PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
4,4/10
1,3 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Con su buen amigo simio, una chica exploradora llamada Úrsula y una compañera de la selva llamada Magnolia a su lado, no hay reto demasiado grande para George, el rey de la jungla.Con su buen amigo simio, una chica exploradora llamada Úrsula y una compañera de la selva llamada Magnolia a su lado, no hay reto demasiado grande para George, el rey de la jungla.Con su buen amigo simio, una chica exploradora llamada Úrsula y una compañera de la selva llamada Magnolia a su lado, no hay reto demasiado grande para George, el rey de la jungla.
- Premios
- 5 nominaciones en total
Explorar episodios
Reseñas destacadas
Of all the shows airing on Boomerang at the moment, George of the Jungle for me is by far the worst, even more so than the very poor Inspector Gadget reboot. Anybody who is a fan of the original show, which was a childhood favourite and still is a classic, will be disgusted by this show, but films and TV shows do always deserve to be judged on their own merits, strengths and weaknesses. George of the Jungle is one of those shows that fails as a standalone, you don't even need to have seen the original show to judge this as bad.
The animation is very flat and blocky, all the characters are visually unappealing and stiff drawn, it did feel like the animators went for using as many backgrounds as possible in one episode with not enough attention given to colour or detail and the colours are so lacking in vibrancy it hurts the eyes. Sure, George of the Jungle is not the first animated show to use this style of animation but it is one of the laziest uses of it. With the music, the use of the George of the Jungle theme tune in rousing instrumental form in the end credits sequence is the only part worth listening to, the opening credits use is catchy but far too commercialised with some pretty witless rap lyrics. The rest of it is not very memorable and lacks variety.
George of the Jungle's biggest flaw is the writing. None of the original wit survives here, and the dialogue just sounds dumbed-down, horrendously cheesy and juvenile (for both children and adults), while the gags are far too rushed, like with the recent Tom and Jerry Show and with the animation here the writers seemed to pile in as many gags as possible regardless of quality. For this viewer personally, target audience was also an issue, because it struck me as too complicated for children, who will find it hard to keep up with the frenetic pace of the episodes and the execution and the gags, and adults will be embarrassed by how annoyingly juvenile it all is, people will argue that the show and the live action films were silly and they were but they also had wit and charm, with this viewer lacking either the immaturity just felt too much. The stories felt like they were written very hastily and are so lazy and sometimes repetitive it's embarrassing.
Another big failure is the characters, that they're unrecognisable from their original personalities will present a problem (Ape has none of his sophistication or refinement, something that even the live-action sequel got right, one of few things) for many but a bigger problem is that their new personalities are often annoying and are stripped of everything that made them so likable. George is far too much of a wimp and of all the characters of all the shows airing on Boomerang he is a contender for the most irritating, and Magnolia is not much better. The most tolerable of the characters is Ursula and even she's bland. The voice acting sounded shrill and overdone often, mistaking screams and shouting for manic energy, particularly Lee Tockar as George.
In conclusion, one of the few shows on Boomerang at the moment that fails on all counts. 1/10 Bethany Cox
The animation is very flat and blocky, all the characters are visually unappealing and stiff drawn, it did feel like the animators went for using as many backgrounds as possible in one episode with not enough attention given to colour or detail and the colours are so lacking in vibrancy it hurts the eyes. Sure, George of the Jungle is not the first animated show to use this style of animation but it is one of the laziest uses of it. With the music, the use of the George of the Jungle theme tune in rousing instrumental form in the end credits sequence is the only part worth listening to, the opening credits use is catchy but far too commercialised with some pretty witless rap lyrics. The rest of it is not very memorable and lacks variety.
George of the Jungle's biggest flaw is the writing. None of the original wit survives here, and the dialogue just sounds dumbed-down, horrendously cheesy and juvenile (for both children and adults), while the gags are far too rushed, like with the recent Tom and Jerry Show and with the animation here the writers seemed to pile in as many gags as possible regardless of quality. For this viewer personally, target audience was also an issue, because it struck me as too complicated for children, who will find it hard to keep up with the frenetic pace of the episodes and the execution and the gags, and adults will be embarrassed by how annoyingly juvenile it all is, people will argue that the show and the live action films were silly and they were but they also had wit and charm, with this viewer lacking either the immaturity just felt too much. The stories felt like they were written very hastily and are so lazy and sometimes repetitive it's embarrassing.
Another big failure is the characters, that they're unrecognisable from their original personalities will present a problem (Ape has none of his sophistication or refinement, something that even the live-action sequel got right, one of few things) for many but a bigger problem is that their new personalities are often annoying and are stripped of everything that made them so likable. George is far too much of a wimp and of all the characters of all the shows airing on Boomerang he is a contender for the most irritating, and Magnolia is not much better. The most tolerable of the characters is Ursula and even she's bland. The voice acting sounded shrill and overdone often, mistaking screams and shouting for manic energy, particularly Lee Tockar as George.
