PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
4,8/10
3,5 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Añade un argumento en tu idiomaA young beautiful but stressed out children's writer seeks out a holiday in the country but becomes the lead character in a supernatural mystery she must solve to save her lifeA young beautiful but stressed out children's writer seeks out a holiday in the country but becomes the lead character in a supernatural mystery she must solve to save her lifeA young beautiful but stressed out children's writer seeks out a holiday in the country but becomes the lead character in a supernatural mystery she must solve to save her life
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Premios
- 2 premios en total
Louis Ferreira
- Noah Pitney
- (as Justin Louis)
William Cuddy
- Kid
- (sin acreditar)
Courtney Fitzpatrick
- Book signing Rose
- (sin acreditar)
Reseñas destacadas
Maybe it is the string of terrible horror flicks I have seen lately, but I actually liked this movie. Most of the stuff of late has been plagued with low budget effects, completely incompetent acting, and lines that made you cringe.
I don't know why so many hated this film, because the acting was good, story was decent, and effects OK. It may not be a blockbuster, but it was definitely worth watching once you have seen all of the other big name movies.
PS: My wife felt there were too many characters so it was hard to keep up with them all.
I don't know why so many hated this film, because the acting was good, story was decent, and effects OK. It may not be a blockbuster, but it was definitely worth watching once you have seen all of the other big name movies.
PS: My wife felt there were too many characters so it was hard to keep up with them all.
A Halloween movie--not terrible if you actually watch it on that Holiday, with a few drinks, as you do other things.
Not an amazing or terribly original film. Smooth and seamless special FX.
Forrest Whitaker does a very fine job...with what he is given screenplay-(and direction)wise.
Just don't expect to be amazed by the plot and execution.
No one who worked on this project should be shattered if some viewers notice that it was done for the money.
Nothing wrong with that.
Entertainment.
Not an amazing or terribly original film. Smooth and seamless special FX.
Forrest Whitaker does a very fine job...with what he is given screenplay-(and direction)wise.
Just don't expect to be amazed by the plot and execution.
No one who worked on this project should be shattered if some viewers notice that it was done for the money.
Nothing wrong with that.
Entertainment.
Claire Holloway (Gabrielle Anwar) is an author who is haunted by recurring nightmares about a house, a little girl, and THE MARSH. Claire actually locates the house from her dreams, and moves into it!
How could this possibly be a bad idea?
THE MARSH is a supernatural mystery-thriller that might remind you of POLTERGEIST or THE RING in spots. Forest Whitaker plays a helpful paranormal investigator. Both he and Ms. Anwar have an authentic quality that makes the spookiness more believable.
Overall, a pretty good ghost story...
How could this possibly be a bad idea?
THE MARSH is a supernatural mystery-thriller that might remind you of POLTERGEIST or THE RING in spots. Forest Whitaker plays a helpful paranormal investigator. Both he and Ms. Anwar have an authentic quality that makes the spookiness more believable.
Overall, a pretty good ghost story...
THE MARSH is an absolutely typical ghost story about a lonely woman moving into a lonely house that turns out to be haunted by...yada yada. The end result is that it plays out exactly as you'd expect, featuring the few unlucky actors to be caught up in this mess finding themselves at the mercy of various CGI-augmented spirits whose appearance has been crafted in the most ordinary way.
The script is poor and the direction worse, with none of the creative people involved failing to make anything of the premise. It says much that my memory of the film is already fading, at a rapid pace, a mere 24 hours after I watched it. Gabrielle Anwar (THE TUDORS) fails to bring life to a rather stiff and uninteresting lead character and seems to be trying to get her American accent right rather than delivering a decent performance. Forest Whitaker (PHONE BOOTH) appears slightly befuddled and is probably wondering what he's doing caught up in this nonsense.
Because this is nonsense, I'll make no bones about it. Every haunted house cliché in the book is played out, from the restless ghost of a kid (a little blonde girl, of course) to the vengeful spirit with the scary eyes. The jump scenes are predictable as is the rest of the plot and the effects are poor, taking you out of the movie every time they pop up. A dismal effort, this.
The script is poor and the direction worse, with none of the creative people involved failing to make anything of the premise. It says much that my memory of the film is already fading, at a rapid pace, a mere 24 hours after I watched it. Gabrielle Anwar (THE TUDORS) fails to bring life to a rather stiff and uninteresting lead character and seems to be trying to get her American accent right rather than delivering a decent performance. Forest Whitaker (PHONE BOOTH) appears slightly befuddled and is probably wondering what he's doing caught up in this nonsense.
Because this is nonsense, I'll make no bones about it. Every haunted house cliché in the book is played out, from the restless ghost of a kid (a little blonde girl, of course) to the vengeful spirit with the scary eyes. The jump scenes are predictable as is the rest of the plot and the effects are poor, taking you out of the movie every time they pop up. A dismal effort, this.
This movie is very badly written. A few things pops into mind. And i'm just writing some of the nonsense things that this movie have
1- Who are the twins? what were they doing with the 3 guys and a 1 girl?
2- Why in the hell the news papers talk about a violation of one girl, when the only thing that makes sense is to notice the missing of TWO girls, two girls are missing and the news paper talk about a raped girl? that just plain stupid. Maybe they were already ghosts (ahahah it's irony), 'cause they disappear and no one notice, there was no family, nothing. They appear from thin air. We just know that what was said to the lead part of the movie, that the parents died in a car accident. If so, was someone of the 4 kids part of her family? Of course not, the movie is just stupid...
3- The gun that kills the "rapist" (what rape?? we just see the legs of the girl during a suffocation) was in another floor of the house and appears in the closet for the little girl to use. not even gore-comedian movies are that stupid.
4- The woman (the girl that was with the 3 boys) after all that she sees goes and stays in the house to live? That's "macabre" of her part, and she doesn't seem that type. (time line error surely)
5- This is really a question. What has the picture to do with the murderer/rapist (what rape??), is it an ancestor?
The few things that make sense are weak, this was a terrible movie. And i like low budget horror movies, and many of them also has poor plots and few sense, but like this.... this is not a low budget film, and it seems that a dead-line was made and the movie makers just rushed to do one, whatever it was.
1- Who are the twins? what were they doing with the 3 guys and a 1 girl?
2- Why in the hell the news papers talk about a violation of one girl, when the only thing that makes sense is to notice the missing of TWO girls, two girls are missing and the news paper talk about a raped girl? that just plain stupid. Maybe they were already ghosts (ahahah it's irony), 'cause they disappear and no one notice, there was no family, nothing. They appear from thin air. We just know that what was said to the lead part of the movie, that the parents died in a car accident. If so, was someone of the 4 kids part of her family? Of course not, the movie is just stupid...
3- The gun that kills the "rapist" (what rape?? we just see the legs of the girl during a suffocation) was in another floor of the house and appears in the closet for the little girl to use. not even gore-comedian movies are that stupid.
4- The woman (the girl that was with the 3 boys) after all that she sees goes and stays in the house to live? That's "macabre" of her part, and she doesn't seem that type. (time line error surely)
5- This is really a question. What has the picture to do with the murderer/rapist (what rape??), is it an ancestor?
The few things that make sense are weak, this was a terrible movie. And i like low budget horror movies, and many of them also has poor plots and few sense, but like this.... this is not a low budget film, and it seems that a dead-line was made and the movie makers just rushed to do one, whatever it was.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesForest whitaker and Gabrielle Anwar also starred in the movie Body Snatchers 1993
- PifiasThe newspaper article titled "Tragedy at Rose Marsh farm" is a string of nearly the same sentences that describe the accident (a second iteration begins on line 16, a third on line 25). The entire article is poorly worded, even for a news report at that time. For example, in the second iteration, the article indicates "Denmen goes nuts." The props department obviously failed to construct a realistic article.
- Créditos adicionales"The Producers wish to thank The Tornto (sic) Film Office..."
- ConexionesReferences El resplandor (1980)
- Banda sonoraLost In Time
Written by Tim Branom
Performed by Tim Branom
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is The Marsh?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 9.000.000 US$ (estimación)
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 336 US$
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- 336 US$
- 25 mar 2007
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 2.429.573 US$
- Duración
- 1h 32min(92 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta