Newark Athlete

according to the edison motion pictures site this was an experimental picture to test new equipment and new techniques more than anything else.

the film is a small fragment of a boy swinging his clubs. part 1 is the original and part 2 is the looped version. all this will make a bit more sense when you see fragment 2 where all the material was composed together by gordon hendricks.

the film looks scary like eraserhead, only missing the noise typical for lynch :) not as interesting as some of the other early heise/dickson works, but worth seeing.

This ultra-short feature is one of a small number of surviving experiments made by the Edison Company in the same year as the well-known "Dickson Greeting" film. As such, it is simple but successful, accomplishing its goal of capturing the motions of its subject while also providing a clear image of him.

The footage simply shows one athlete or gymnast who makes a movement with a pair of clubs. The movie succeeds in photographing the subject in some detail, and in capturing the motion smoothly. The motion is equally clear at each of the speeds in the preserved footage. These are simple goals, to be sure, but they are basic foundations of cinema, and they had to be met before the new invention could be used for more complex and interesting movies.

In 1894, when the Edison Company was expanding its film production for commercial use in their Kinetoscopes, a similar camera test was done with the newer equipment then in use. That film, "Athlete With Wand", served a similar purpose, and it is of interest in comparison with this one.

In compare with other Edison (Dickson) installaments, this footage for me is poorest (eventually better than Monkeyshines). Quality is bad and in comparison with Men's Boxing it doesn't show any progress, quite to the contrary. Good things that film brings to me is increasing of my general knowledge. Until now I have no idea what Indian clubs are and what is their purpose. Second thing about that movie is that this movie was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant". It is currently the oldest film chosen to be in this Registry.

Made in May or June, 1891, this is an experimental film shot by William Kennedy Laurie Dickson and William Heise at Edison's Black Maria studios. Edison had just shown the 'Dickson Greeting' film to the ladies of the National Federation of Women's Clubs. For Dickson and Heise, it was back to the lab to continue working on films, and to get some of them eventually fit for public viewing.

What remains of this film today is in fairly poor shape and the action appears to be cut-off. It might have just been a test of what different types of motion looked like when shot by their Kinetograph camera and viewed through the Kinetoscope peephole viewer. As such, it was likely one of many experimental films which were important to gradually get a sense of what types of motions are interesting to watch on film.

With "Newark Athlete" of 1891, the experimentation with the Kinetograph improves. Having already come to the success of good picture quality with "Dickson Greeting" and the Duncan trilogy the same year, Edison was now finally able to test motion abilities. In the previously mentioned "Dickson Greeting" the movement made by the hat which motion pictures pioneer William Kennedy Dickson passes from one hand to the next is slow and smoothly done; here, a different type of motion is tested. The movement of the Indian clubs that the young athlete swings is quick-moving and different from that of the previous test, and, like before, it is successful in achieving its goal.

Oddly enough, it is not known who the athlete of the title is. Even without his name, I find it already pretty strange that Edison would go to the trouble of hiring a athlete from Newark (if that's really were he came from) to come down and perform the camera test. He could just as easily have gotten one of his factory workers to mimic the role (as he did with "Men Boxing") but no. Additionally, like the other camera tests from 1890-1891, it's possible none of them originally had titles and were merely given labels for the sake of the Kino DVD set (hence the '[' at the beginning and end of the titles on the menus). How then were they able to identify this young man as being from Newark?

Lastly, I would like to point one more thing out. The Edison set disk has a different camera test from the ones available online. The test available on disk is very short, damaged and only shows a very small movement from the athlete. The library of congress film available online is a different story and features an entire swing from the clubs (and also has darker lighting than the other). I guess it is possible two tests of the same subject were taken, thus creating two different film fragments to be projected.