Un ex misionero cristiano, especializado en desacreditar fenómenos religiosos, investiga un pequeño pueblo que parece estar sufriendo las 10 plagas bíblicas.Un ex misionero cristiano, especializado en desacreditar fenómenos religiosos, investiga un pequeño pueblo que parece estar sufriendo las 10 plagas bíblicas.Un ex misionero cristiano, especializado en desacreditar fenómenos religiosos, investiga un pequeño pueblo que parece estar sufriendo las 10 plagas bíblicas.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Reseñas destacadas
10/16/2024 Review. This occult movie starring two-time Oscar award winner Hilary Swank, winning these awards several years prior to this movie, has a rather obvious but devious plot thread as it builds up to its climatic scene. The slow burn is effective in what appears to be the beginning of the nine signs of the plagues of Egypt erupting in a small rural town. Hilary Swank plays Katherine Morrissey a non-believer and a former devout Christian missionary whose young daughter was brutally slain by the hands of those who believed that her sacrifice was necessary to save them from the devastation occurring in their own land. Now Swank believes in science as the way of debunking religious curses. Director Stephen Hopkins oversaw this full featured horror movie before transitioning to television series and movies and offers a solid replication of plagues on the big screen while at the same time following a script that develops an emotional intensity regarding the apparent source of evil, a girl that resembles Katherine's sacrificed daughter. The shifting tone between evil and good and the religious and moral indecision the occurs in the movie are beacons that moves this movie with substance rather superficial gore which may have been at least one reason that Hillary Swank accepting this role after her acclaim at the Oscars. A meaningful and thoughtful movie worth watching.
I remember seeing the trailer for this in the theater and saying to myself how awful this looked. Just really boring and starring Swank, who I have little or no use for. Even the name "The Reaping" I found weak, thinking it could sell more with a death metal name like "Death to the First Born". But, I am pleased to say whatever I thought of the trailer, the actual film was far more enjoyable and while nothing really mind-blowing, it definitely met my needs for a horror film.
Any time you have ten plagues visiting a town, you have a good plot already made out for you -- frogs, blood, insects and more! This story also throws in a crazy religious sect and a town secret, so if you're into cult movies (literally) you will enjoy this more. The plagues, I must say, were done very well -- from the beginning with the river of blood, I felt this film had a good shot of being a winner. I was quite disappointed with the locusts (I can let the fact they're computerized slide, but the animator made it too obvious). Other than that, it's alright...
I guess my only other concern (this is a straight-forward film, so there's not much to discuss) is the religious aspect. Religion and horror go hand in hand. There's the running themes of Christianity actually working (such as "The Exorcist"), Jesus or God being dead ("Hellraiser" and perhaps "30 Days of Night") and your religious fanatics who take God's word in a very bad way.
This film does a mixture of the first and third, and I'm not sure if I really think it works. I mean, it works for the film, but it may not work for me -- you have a horror movie that seems to have the subtle intention of making the viewer believe in God (because an atheist faces God-given plagues). Yet, you have the God in this film being a very unlikable agent (because of the plagues). So, it leaves you with very mixed feelings on whether this is a pro- or anti-religion film. But maybe the less than crystal plot is a good thing.
Anyway, while I had my doubts and I have my concerns and it's not the movie of the year by any means... this is still a good film. I think you'll be pleased with what you see. Talking with others who have seen this one, it seems to get a similar reaction from them: a disposable, yet not worthless, religious-themed horror film. If you've been curious, give it a spin.
It sets up the story with the creation of a fantastic atmosphere and the juxtaposition of science vs religion.
What really rams this movie home is the first class cast, who deliver credibility, passion and doubt.
It may have problems but I was connected enough with the movie to overlook them :)
Katherine Winter is sent to a small town with the task of solving the death of a boy. She soon finds out the river, the boy's body has been found, is red. Locals claim it's human blood, but Katherine refuses to believe.
Stephen Hopkins, a popular director, makes another movie that is almost successful, but couple of wrong decisions affect the overall result. I really can't say I was disappointed. For my surprise, Swank is not a miscast. She does a decent, believable performance. The film's major mistakes involve needless plot details that could easily annoy the viewer.
Somewhere in the middle of the film, clichés take over the action. Most of the plot ending becomes predictable. Pointless, long scenes of flashbacks, romances and dialogs contradicts the general idea of the film. The second act is almost not horror, but a rather dramatic ride through Katherine's past. It's obvious that the movie depends too much on good acting moments. Something that is not typical for horror and so, I was normally upset by the emptiness of some scenes. Emptiness, that nearly made me fall asleep.
Hopkins's movie has the premises. It isn't only the high-budget and big names to help the movie reach the theaters. The story involves element from the religion which appears to be a really big cliché these days. However, the structure of the film remains balanced thanks to the good writing. The idea of Katherine's personal nightmares, being a barrier between reality and illusion fits perfectly into the plot.
There are also some great visuals that recreate a feeling of realistic terror.
The Reaping could have been better, but still, it deserves a look. There are some impressive scenes, I'm sure all whimsical horror fans will like.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThe film portrays the city of Concepción, Chile, as a warm, tropical, Third World small town. This caused a furor in Concepción, with people walking out of the theaters and others calling for authorities to ban the movies.
- PifiasThe city shown as "Concepción, Chile," at the beginning of the movie is nothing like the real location. Concepción is located along a river (the Bíobío), not a sea, and has a cold and rainy climate, many modern buildings (especially in the city center, where the cathedral is located), and no heavy industry. Additionally, the Chilean police uniform is dark green, with long jackets and boots and no beret, and Chilean police and Armed Forces personnel are not allowed to wear beards, only mustaches with superior officer approval.
- Citas
Katherine Winter: In 1400 B.C., a group of nervous Egyptians saw the Nile turn red. But what they thought was blood was actually an algae bloom which killed the fish, which prior to that had been living off the eggs of frogs. Those uneaten eggs turned into record numbers of baby frogs who subsequently fled to the land and died. Their little rotting frog bodies attracted lice and flies. The lice carried the bluetongue virus, which killed 70% of Egypt's livestock. The flies carried glanders, a bacterial infection which in humans causes boils. Soon afterwards, the Nile River Valley was hit with a three-day sandstorm otherwise known as the plague of darkness. During the sandstorm, intense heat can combine with an approaching cold front to create not only hail, but also electrical storms which would have looked to the ancient Egyptians like fire from the sky. The subsequent wind would have blown the Ethiopian locust population off course and right into downtown Cairo. Hail is wet, locusts leave droppings, spread both on grain, and you have got mycotoxins. Dinnertime in ancient Egypt meant the first-born child got the biggest portion, which in this case, meant he ate the most toxins, so he died. Ten plagues. Ten scientific explanations.
- Créditos adicionalesThe opening logos are unique and blend into one another: a red Warner Bros. logo crumbles into dust to reveal a pink-tinted Village Roadshow Pictures logo, which in turn is obscured by clouds that part to reveal the Dark Castle Entertainment logo.
- Banda sonoraTell Me What I Did Wrong
Written by James Brown
Performed by James Brown
Courtesy of Universal Records
Under license from Universal Music Enterprises
Selecciones populares
- How long is The Reaping?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idiomas
- Títulos en diferentes países
- La sega
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 40.000.000 US$ (estimación)
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 25.126.214 US$
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- 10.025.203 US$
- 8 abr 2007
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 62.771.059 US$
- Duración
- 1h 39min(99 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.39 : 1