Añade un argumento en tu idiomaMusicians in the late 20th century blended guitar noise with pop structures while letting the music speak for itself. Press-shy artists now share their rule-breaking journey of sonic innovat... Leer todoMusicians in the late 20th century blended guitar noise with pop structures while letting the music speak for itself. Press-shy artists now share their rule-breaking journey of sonic innovation.Musicians in the late 20th century blended guitar noise with pop structures while letting the music speak for itself. Press-shy artists now share their rule-breaking journey of sonic innovation.
Imágenes
Reseñas destacadas
So, over the years I tried numerous times to get into some of the other shoegazing bands covered in this documentary. And no matter how I tried, I always came up with the same conclusion; 'there is a reason none of these bands ever made it big, they all suck'.
Incorporating noise, feedback, distorted guitars etc. into rock n roll was nothing new in the 1980's, as this documentary would have you believe. The Beatles first famously used feedback from George Harrison's guitar amp at the beginning of I Feel Fine. Later The Velvet Underground fully incorporated noise into their sound and did it masterfully. In the 80's, the band that was experimenting with noise but also retaining a keen sense of musicality and songcraft was Sonic Youth, who, no surprise, have had much more success and longevity than either Cocteau Twins or My Bloody Valentine.
This documentary has a kind of amateurish, half-assed feel to it, kind of like the Beautiful Noise scene it's portraying. So my predisposition to the whole movement was pretty much reinforced while watching it. Unfortunately Lush gets only a brief bit of covarage for their contributions. At least they used one of their very beautiful compositions "For Love" over the beginning of the Girls and Guys segment.
In conclusion, unless you're a real die hard fan of this scene or any of the bands covered, there is very little reason to watch this show. Even if you are a fan, they cover so many acts in such a short amount of time, you can't possibly sink your teeth into any of them to get a good handle on their music or their message. Do yourself a favour and buy a Lush album instead.
So its a vague scene for starters. I mean, where do we say "noise" started? Well, I think its OK to draw the line somewhere and just say it was Britain in 1980. Of course we know about the Velvet Underground and earlier - but this really is about "shoegaze" music (in the late 80s - early 90s), which openly revived the kinds of texture The Velvets and others explored in industrial music, but sometimes with new technology.
So the lead players are really The Cocteau Twins, Jesus And Mary Chain and My Bloody Valentine. Three hugely influential pillars of popular rock music that didn't really sell a lot of music. What this film does best is just let the musicians, engineers and studio heads speak for themselves. And what you get is not every piece of the sprawling puzzle (snobs wake-up, its impossible to explain everything about a decade of fuzzy music in one film) but a great overview of how the musicians felt about what they were doing and who influenced them. This is supported by bigger known American artists who sight these groups as influential to them.
The film doesn't have the structure and production value of something like a slick authorised Rolling Stones documentary - but thank goodness it doesn't. This was obviously a labor of love and the filmmakers obviously cared about the subject or all the significant artists wouldn't have contributed to it. A Rolling Stones (or any other big group) documentary is an authorised product these days, which means they get to cut out anything embarrassing and basically create a piece of advertising/propaganda to keep the legacy (business) going. Watch a John Lennon documentary and Yoko as the head of the Lennon estate will make sure you never know about John's previous wife.
This is definitely worth seeking out and surprisingly good.
If you are familiar with these bands you will learn nothing new and most of the interviews are cheek-slappingly banal. And even if they weren't, the cinematography is distractingly subpar: bad lighting, often out of focus, low definition. Why in the heavens is there a blu-ray edition if nothing was shot on HD!? Crappy SD footage will not look better on a blu-ray, but it sure costs more to the excited fans/suckers!
I essentially felt that I would have derived a richer experience surfing YouTube watching old interviews and live performances of the bands, as I'm sure I could find higher quality and more interesting clips that weren't either far too brief or featured for way too long.
And for a documentary about the shoegaze movement, the word "shoegaze" is never uttered, just "this period" and "these bands." I essentially felt more informed than the filmmakers.
I feel that the shoegaze movement was one of the most fascinating periods of music history and deeply deserves a fresh, beautiful, illuminating documentary. Sadly, this is not it.
¿Sabías que...?
- Citas
Robert Smith: I mean I really fell in love with the whole, with the sound, which kind of like went on, I mean it was as much Liz's voice as Robin's production, the two were kind of like seamless, and I was always really intrigued, they made it sound so effortless, that's what attracted me the most. It was kind of, the first time I'd heard this sort of you know, it was described in various ways. It was ethereal and all the other adjectives but it was really centrist, it kind of drew you in, and effortless, and you just found yourself immersed in this sound. And I played the Cocteaus like relentlessly, you know when you get to a period and you play the same albums over and over again. I could probably play most of Treasure and I've never sat down and learned it, but I just, I know it so well. In fact that was the album I played as I was getting ready for my wedding, I played it to myself as I was getting dressed on my wedding day, because it is the most romantic sound I'd ever heard.
Selecciones populares
Detalles
- Duración1 hora 27 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1