PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
5,3/10
520
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Añade un argumento en tu idiomaIn this animated adaptation of the Tomb of Dracula comic book series, Dracula assumes control of a satanic cult and fathers a child through one of his followers, but the forces of both good ... Leer todoIn this animated adaptation of the Tomb of Dracula comic book series, Dracula assumes control of a satanic cult and fathers a child through one of his followers, but the forces of both good and evil align themselves against him.In this animated adaptation of the Tomb of Dracula comic book series, Dracula assumes control of a satanic cult and fathers a child through one of his followers, but the forces of both good and evil align themselves against him.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
Kenji Utsumi
- Dracula
- (voz)
Hiroko Suzuki
- Domini
- (voz)
Kazuyuki Sogabe
- Janus
- (voz)
Mami Koyama
- Rachel
- (voz)
Keiichi Noda
- Drake
- (voz)
- (as Kei'ichi Noda)
Reiko Katsura
- Lilith
- (voz)
Ryo Ishihara
- Narrator
- (voz)
Kôji Totani
- Wheeler
- (voz)
Seiko Nakano
- Mallisa
- (voz)
Satomi Majima
- Girl
- (voz)
Yasuo Tanaka
- Torgo
- (voz)
- (as Yasurô Tanaka)
Jamie Johnston
- Billy
- (English version)
- (voz)
Stan Jones
- Narrator
- (English version)
- (voz)
Ted Layman
- Dracula
- (English version)
- (voz)
Reseñas destacadas
I love Marvel Comics. I love all the shows (for the most part) and the movies (again, mostly). I find the characters incredibly interesting and love to know about it. I'm particularly interested in animation. I had read all about Marvel's modern animated movies, but learned that there were two relatively unknown movies: Dracula and The Monster of Frankenstein. Marvel and Toei Animation made a deal to make several of their properties, but those were the only two produced.
Dracula is inspired by The Tomb of Dracula. The comic features Dracula's grandson finding his body and encountering vampire hunters like Blade. I picked up a collected edition and it's quite...odd to say the least (it was the 70s). This film is loosely inspired by the comics and features a few of the characters, but greatly alters the story. Oddly enough, the comics weren't available in Japan at the time so it's an odd choice that this was made above Fantastic Four, Spider-Man, or Hulk.
The film follows both Dracula and his grandson Drake. Dracula meets a woman, falls in love, and has a child. Drake meets a team of vampire hunters and searches for his grandfather. Satan, angry at Dracula for stealing his bride, plans to destroy the vampire lord. The meeting of the three stories eventually leads to a big climatic showdown.
The tone is all over the place. There's a lot of late 70s and early 80s camp, silly hairstyles, plot devices that stretch believability, and other problems that were common in anime at the time. On the other hand, there's a lot of dark stuff. Early on, Dracula graphically kills two women on screen. There's a flashback to his days of Vlad the Impaler which is more historically accurate than most other screen versions (violence-wise). Some of the characters even take a side-trip to Hell. And one female character appears fully naked from the side. I wouldn't say it's scary, but there's a shot of birds picking at dead bodies on pikes (hence the real-life Vlad's nickname) that could be disturbing. I actually applaud the darker elements. That's something almost no one in animation deals with. The problem is, the campier elements make it too silly for adults but the sex and violence make it a bit much for children.
The voice acting is, again, standard for anime at the time. Unless it was Disney or Don Bluth, no one took animation seriously and certainly not anime (Akira being nearly a decade away). At the time, translations were done quickly and cheaply. It seemed that the same ten people did everything anime. The voices work for their purposes but not a one is anything more than adequate.
The animation is astounding. Anime has always featured terrific animation. Characters look realistic, not the oversized hands and eyes that American animation often has. There's a great richness to the images and backgrounds. Lots of interesting looking set pieces, even for tiny little scenes or just single shots. They do have the occasional problem, but it was typical to cheat every once in a while.
Dracula is an interesting tale. I would recommend it to anime and/or Marvel buffs looking for something different. There's actually a lot of interesting ideas. For example, Dracula resents his life as a vampire and his need to consume people, though Let the Right One In would do that idea better. If only this movie was simply a better movie. There's simply too many problems to take this seriously.
Dracula is inspired by The Tomb of Dracula. The comic features Dracula's grandson finding his body and encountering vampire hunters like Blade. I picked up a collected edition and it's quite...odd to say the least (it was the 70s). This film is loosely inspired by the comics and features a few of the characters, but greatly alters the story. Oddly enough, the comics weren't available in Japan at the time so it's an odd choice that this was made above Fantastic Four, Spider-Man, or Hulk.
The film follows both Dracula and his grandson Drake. Dracula meets a woman, falls in love, and has a child. Drake meets a team of vampire hunters and searches for his grandfather. Satan, angry at Dracula for stealing his bride, plans to destroy the vampire lord. The meeting of the three stories eventually leads to a big climatic showdown.
The tone is all over the place. There's a lot of late 70s and early 80s camp, silly hairstyles, plot devices that stretch believability, and other problems that were common in anime at the time. On the other hand, there's a lot of dark stuff. Early on, Dracula graphically kills two women on screen. There's a flashback to his days of Vlad the Impaler which is more historically accurate than most other screen versions (violence-wise). Some of the characters even take a side-trip to Hell. And one female character appears fully naked from the side. I wouldn't say it's scary, but there's a shot of birds picking at dead bodies on pikes (hence the real-life Vlad's nickname) that could be disturbing. I actually applaud the darker elements. That's something almost no one in animation deals with. The problem is, the campier elements make it too silly for adults but the sex and violence make it a bit much for children.
The voice acting is, again, standard for anime at the time. Unless it was Disney or Don Bluth, no one took animation seriously and certainly not anime (Akira being nearly a decade away). At the time, translations were done quickly and cheaply. It seemed that the same ten people did everything anime. The voices work for their purposes but not a one is anything more than adequate.
The animation is astounding. Anime has always featured terrific animation. Characters look realistic, not the oversized hands and eyes that American animation often has. There's a great richness to the images and backgrounds. Lots of interesting looking set pieces, even for tiny little scenes or just single shots. They do have the occasional problem, but it was typical to cheat every once in a while.
Dracula is an interesting tale. I would recommend it to anime and/or Marvel buffs looking for something different. There's actually a lot of interesting ideas. For example, Dracula resents his life as a vampire and his need to consume people, though Let the Right One In would do that idea better. If only this movie was simply a better movie. There's simply too many problems to take this seriously.
Before Marvel studios took on Frankenstein we got this Dracula piece that left me pining for Dr Strange (2016) which I thought was the absolute pits.
Alike The Monster Of Frankenstein (1981) this was made by Marvels Japanese animation studio however strangely looks very western.
It tells the story of Dracula, the woman he loves, their children, Satan (Yes Satan) and the group determined to see him dead.
I'm struggling to find the words to explain just how bad this is. It's tacky, full of laughable dialogue, pitiful characters and an awful storyline.
Unlike Frankenstein this is a very PG affair. Sadly it's not exactly family friendly, won't appeal to the kids and I'd imagine most adults will find it juvenile.
The movie was so bad it made my nuts rattle, both of them!
The Good:
Animation is decent enough
The Bad:
Dracula looks ridiculous
A lot of cheese
No idea who the demographic is
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
Marvels cinematic road to where they are now was one fraught with embarrassment
Alike The Monster Of Frankenstein (1981) this was made by Marvels Japanese animation studio however strangely looks very western.
It tells the story of Dracula, the woman he loves, their children, Satan (Yes Satan) and the group determined to see him dead.
I'm struggling to find the words to explain just how bad this is. It's tacky, full of laughable dialogue, pitiful characters and an awful storyline.
Unlike Frankenstein this is a very PG affair. Sadly it's not exactly family friendly, won't appeal to the kids and I'd imagine most adults will find it juvenile.
The movie was so bad it made my nuts rattle, both of them!
