Un científico (Gerald McRaney) perfecciona un sistema de alerta de tornados e intenta convencer a los residentes de un pueblo cercano de que se acerca un tornado mortal.Un científico (Gerald McRaney) perfecciona un sistema de alerta de tornados e intenta convencer a los residentes de un pueblo cercano de que se acerca un tornado mortal.Un científico (Gerald McRaney) perfecciona un sistema de alerta de tornados e intenta convencer a los residentes de un pueblo cercano de que se acerca un tornado mortal.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
Rhiannon Benedict
- Norma
- (as Valerie Wynne)
David Lawrence Brown
- Sheriff Miller
- (as Dave Brown)
Gordon Tanner
- Stormchaser #1
- (as Gord Tanner)
Marina Stephenson Kerr
- June
- (as Marina Stephenson-Kerr)
Reseñas destacadas
Sorry, but if I try to give people info that'll save their lives, and not only do they NOT wanna hear it, they take a dismissive attitude toward me, I'm not gonna risk jail or my own safety to keep trying to save them from themselves! Letting people like that die due to their own stupidity is natural selection at its very finest! In my version of the movie, the folks who do take the warning seriously shelter, and all the rest are pulled limb from limb by the twister. I'd certainly have all sorts of mannequin limbs with ketchup and other goo as part of the special effects *lol*. Gerald McRaney's talents were definitely wasted on this turkey of a film!
This movie was a complete and total embarrassment. I couldn't believe how
cheap and awful it was. I mean, just ridiculous. Why would PAX bother to make a movie that's so horrific and embarrassing when they could probably get the
same ratings airing their reruns of Touched by an Angel and Diagnosis Murder
instead? If anyone sees this, the film's representation of a "parade" (this small town's annual celebration/parade are endangered by an approaching tornado)
is truly pathetic. It's one of those movie parades where all you seem to see is the trail end of it -- in one shot they show one lone clown walking along as if that constitutes a parade. And they have about 10 extras watching the parade as if that's the entire town.
Joan Van Ark tries hard, but she clearly received very poor direction. Her comic take on her drawling character just doesn't fit with the rest of the movie, which takes itself fairly seriously. This movie to me is the nadir of what the
once-awesome TV-movie has degenerated into. Look what the genre that gave
us The Burning Bed and Brian's Song has ultimately become... a cheap way for
a cheap network like PAX to fill airtime. Depressing.
cheap and awful it was. I mean, just ridiculous. Why would PAX bother to make a movie that's so horrific and embarrassing when they could probably get the
same ratings airing their reruns of Touched by an Angel and Diagnosis Murder
instead? If anyone sees this, the film's representation of a "parade" (this small town's annual celebration/parade are endangered by an approaching tornado)
is truly pathetic. It's one of those movie parades where all you seem to see is the trail end of it -- in one shot they show one lone clown walking along as if that constitutes a parade. And they have about 10 extras watching the parade as if that's the entire town.
Joan Van Ark tries hard, but she clearly received very poor direction. Her comic take on her drawling character just doesn't fit with the rest of the movie, which takes itself fairly seriously. This movie to me is the nadir of what the
once-awesome TV-movie has degenerated into. Look what the genre that gave
us The Burning Bed and Brian's Song has ultimately become... a cheap way for
a cheap network like PAX to fill airtime. Depressing.
This is one of the better made-for-TV tornado movies I have seen. Like most of these movies, they save all the tornado action for the last part of the movie. This movie had a pretty decent plot, and some known actors. Sadly, like all if not most tornado movies, the producers did not get their tornado and weather facts right. The part where they give a tornado warning, no one heads for shelter. When a tornado warning is issued it means that a tornado or funnel cloud has been witnessed by a person, or detected on radar and the people in the path of the storm should seek shelter IMMEDIATELY. The movie takes place in Oklahoma, which is in the heart of tornado alley, and the people of the town did not take any sort of action when the warning was issued.
Not a bad movie, I would watch it again.
Not a bad movie, I would watch it again.
I read one comment about this movie and...
The poster is right about ONE thing. Joan van Ark act is excessive, thus not believable enough.
But if you know America - and I mean REALLY KNOW - then you must have come across town mayors that really behave quite similarly to what she portrays. If you know America, you know that in some towns/areas/professions one is not allowed free speech, and people like van Ark's character really use their powers to silence people or news.
Special effects wise, this movie is quite good, though it is obvious that its budget was very small. Tornadoes are shown with solid, firm, believable special effects.
The characters are solid (exception made of van Ark's and perhaps of the Storm Chasers leader) and are engaged in real world problems.
Plot is, perhaps, the main problem. It's as if this movie was made by a group of scientists or storm chasers who vowed to put on screen their troubles related to: - chasing and predicting tornadoes - and, probably, the funds for their activities.
It is a VERY SIMPLE plot.
And because of this, it is predictable AND believable at the same time. Some people watched this as if they were watching a Discovery Channel's Storm Chasers big episode with a more intimate, behind-the-camera closer look at the main players.
Acting is...a mix.
Gerald McRaney is OK, quite solid in his portrayal of a discredited scientist.
Steve Braun is a good surprise. A timid, sensitive and wise young scientist/student. Good acting.
