Durante la Guerra de Bosnia, dos soldados de bandos opuestos se ven atrapados en tierra de nadie. Un sargento de los Cascos Azules se dispone a ayudarlos, contraviniendo órdenes.Durante la Guerra de Bosnia, dos soldados de bandos opuestos se ven atrapados en tierra de nadie. Un sargento de los Cascos Azules se dispone a ayudarlos, contraviniendo órdenes.Durante la Guerra de Bosnia, dos soldados de bandos opuestos se ven atrapados en tierra de nadie. Un sargento de los Cascos Azules se dispone a ayudarlos, contraviniendo órdenes.
- Ganó 1 premio Óscar
- 30 premios y 25 nominaciones en total
Reseñas destacadas
Title (Brazil): `Terra de Ninguém' (`No Man's Land')
This is such a sad story with plenty of extremely touching scenes. It provokes people to think that there are so many ridiculous things that people do to each other during wars. People think that by killing each other the problem can be solved. This is a highly upsetting idea. It also revealed the terrible bureaucracy of some organisations, which gives little regard for human life.
Although it portrayed that the two rival soldiers had a lot of anger and distrust between them, there are times that it showed that they are also human. The two of them talked and found out that there was a girl that they both knew. I think that they were living in the same country, and they were just like any other civilians, just like you and me. They could have been living the same type of life, and suddenly friends became enemies.
In this film there were no large scale battle scenes like in `Saving Private Ryan' or `Gallipoli'. However, this film is just as sad and emotionally provoking like any other outstanding anti-war movie. It tells people the absurdity of war, and how crazy people can be during war. I was very shocked to know that the soldiers in Yugoslavia really put landmines beneath bodies, so that when the bodies are cleared away, the landmine would explode and kill the dead man's friends and relatives. This behaviour is extremely sickening. The inventor of such landmines is also very disgusting. I wonder, how can people create such a sophisticated device, and use it in such a ruthless way to kill? I have always thought that, if these people who invent killing machines go to invent some other machines instead, maybe we would be living in the `future world' portrayed in the film already. Our technology would be more advanced than it is now.
However, nowadays the weapons are getting more complicated, advanced, deadly and destructive every day. It saddens me a lot, because I never understood why a war has to start. The most ironic thing is that, the man who decides to wage a war against another country is always unharmed, because he sits in his office and has a large team of army to protect him. He does not die in the war. But because of his decision, millions of young men have to die.
Though there is such a grave message behind this film, there is also a lighter side to it. There were a lot of scenes which are funny, and all the viewers laughed and clapped for the witty statements. For example, when the two soldiers were trapped in the trench, they were discussing which side did more war crimes. The soldier who got the gun won the argument, and the possession of the gun changed a few times. There was another scene which a soldier searched the pockets of a soldier whom he just killed, and found a picture of a naked man.
Another scene which everyone laughed was that, a soldier asked the soldier lying on the landmine if he was OK. The poor soldier replied 'Of course I am OK, I got shot, and then I was unconscious, and then woke up and found there is a landmine beneath me, and then the whole world is watching me, and then I want to go to toilet, and now I was greeted by rubbish statements from my friend'.
I hope this film would make people understand that wars are completely vile and barbaric, and no one would start a war again.
The director Danis Tanovic himself says that it´s of course about just this war but it´s not like if you see this film in ten years you wont understand it.During their time on no man´s land they are civil to each other but the conflict continues and in the end that´s what is most important.The final scene of the film is superb.
A film that will go to film history.Worth to see by everyone.5/5
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesDanis Tanovic's directorial film debut.
- PifiasAfter Ciki shoots Nino and the old soldier, he loads the other of the together taped magazines in the rifle and makes a loading movement, thus cycling the first round in the chamber. A bit later, in the "who started the war scene" in the bunker, Ciki shouts "who started the war?" and makes another loading movement, which would cause the first round to be ejected (unspent) from the rifle. Yet no round is ejected.
- Citas
Sgt. Marchand: Vous parlez francais?
Serb private: No.
Sgt. Marchand: Do you speak English?
Serb private: Yes.
Sgt. Marchand: We came for people.
Serb private: Yes.
Sgt. Marchand: People between lines.
Serb private: Yes, yes.
Sgt. Marchand: Where are they?
Serb private: Yes, yes, yes.
Sgt. Marchand: Ok, you don't understand a word of what I'm saying, right?
Serb private: Yes.
- Banda sonoraNjemo Kolo
by Mirsad Tukic
Selecciones populares
- How long is No Man's Land?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idiomas
- Títulos en diferentes países
- No Man's Land
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 2.000.000 € (estimación)
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 1.012.153 US$
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- 22.645 US$
- 9 dic 2001
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 4.858.869 US$
- Duración
- 1h 38min(98 min)
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1