PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
4,9/10
976
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Después de luchar en la Guerra Civil, dos compañeros del ejército de la Unión se encuentran en lados opuestos de la ley con la paz de posguerra en peligro.Después de luchar en la Guerra Civil, dos compañeros del ejército de la Unión se encuentran en lados opuestos de la ley con la paz de posguerra en peligro.Después de luchar en la Guerra Civil, dos compañeros del ejército de la Unión se encuentran en lados opuestos de la ley con la paz de posguerra en peligro.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Brian F. Durkin
- Blackjack
- (as Brian Durkin)
Reseñas destacadas
This movie is a throwback to the B-westerns of yesteryear. Trouble is, those old B-westerns are feats of epic cinema compared to this 2020 version of the American Western. And it's a shame, too. Here is THE vehicle that launched many an outstanding and treasured career - Wayne, Mitchum, Stewart, McQueen, Marvin, etc . . . Only these "leading" actors forgot to do their home work. The acting is "Al-Gore-wooden-like" as each actor struggles to strike their best pose to reveal their best side as they regurgitate their canned lines. There is no emotion or meaning to their words - they're just canned lines to be said, not communicated, just said. The Shea Sizemore screenplay makes sense, but it didn't get pulled together. The score adds nothing to the movie. In fact, at times it would be best if there were no score. I lay the quality of this film at the feet of the one to blame - Director Brent Christy. I apparently have never seen a Brent Christy-directed film - I hope I don't again. This film is all over the place, chasing it's tail. Siskel & Ebert - Beware!
I almost passed over this movie because of bad reviews. I found it to be better than expected.
I love Westerns but so many of them in recent years are far too graphic for my tastes & I pass them by..This movie is worth the watch.
I love Westerns but so many of them in recent years are far too graphic for my tastes & I pass them by..This movie is worth the watch.
Why do people expect perfect acting and perfect editing to tell a good story?
The acting was good enough and the editing was okay, but the story was really good.
It was also great seeing a movie without the gratuitous sex and foul language.
Well worth the time spent to enjoy a good story about good men dealing with a bad situation.
The acting was good enough and the editing was okay, but the story was really good.
It was also great seeing a movie without the gratuitous sex and foul language.
Well worth the time spent to enjoy a good story about good men dealing with a bad situation.
Wasn't a bad movie. Subtitles kept distracting me from the story. Wasn't able to turn them off.
The Warrant DID have some value - lovely, fine horses, authentic tackle, and riders that could ACTUALLY ride, with backwoods Civil War battles between Confed and Yankee footsoldiers. There was just something a bit phony about the setup, for example Hero, John Breaker, lacked that classical taciturn-ness - opting instead for 1970s "whimsical". But I did like, Steve McQueen, (grandson of his namesake) putting in a most solid performance, a face for the Future.
¿Sabías que...?
- PifiasThis movie is set in the 1800's yet "Intel" is used - a term that only came into use in 1961.
- Citas
Cal Breaker: Well, he was your friend.
John Breaker: No he wasn't. Just because you know a man doesn't make him your friend.
- Banda sonoraBattle Hymn of the Republic
Civil war song
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is The Warrant?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Duración1 hora 24 minutos
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta