[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario de lanzamientosLas 250 mejores películasPelículas más popularesExplorar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y ticketsNoticias sobre películasNoticias destacadas sobre películas de la India
    Qué hay en la TV y en streamingLas 250 mejores seriesProgramas de televisión más popularesExplorar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    ¿Qué verÚltimos tráileresOriginales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchPremios STARmeterCentral de premiosCentral de festivalesTodos los eventos
    Personas nacidas hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias de famosos
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de seguimiento
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar la aplicación
Atrás
  • Reparto y equipo
  • Reseñas de usuarios
  • Curiosidades
IMDbPro
Dr. Moreau's House of Pain (2004)

Reseñas de usuarios

Dr. Moreau's House of Pain

18 reseñas
5/10

This is a fairly average addition to the horror genre that could have been better but is still worth a viewing

Dr. Moreau's House of Pain (2004) is a Full Moon Feature I recently watched on Tubi. The storyline follows a man looking for his brother who stumbles onto a clinic where human and animal DNA is getting mixed to create new creations. Once the young man stumbles into the clinic will he ever be able to get out?

This movie is directed by Charles Band (Puppet Master) and stars John Patrick Jordan (Them), Jessica Lancaster (The Forgotten), Peter Donald Badalamenti II (Bad Boys II), Lorielle New (Farewell, My Love) and Debra Mayer (Blood Dolls).

The storyline and era this takes place in had a lot of potential. The makeup and masks were excellent but the acting wasn't. The opening strip club scene and cat/human creature were gold, even if the cat's sex scenes were just okay. The soundtrack was very good also. There was some good kill scenes and gore sprinkled in throughout the movie.

Overall this is a fairly average addition to the horror genre that could have been better but is still worth a viewing. I would score this a 5/10 and recommend seeing it once.
  • kevin_robbins
  • 22 feb 2022
  • Enlace permanente
3/10

More cheap crap from Charl s Band.

  • poolandrews
  • 29 ene 2010
  • Enlace permanente

Catwoman in heat

  • Dr. Gore
  • 29 jun 2004
  • Enlace permanente
2/10

Even worse than the Marlon Brando version

  • JoeB131
  • 11 oct 2023
  • Enlace permanente
1/10

i'd rather eat poo

worst movie i ever saw. period. i am not kidding around here. i bought the movie used because i figured a movie with a pig-man on the cover had to be hilariously bad. me and some friends tried watching it but everything about the movie was so terrible we had to turn it off. the acting was poor at best. the characters were morons. (who would have sex with a pig man and expect it to keep a promise of freedom?) the monsters were inconsistent, in one shot it would be covered in slime-garbage and the next it would be dry. i actually had to force myself at a later time to watch the whole thing just to see how bad it was. i actually felt sick after watching this movie which has never before or since happened. this DVD became a thing we would trick people into getting it among me and my friends, i hid it in a big stuffed animal, sewed it back up and gave the stuffed animal to a friend. after awhile he discovered what i had done when i began to hint at it. he tried to get a family member to wrap it up and give it to me for xmas but my brother discovered the plot due to carelessness of my mother so my friend drove past another friends house and threw it on his lawn. it got back to my first friend somehow and he threw it in the trash, right were this movie belongs.
  • mkruis1
  • 5 abr 2007
  • Enlace permanente
1/10

Did I see the same movie?

I cannot imagine how any sane human being could enjoy this film. Its insane crappiness induces vomiting. A man with giant knees would make more sense than the monsters in this film. Don't get me wrong, I like my share of cheesy movies, but this one was just too awful even for me. I watched this movie hoping for a fun and amusing horror flick. What I received was one of the worst moments in my life. At one point during the movie I convinced myself that if the movie did not end in less than 10 minutes, i would jam a fork in my eye. I urge anyone who finds this film on a store shelf to buy it, break it into 1000 tiny pieces, and scatter them across the ocean. If not for me, do it for the children.
  • boristheblade7
  • 5 abr 2007
  • Enlace permanente
2/10

A dog of a movie

  • Leofwine_draca
  • 31 ene 2019
  • Enlace permanente
1/10

Worst movie ever

you know a movie is bad when the beginning credits are made using Windows Movie Maker software. The make up was horrible the acting was worse. My girlfriend bought it used so i wasn't too upset besides i like watching semi-bad horror movies so that i can have a little laugh, but this movie was so bad that it became frustrating. I think the movie was supposed to take place in the 30's but for some reason you really cant even tell. They should make murderers and rapist watch this movie everyday in prison as a punishment. Well at least they have stores that let you trade movies. Im just surprised that they would even give me store credit for this crap.
  • Mrpopo-1
  • 24 nov 2007
  • Enlace permanente
1/10

10 stars?????? No!! Negative 10 stars. And that is still too many!