In conclusion, one of the few shows on Boomerang at the moment that fails on all counts. 1/10 Bethany Cox
I'll just tell you right now to swing away from this. Kids may like it due to how wacky it is but adults may not care. It's an adventure not worth embarking on. The title character's dumb which's to be expected but your character can only be dumb for so long. The other characters are smarter(some more than others).
The animation's ok. One thing I can't get over is how one eye seems bigger than the other. The stories are serviceable. I'll admit they can be clever and get a laugh. As is it's ok but not really a show I'd recommend you watch if you like the original source material. As I said before. Swing away from this.
The animation's ok. One thing I can't get over is how one eye seems bigger than the other. The stories are serviceable. I'll admit they can be clever and get a laugh. As is it's ok but not really a show I'd recommend you watch if you like the original source material. As I said before. Swing away from this.
When it came to facing danger - I saw George as being a jungle-man who clearly knew his limits.
And, just because George "sometimes" (and I do emphasize the word "sometimes") ran away (and, yes, even hid) when faced with a perilous situation, that didn't necessarily make him a coward in my eyes. I mean, George was certainly no dummy.
And, besides the George character here - I found myself somewhat puzzled by Ursula and Magnolia. Like, neither of these 2 chicks had any romantic ties with George - So, because of that - I began to seriously suspect them of being a pair of "closet" lesbians, though, of course, that sexual possibility was never really reinforced in any way.
All-in-all - I found this animated, Canadian, TV production from 2007 to be fairly entertaining, for the most part.... And, yes - George certainly was a silly, immature klutz a good part of the time - But, hey! - After all this TV program was, in fact, just a kid's cartoon.
And, just because George "sometimes" (and I do emphasize the word "sometimes") ran away (and, yes, even hid) when faced with a perilous situation, that didn't necessarily make him a coward in my eyes. I mean, George was certainly no dummy.
And, besides the George character here - I found myself somewhat puzzled by Ursula and Magnolia. Like, neither of these 2 chicks had any romantic ties with George - So, because of that - I began to seriously suspect them of being a pair of "closet" lesbians, though, of course, that sexual possibility was never really reinforced in any way.
All-in-all - I found this animated, Canadian, TV production from 2007 to be fairly entertaining, for the most part.... And, yes - George certainly was a silly, immature klutz a good part of the time - But, hey! - After all this TV program was, in fact, just a kid's cartoon.
George of the Jungle is a good cartoon that should stop being compared to it's older cartoon. George of the jungle has been said to be a show for the whole family. Who ever said that is wrong. The show is pointed towards kids the age of 3 to 12, unless you have grown up with the cartoon and still watch it online. I still do and i'm fifteen. Now in this review i'm not going to say that George of the jungle is the best cartoon ever made, but it's NOT below terrible and worse then the older George of the jungle cartoon. I'm sorry that I yelled in my last sentence, but that is to express emotion toward people who say this cartoon is bad because it's not the George they grew up with. George of the jungle (2007) is a cartoon that never has one boring moment. The show is Quite rich with comedy, and what I mean by rich comedy is that it makes jokes about what is going on the world year 2007. A special thing to note about George of the jungle is that it's the first short lived cartoon with only two season to be shown on Cartoonnetwork for over two years. I know that may not sound so special, but it really is something. There are new characters so the variety of comedy can expand. George of the jungle is cartoon that is not meant to be compared to it's older cartoon, but it's here to entertain people ,and it deserves a three episode chance before anyone can truly say it's good or bad. George of the jungle is not a great cartoon nor a decent one. I Give it a 7.8/10. P.S this George of the jungle is in a parallel universe, because this George was raised AND born in the jungle.
The most horrible show ever from 2007-2008 just like Out Of Jimmy's Head which also sucks this show is disgusting because it contains a lot of toilet humor just like Breadwinners, Sanjay And Craig, Pig Goat Banana Cricket, Fanboy And Chum Chum, Secret Mountain Fort Awesome and The Problem Solverz.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThe show had a second season that changed the original formula. George had a redesign making him stronger. Ursula and Magnolia's names were swapped. Magnolia also changed his personality to a more agressive one.
- Créditos adicionalesDuring the initial drum beats at the start of each episode, a heavily edited picture of wildlife (such as an emu with craggy teeth, a frog with lipstick, a vulture with a toupee, etc.) will appear for a split second in the title sequence.
- ConexionesFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Cartoons That Aged Badly (2000s) (2019)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How many seasons does George of the Jungle have?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta






