middle

    We all need to learn that nothing is truly sacred in Hollywood, so we might as well just embrace these remakes and hope that, every now and then, one of them will turn out ok and be able to hold itself up to the original on its own terms. A Nightmare on Elm Street comes incredibly close to standing out from the original film, but for every leap forward, it takes a few steps backwards until it's straddling the line between the two and not really committing fully to anything original.

    The story is, more or less, the same with a group of teenagers experiencing horrific nightmares involving a burnt man with a glove of knives who is slicing and dicing them. In both films, it's revealed that this man was someone their parents murdered in a fit of vigilante justice after he'd been let free for molesting their children. The new film adds a twist questioning if Freddy was actually guilty or innocent.

    The new Nightmare has a much bigger budget than the original film, so it's odd that the effects work isn't nearly as impressive as the original film. A bit of Freddy's makeup seems computer generated and a few of the other effects resemble a cheap 90's video game. The cast is fairly strong with Katie Cassidy, Kyle Gallner, and Thomas Dekker standing out as three of the terrified teens. Rooney Mara is the weak link among the them as Nancy. She's made the choice to play the character as moody and depressive, which makes her hard to root for and dull to watch.

    As Freddy, Jackie Earle Haley can only do so much to step out from the shadow of Robert Englund, but he does a good job and brings a different, more pervy energy to the character which adds a little threat that his silly makeup job keeps threatening to take away.
    5octagon88

    We all knew it was never going to beat the classic, but we were all expecting a good movie!

    Let me start off by saying i thought this movie was decent. But I expected a lot more.

    We all know the story of Freddy Krueger. How he got burnt etc. In this one it's the same, but it's the change of Freddy's character that really lost my interest. Jackie Earle Haley is about as best as you can get at playing Freddy Krueger. No one will ever beat Robert Englund. He's just Freddy Krueger! I don't really need to explain the plot, you all know the plot, BUT, let me explain the changes. In the old Nightmare On Elm Street, Freddy Krueger would always mess with people before he killed them. In this one he just kills them and doesn't mess around. Nothing humorous to say, nothing, just kills them. In the original he was a psychopathic killer who hurts children. In this one he's just a pedophile. Loves to screw all the women and girls. To me, that put me off. All this put me off. So Freddy's character changed a lot, but did it work? Not for me. Didn't work for me.

    All the acting was decent and there's some gory scenes, all in all, not the remake I was expecting and had hoped for. Everything about it is decent, but nothing great. 5/10

    Más del estilo

    Pesadilla en Elm Street 3: Los guerreros del sueño
    6,7
    Pesadilla en Elm Street 3: Los guerreros del sueño
    La nueva pesadilla de Wes Craven
    6,4
    La nueva pesadilla de Wes Craven
    Pesadilla en Elm Street 2: La venganza de Freddy
    5,5
    Pesadilla en Elm Street 2: La venganza de Freddy
    Pesadilla en Elm Street
    7,4
    Pesadilla en Elm Street
    Pesadilla en Elm Street 4
    5,6
    Pesadilla en Elm Street 4
    Viernes 13
    5,5
    Viernes 13
    Pesadilla en Elm Street 5: El niño de los sueños
    5,0
    Pesadilla en Elm Street 5: El niño de los sueños
    Freddy contra Jason
    5,7
    Freddy contra Jason
    Pesadilla final: La muerte de Freddy
    4,7
    Pesadilla final: La muerte de Freddy
    La matanza de Texas
    6,2
    La matanza de Texas
    Halloween: El origen
    6,0
    Halloween: El origen
    Viernes 13 (2.ª parte)
    6,1
    Viernes 13 (2.ª parte)

    Argumento

    Editar

    ¿Sabías que...?

    Editar
    • Curiosidades
      Freddy's sweater was knitted by Judy Graham, the same woman who knitted Freddy's sweater in the original Pesadilla en Elm Street (1984).
    • Pifias
      (at around 18 mins) When Nancy and Quentin are talking in the school, between shots Quentin's jumper moves so that 'Joy Division' is fully visible on his T-shirt, however when the camera moves back to the position it was before, the jumper has moved back, so that you can only see 'Y Divis'.
    • Citas

      Freddy Krueger: Why are you screaming? I haven't even cut you yet.

      [laughs evilly]

    • Créditos adicionales
      The movie's title doesn't appear on screen until nearly 10 minutes into the movie.
    • Conexiones
      Featured in The Rotten Tomatoes Show: Surrogates/Pandorum/Fame (2009)
    • Banda sonora
      A Nightmare on Elm Street
      Written by Charles Bernstein

    Selecciones populares

    Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
    Iniciar sesión

    Preguntas frecuentes27

    • How long is A Nightmare on Elm Street?Con tecnología de Alexa
    • Is there going to be a sequel, if not a reboot?
    • Is this film a remake, re-imagining, sequel, or prequel to the original film?
    • Is this film connected to the "Friday the 13th" re-imagining?

    Detalles

    Editar
    • Fecha de lanzamiento
      • 23 de julio de 2010 (España)
    • País de origen
      • Estados Unidos
    • Sitios oficiales
      • Warner Bros. (France)
      • Warner Bros. (Japan)
    • Idioma
      • Inglés
    • Títulos en diferentes países
      • Malson a Elm Street: L'origen
    • Localizaciones del rodaje
      • John Hersey High School, Arlington Heights, Illinois, Estados Unidos(high school scenes)
    • Empresas productoras
      • New Line Cinema
      • Platinum Dunes
    • Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro

    Taquilla

    Editar
    • Presupuesto
      • 35.000.000 US$ (estimación)
    • Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
      • 63.075.011 US$
    • Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
      • 32.902.299 US$
      • 2 may 2010
    • Recaudación en todo el mundo
      • 115.695.418 US$
    Ver información detallada de taquilla en IMDbPro

    Especificaciones técnicas

    Editar
    • Duración
      1 hora 35 minutos
    • Color
      • Color
    • Mezcla de sonido
      • Dolby Digital
      • DTS
      • SDDS
    • Relación de aspecto
      • 2.39 : 1

    Contribuir a esta página

    Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
    • IMDb Answers: ayúdanos a completar nuestras lagunas de datos
    • Más información acerca de cómo contribuir
    Editar página

    Más por descubrir

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación IMDb
    Inicia sesión para tener más accesoInicia sesión para tener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Anuncios
    • Empleos
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una empresa de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.