  • alex_l_johnston
  • 18 abr 2007
  • Enlace permanente
8/10

Quality low-budget horror.

Brisk/credible script, the small cast give good performances and the prosthetics and photography work well too. I picked this up for a £1, so expectations weren't exactly sky-high and the Full Moon logo can sometimes spell 'AVOID', - I was very pleasantly surprised. Earl Kenton did a great job with the script, and recognised the budget limitations his story would work within. He has created a small, dark and believable realm. All the actors, (particularly Jacob Witkin and Lorielle New) give very watchable interpretations and transcend the usual standard of performance you expect from this type of film. 'House of Pain' reminded me of two other great films - Stuart Gordon's classic 'Dagon', and the recent remake of 'She Creature'. Good stuff.
  • joelgriggs
  • 7 dic 2007
  • Enlace permanente
7/10

Nice Surprise.

Director Charles Band has pulled off a terrific bit of sleight of hand in Dr. Moreau's House of Pain. Yes there are Pig People, guts and gore, lots of nudity etc., etc., but what makes this little film special is that Band has made a terrific homage to the film noir films of the forties. Color, (did he use technicolor? the color is perfect), costumes, hair styles and dialogue are all out of 1947, and the actors play their parts as though they were Alan Ladd, Gail Russell and Lizabeth Scott! The premise is silly in this the what, fourth go-round of a Dr.Moreau film, but the execution, (no pun intended), is really top notch and on a par with much more expensive films.

Congrats Charles Band and all who worked on this film. Not to sound too 1940's, but you all did a "swell" job!
  • rube2424
  • 28 ago 2004
  • Enlace permanente

A very well made, interesting movie...

If your goal is to rent something bad and critique it then go find a TROMA film and have at it! If, on the other hand you like being pleasantly surprised at what can be done on a low budget then this film is an excellent example.

Charles Band is- an inconsistent director. Some of the films he's done are crap but others are Brilliant and explain his high status in the industry. Dr. Moraeu's House of Pancakes is a very watchable very enjoyable film with better than average Make-up fx and NO CG! not any to speak of anyway. The Make-up effects while conceived by old favorite John Buechler are fleshy and visceral and more than competently done by Veteran Bruce Barlow considering the budget and shooting schedule. Sets and art direction are key to what make this such a fun watchable movie and Mac Ahlberg's lighting and photography bring this to the caliber of many of it's bigger budgeted rivals. Judge for yourself!
  • blairmonster
  • 16 ago 2009
  • Enlace permanente
8/10

THIS IS NOT A MAD HOUSE

  • nogodnomasters
  • 23 abr 2019
  • Enlace permanente
7/10

A return to glory?

Director Charles Band has walked a long way on the hard road of independent horror film-making. He has given us as many good movies as he has done awful ones, but the only thing sure in his work is that he is completely dedicated to the genre he loves.

With that said I must start saying that I was not expecting much of this movie, not only because of Band's uneven record, the main problem Full Moon has had in the last years has been the unbelievably low budget they use. I was expecting something really awful considering that the movie was loosely based in the really SFX-demanding novel "Island of Dr. Moreau" by H.G. Wells. I was really wrong.

Set around the 30s (the exact date is never given), the plot follows Eric Carson (John Patrick Jordan), a low profile boxer who is looking for his missing brother. In his quest he is joined by his brother's lover Judith(Jessica Lancaster) and their friend Mary Anne (Debra Mayer), who is a reporter always searching for the next exclusive. While following a clue in a bar, they get involved with a stripper named Alliana (Loriele New) who lures them to an abandoned Asylum. They will find Dr. Moreau (Jacob Witkin) and his collection of the creatures he calls "Manimals".

The most amazing feature of the film is the way it handled the budget to make the film REALLY look like it's set in the 30s. Band outdid himself this time as he really cared about things like scenery, music and props. He even recreated the look of film noir. The lighting and editing of the film is superb. I dare to say that it is among the best movies Band has directed, technically speaking.

The Make-Up for the Manimals and the overall SFX are a bit bad, but the story makes up for it; the script is surprisingly good and the characters are quite developed which is a good change from typical B-Movies.

