PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
5,1/10
993
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Un Boeing 747, en ruta de Sidney a Los Ángeles, recibe la noticia de que una bomba a bordo puede explotar en el plazo de 1 hora. El piloto, recibe la noticia cuando está entre Hawaii y Los A... Leer todoUn Boeing 747, en ruta de Sidney a Los Ángeles, recibe la noticia de que una bomba a bordo puede explotar en el plazo de 1 hora. El piloto, recibe la noticia cuando está entre Hawaii y Los Angeles, a 2 horas del aeropuerto más cercano.Un Boeing 747, en ruta de Sidney a Los Ángeles, recibe la noticia de que una bomba a bordo puede explotar en el plazo de 1 hora. El piloto, recibe la noticia cuando está entre Hawaii y Los Angeles, a 2 horas del aeropuerto más cercano.
James Sikking
- George Eller
- (as James B. Sikking)
Laurie Foell
- Flight Attendant Maggie
- (as Laurie Foel)
Reseñas destacadas
This is a great show. They put suspense into saving, not the world, but a single 747. And it's no secret agent doing it. It's just a regular pilot. And his co-pilot. Original plot about a psycho out for revenge. He bombs a plane, and while they have to disarm it, the FBI's gotta catch him in order to find out how to disarm the bomb. When he dies, the greatest (and almost only) hope for the plane explodes itself. What's kind of stupid is the moment they think they've disarmed the bomb- almost the very second- they learn there's a back-up trigger. But it's still a lot of suspense for 1 plane. I'm impressed with TBS.
A pretty standard airline suspense story about a bomb planted on a 747 on a flight from Sydney, Australia to Los Angeles. There's some decent suspense, but the whole thing is pretty cliché (time clock clicking down to the last few seconds, the usual brief shots of faces taut with the strain, etc.), and the performances are average at best.
What really bugged me in this movie was why the writers felt the need to have an FBI agent conveniently present in Sydney when the threat was phoned in, and not only present but becoming front and centre in the search for the bomber. Maybe I'm being too sensitive here, but I rather suspect that the Australian police wouldn't need the FBI's help in what seemed to be a pretty routine piece of policework. That just made the whole thing too American-centred (with no discernible reason or need for it) for my liking.
Overall, though, it's an average to decent movie. 5/10.
What really bugged me in this movie was why the writers felt the need to have an FBI agent conveniently present in Sydney when the threat was phoned in, and not only present but becoming front and centre in the search for the bomber. Maybe I'm being too sensitive here, but I rather suspect that the Australian police wouldn't need the FBI's help in what seemed to be a pretty routine piece of policework. That just made the whole thing too American-centred (with no discernible reason or need for it) for my liking.
Overall, though, it's an average to decent movie. 5/10.
Ok it's a TV movie and yeah it's done on a budget especially as they have used stock clips from better plane disaster movies.
First of all no way the security would have allowed that ornament on the plane with all that wiring in the case so already the B. S meter is alive and kicking.
Acting is rather wooden with some of the characters and in truth it's a case of nobody cares with regards to each character as zero character development.
I was wishing the whole plane would crash killing them all as they were all stupid and as interesting as paint drying on the wall.
The would be nerve gas terrorist was just so dull it made me switch off constantly.
Is this worth your watch?
No is the answer and how people gave this high numbers of rating beggars belief but trust me when I tell you this * Films Sucks Goats Balls*
First of all no way the security would have allowed that ornament on the plane with all that wiring in the case so already the B. S meter is alive and kicking.
Acting is rather wooden with some of the characters and in truth it's a case of nobody cares with regards to each character as zero character development.
I was wishing the whole plane would crash killing them all as they were all stupid and as interesting as paint drying on the wall.
The would be nerve gas terrorist was just so dull it made me switch off constantly.
Is this worth your watch?
No is the answer and how people gave this high numbers of rating beggars belief but trust me when I tell you this * Films Sucks Goats Balls*
Nowhere to Land is a fair film! It stars Ernie Hudson, Jack Wagner, Christine Elise, James Sikking, Mark Lee, Rachael Blake, Helen Thomson, Damian Pike, and Laurie Foel. The acting by all of these actors is very good. Hudson is really great in this film! The action is good. The music is good. The film is quite exciting and the movie keeps you going until the finale. This is a very good and thrilling film. Just ignore the bad comments and give this film a try! If you Ernie Hudson, Jack Wagner, Christine Elise, James Sikking, and the rest of the cast I've mentioned above, thrillers, air plane disaster films, and exciting non-stop action films then I recommend this film!
This happened to be on, and I wasn't really doing anything else at the time. It's a made-for-TV thriller about tension on an airborne plane. Those tend to be pretty formulaic, and this is certainly no exception. It's average as they come, if it'll basically get the job done. The developments are all entirely predictable(care to take a guess if anyone panics?), and some of the dialog is really poor. With two exceptions, the cast is all nobodies, and it shows; the acting varies greatly, and there are definitely cases of scenery-chewing. None of the characters are memorable. The development of them is decent. Anyway, Jack Wagner takes a break from appearing in the fantasies of female Melrose Place viewers and returns to the small screen, and he's enjoyable enough to watch. Ernie Hudson brings some of his coolness to this, but as you may already know, his presence does not on its own a good flick make. The suspense and such are fine, if you just remember to pretend you don't know exactly where things are going. Honestly, you don't need to have seen any of these to be able to tell, the clichés are known by most. The way it's shot and edited is OK. I recommend this to fans of this kind of movie. 5/10
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesAll external airplane shots are taken from Decisión crítica (1996), so the fictitious airline had to have the same name as in that movie, "Oceanic".
- PifiasWhile the rest of the aircraft interior set looks authentic, the cockpit is amateurish. The bars between the panes of glass on the windscreen are from domestic windows and the instrumentation is unrealistic.
- ConexionesEdited from Decisión crítica (1996)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Nowhere to Land
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresa productora
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta