Kicking Bird

Alright, so I'm a liar. I haven't, technically speaking, seen Kicking Bird. Still, Meriwether is the only person I know on IMDb, and having acted alongside her since the making of the this movie, which, by the way, cost only $6,000 and was filmed in 18 days (which seems to be the only thing anyone has to say about the thing), I'm going to assume that Mandy was really cool, since no signs point in the opposite direction, and Meriwether is nothing but cool in life. In my defense, I did see the trailer, which had highly enjoyable music and may have featured a silhouette of M-Dub's hair against a black background; I'm not entirely certain. At any rate, I wish future greatness upon the whole Portland gang.

First off, as a runner this movie offended me. He (director) obviously did zero research before starting this travesty-attempt at a film. The characters were laughably terrible, and i wanted the main character to be beaten. brutally. Had he spent one tenth the time on character development that he spent using the phrase 'bud' or showing motivation montages, i might have had some reason to care what the outcome was. I walked out at about halfway, and want my life back. I'm pretty sure the budget went toward the beer bottles and hooker. This money would have been better spent on either the Honda he considered buying, or given to a charity.

First off, I saw this film FIVE YEARS AGO and still remember it as the worst film I've ever seen.

The film's premise has a lot of potential, unfortunately Baker totally fails to take advantage of that, and instead relies on hacked together clichés right up to the end. The characters are completely one-dimensional; we never get a chance to find out a solid background of any of them through the film. Character dialog is also completely forgettable, veering off into the realm of corny one-liners toward the end of the film.

Baker also doesn't seem to know how to light a scene. I mean, indie films are usually low budget/tech in the lighting department, and this film is no exception, but other directors manage to squeeze every cent out of their lighting. Not Baker. Half the time you can't actually tell what's happening in a scene from the lack of lighting. Outdoor scenes look completely washed out. Some scenes are bizarrely lit from the corners for no apparent reason, rendering the rest of the frame in darkness.

Yet another technical problem with this film was that it was shot in digital. I'm a big fan of digital, but you have to know how to use it. Scenes were flat, the frame rate was totally wrong, and the entire thing looks like it was shot on a $200 Walmart camcorder. Once again, in low budget films this is not an issue if the filmmaker knows how to make it work.

I would say this film is forgettable, but it's so terrible that it has been etched into my memory forever. Please Kelly Baker, do something useful with your money and stop wasting people's time.

I had the pleasure of seeing this film and was very impressed with all aspects of it. The story was great. I really understood the situation and characters because the writing and acting were superb. The thing that amazed me the most was the fact that this was shot on almost no budget at all. One usually has to pay good money to get the talented people that worked on this. To summarize the plot a little, it is about a kid named Martin who has a horrible home life. His parents are not around and is being raised by his grandparents. An abusive grandfather and overly tender grandmother make for a crazy dynamic in his home. His friend Digger and he are dealing with issues of breaking free of the poor lifestyle their families have been in for so long. The track coach notices that Martin outruns the rest of the track team and sees his way to a college coaching job. If you have the opportunity, find this movie and watch it.

I attended the preview of this film in Portland. The actors were not thanked though they worked for free. It was NOT filmed in 18 days, though that was the intention. It likely cost more than 6k. The writer WAS warned that his depiction of high school runners, running, and high school classes and coaching were inaccurate. He did not care. There are issues with various technical aspects, which is typical in low-budget independent films.

Despite all that, the performances are excellent.