The Good:
Animation is decent enough
The Bad:
Dracula looks ridiculous
A lot of cheese
No idea who the demographic is
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
Marvels cinematic road to where they are now was one fraught with embarrassment
This is a Japanese Marvel Comics Dracula animated movie. I liked the animation style, but the story is silly. Satanist cult vs Count Dracula in love vs Vampire Hunters in Boston. Things are not well developed and there are many cheesy melodramatic moments and parts with excess of narration. The eventual miracle and Janus's story (and his very concept) make the film worsens. Dracula eating a hamburger in New York exemplifies well how poor the script becomes. On the other hand, I did like Lilith, and it would be nice if this character had more screen time. The film would also be better if it had less melodrama and more horror atmosphere such as in the first 14 minutes or later with the zombie vampires.
Count Dracula, fed up with being constantly pursued by European vampire hunters, moves to USA. But when he finds a Satan-worshipping cult, he loses his power he finds himself against past undead acquaintances, also vampire hunters Hans Harker and Rachel Van Helsing along with Satan himself.
Tomb of Dracula, aka Dracula and Dracula: Sovereign Of The Damned might be better than anything Marvel has to offer these days. Produced by Toei Animation, the film was part of a deal between Marvel and Toei in the 1970s. Dracula: Sovereign of The Damned, adapted The Tomb of Dracula comic series published from 1972 to 1979, and attempts to cram the plot elements of the comic series into 94 minutes. First broadcast on TV Asahi in 1980, it appeared on cable networks, VHS and Betamax in the early 80s.
A few lapses in logic aside, the plot has plenty to offer, with lots vampire lore, action and abilities on display throughout. It's a little hammy at times, mainly due to the voice dubbing and some narration. Nevertheless, the traditional art & animation and Hammer Horror-like score delivers nostalgic joy, there's classic horror themes, sound stings, also disco music in the night club scenes. Directors Akinori Nagaoka and Minoru Okazaki offer great visuals, violence, ample blood, sexually charged scenes and even some nudity. There's many story elements, sacrifices to Satan, love, fatherhood, even being devampirised and reduced to eating hamburgers. The character design is holds up. Memorably there's a creepy graveyard scene where the dead come to life and a fang-full of notable vampire attacks that capture the feel of the comics.
Overall, great horror fun, especially for an over 40 years old made-for-television release. Highly recommended.
Tomb of Dracula, aka Dracula and Dracula: Sovereign Of The Damned might be better than anything Marvel has to offer these days. Produced by Toei Animation, the film was part of a deal between Marvel and Toei in the 1970s. Dracula: Sovereign of The Damned, adapted The Tomb of Dracula comic series published from 1972 to 1979, and attempts to cram the plot elements of the comic series into 94 minutes. First broadcast on TV Asahi in 1980, it appeared on cable networks, VHS and Betamax in the early 80s.
A few lapses in logic aside, the plot has plenty to offer, with lots vampire lore, action and abilities on display throughout. It's a little hammy at times, mainly due to the voice dubbing and some narration. Nevertheless, the traditional art & animation and Hammer Horror-like score delivers nostalgic joy, there's classic horror themes, sound stings, also disco music in the night club scenes. Directors Akinori Nagaoka and Minoru Okazaki offer great visuals, violence, ample blood, sexually charged scenes and even some nudity. There's many story elements, sacrifices to Satan, love, fatherhood, even being devampirised and reduced to eating hamburgers. The character design is holds up. Memorably there's a creepy graveyard scene where the dead come to life and a fang-full of notable vampire attacks that capture the feel of the comics.
Overall, great horror fun, especially for an over 40 years old made-for-television release. Highly recommended.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesDracula: Sovereign of the Damned was one of the last productions in Japan made from Toei's license with Marvel that saw them make Spider-Man and the first three seasons of super sentai. However, Toei went on to produce much of Marvel Productions' animation for the rest of that decade.
- PifiasNear the end of the film after Dracula fails to become a vampire again the blood on his face disappears and reappears between shots.
- ConexionesFeatured in Anime Abandon: Dracula: Sovereign of the Damned (2012)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was La tumba de Drácula (1980) officially released in India in English?
Responde