Thea Gil swings back and forth between convincing and non-committed acting. Good actors are known to be convincing throughout the repertoire or their characters - and that's what separates them from the average actors/actresses.
David Millbern's act was not convincing, hesitant, foolish at times. I have seen better from him, I'm sure.
The rest of the cast is good enough, though Joan van Ark's actions seem exaggerated and unbelievable.
In terms of the science behind it, this movie is one of the few that portrays the "attack" of tornadoes as they really are - short, loud and violent. The physical content (cloud formation, wind speeds, debris hurling, sky colors, pressure gradients, etc) is pretty much spot on.
Is there something that differentiates this movie from others of similar vein? Yes. Simple, dry and direct plot and the crude atmosphere of small towns and tornado attacks.
It could have been better, sure. But the striking thing is, it could have been MUCH, MUCH WORSE.
The poster is right about ONE thing. Joan van Ark act is excessive, thus not believable enough.
But if you know America - and I mean REALLY KNOW - then you must have come across town mayors that really behave quite similarly to what she portrays. If you know America, you know that in some towns/areas/professions one is not allowed free speech, and people like van Ark's character really use their powers to silence people or news.
Special effects wise, this movie is quite good, though it is obvious that its budget was very small. Tornadoes are shown with solid, firm, believable special effects.
The characters are solid (exception made of van Ark's and perhaps of the Storm Chasers leader) and are engaged in real world problems.
Plot is, perhaps, the main problem. It's as if this movie was made by a group of scientists or storm chasers who vowed to put on screen their troubles related to: - chasing and predicting tornadoes - and, probably, the funds for their activities.
It is a VERY SIMPLE plot.
And because of this, it is predictable AND believable at the same time. Some people watched this as if they were watching a Discovery Channel's Storm Chasers big episode with a more intimate, behind-the-camera closer look at the main players.
Acting is...a mix.
Gerald McRaney is OK, quite solid in his portrayal of a discredited scientist.
Steve Braun is a good surprise. A timid, sensitive and wise young scientist/student. Good acting.
Thea Gil swings back and forth between convincing and non-committed acting. Good actors are known to be convincing throughout the repertoire or their characters - and that's what separates them from the average actors/actresses.
David Millbern's act was not convincing, hesitant, foolish at times. I have seen better from him, I'm sure.
The rest of the cast is good enough, though Joan van Ark's actions seem exaggerated and unbelievable.
In terms of the science behind it, this movie is one of the few that portrays the "attack" of tornadoes as they really are - short, loud and violent. The physical content (cloud formation, wind speeds, debris hurling, sky colors, pressure gradients, etc) is pretty much spot on.
Is there something that differentiates this movie from others of similar vein? Yes. Simple, dry and direct plot and the crude atmosphere of small towns and tornado attacks.
It could have been better, sure. But the striking thing is, it could have been MUCH, MUCH WORSE.
Another terrible made-for-TV disaster flick from director Tibor Takacs. This one starts out EXACTLY the same as another I saw, with a young girl losing her parents to a twister and then growing up to become a storm chaser some 20 years later, although - unsurprisingly - I can't remember the title of that previous film. They all roll into one anyway.
TORNADO WARNING might as well have been called 'Storm Chasers the Movie', because that's exactly what this is: a film that follows the adventures of various rival storm chasing groups as they attempt to tackle the big one. The running time is mixed between lame scenes of actors overacting and really low budget storm set-pieces. Needless to say, rubbishy-looking CGI is the order of the day here.
The cast is headed by various ageing actresses who once had fame in the likes of KNOT'S LANDING before being reduced to this level of fare. The performances are over the top and almost as unbelievable as the special effects. In the end, they roll out the old cliché of having a stuborn mayor refusing to cancel the annual town festival/fete/event/gathering, and suffering for it. Inevitably, TORNADO WARNING is a waste of time, a play-it-safe and completely forgettable TV movie of the week.
TORNADO WARNING might as well have been called 'Storm Chasers the Movie', because that's exactly what this is: a film that follows the adventures of various rival storm chasing groups as they attempt to tackle the big one. The running time is mixed between lame scenes of actors overacting and really low budget storm set-pieces. Needless to say, rubbishy-looking CGI is the order of the day here.
The cast is headed by various ageing actresses who once had fame in the likes of KNOT'S LANDING before being reduced to this level of fare. The performances are over the top and almost as unbelievable as the special effects. In the end, they roll out the old cliché of having a stuborn mayor refusing to cancel the annual town festival/fete/event/gathering, and suffering for it. Inevitably, TORNADO WARNING is a waste of time, a play-it-safe and completely forgettable TV movie of the week.
¿Sabías que...?
- Curiosidades"Smoke'n Bob's" Hot Dog cart, seen in one of the town scenes, is a dead giveaway for the Winnipeg shooting location. Also recognizable: the Garry Theatre.
- PifiasThe notion of opening windows when a tornado approaches went out with the Eighties. There is no way a tornado expert like Dr. Arledge would be advising to do such a thing in 2002.
- ConexionesReferences Atomic Twister (2002)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was Tornado Warning (2002) officially released in Canada in English?
Responde