The acting is above average, and while John Patrick Jordan struggles at times, the rest of the cast makes a good job, particularly Peter D. Badalamenti II as rebel Manimal Gallagher. Lorielle New as the sexy Alliene has good scenes, and shows plenty of nudity, for those interested.

Overall it was a good movie that was hurt hard by its lack of budget, nevertheless Charles Band proves that when he wants it, he still can make a good movie once or twice. 7/10. Nice Surprise indeed.
  • jluis1984
  • 22 ene 2006
  • Enlace permanente
6/10

Breasts and beasts

  • smellthecult-com-1
  • 23 ene 2010
  • Enlace permanente

Pretty Bad Adaptation

Dr. Moreau's House of Pain (2004)

* (out of 4)

Eric Carson (John Patrick Jordan) goes looking for his brother who has gone missing after visiting Dr. Moreau (Jacob Witkin). Pretty soon he sees the horrible creations caused by the doctor as well as getting lucky with the sexy panther woman (Lorielle New).

DR. MOREAU'S HOUSE OF PAIN is pretty much what you'd expect out of a low-budget movie from Charles Band. If you're familiar with Band's work then you should know what to expect here. You've basically got a very low-budget movie that is "borrowing" from countless other films. Obviously this one here is a take-off on the H.W. Wells but one shouldn't be expecting anything like previous versions of the story.

The film's small budget seems to have had most of the money spent on the actual look of the film. It's quite colorful and I must admit that it looked rather good. The biggest problem with the film is its overall tone, which is just bad and not all that entertaining. Even worse are some of the special effects and the creatures just aren't all that believable. Even worse is that you really just don't care about the lead character, his brother or any of his problems.

I will say that the one saving grace was the performance by New. Obviously she's a very beautiful woman and her nude scenes are a welcome but I thought she was also good in the role.
  • Michael_Elliott
  • 15 ene 2017
  • Enlace permanente
7/10

A generally fun if somewhat flawed adaptation of the story

Searching for a hot story, a reporter joins a boxer and his girlfriend in searching for a missing friend of theirs and eventually stumbles upon a mysterious doctor harvesting victims for experiments in human/animal hybrids and must try to stop the doctor before they're the next victims.

Overall, this one was much better than expected. What works really well here is the interesting setup which works well enough on its own but has much more to like due to the period setting. That means the start of this one with the reporter looking for the big break and stumbling into the story by following the stranger from the nightclub becomes more intriguing once they find the strange mansion hideout. Offering enough twists through its inclusion of sleazier storytelling but keeping enough points from the classic story from how they stumble into the creatures, this becomes a decent starting point. This setup provides the kind of cheesy creature confrontations not just with the creations but with the doctor. The means of their capture at the mansion and subjection to the preparations that take place focus heavily on the sight and presence of the creatures keeping them in check while trying to figure out the doctors' plans. As this goes on, the finale where the escapes and double-crosses take place which leads to a lot of fun and bloody brawling involving the humans and the mutants left alive which has the advantage not only of the graphic outcomes but the effects work all giving this a cheesy vibe. These features are what manage to make this one enjoyable while there are some issues with this one. The main issue here is the films' penchant for speechifying over graphic creature carnage which causes several side factors to emerge. Not only does that approach keep the energy down and the kills barely noticeable for long stretches of time, but it also means that there are a lot of technical issues with the surgery glossed over so that it never really makes sense how they are preferred or how everything went down in that location undetected. As well, there's also the fact that this leaves us with long, uninterrupted looks at the animal masks being used which really aren't that convincing. These factors are what hold this one back.

Rated R: Graphic Violence, Graphic Language, Full Nudity, and Sex Scenes.
  • kannibalcorpsegrinder
  • 1 oct 2022
  • Enlace permanente

what were they thinking?

  • andrewpgillies
  • 10 nov 2011
  • Enlace permanente

Más de este título

Más por descubrir

Visto recientemente

Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
Obtener la aplicación IMDb
Inicia sesión para tener más accesoInicia sesión para tener más acceso
Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
Obtener la aplicación IMDb
Para Android e iOS
Obtener la aplicación IMDb
  • Ayuda
  • Índice del sitio
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • Licencia de datos de IMDb
  • Sala de prensa
  • Anuncios
  • Empleos
  • Condiciones de uso
  • Política de privacidad
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, una empresa de Amazon

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.