Añade un argumento en tu idiomaA naive young girl goes to a model agency, where she is molested, shot up with drugs and forced to become a prostitute.A naive young girl goes to a model agency, where she is molested, shot up with drugs and forced to become a prostitute.A naive young girl goes to a model agency, where she is molested, shot up with drugs and forced to become a prostitute.
Reseñas destacadas
The people who made this film must have literally been crazy. It stars Misty Ayres, who repeatedly strips down to her bra and panties, but her body is nothing to write home about. As the drunken sailor once shouted, "Leave it on!"
Then there is the absurd music they have playing throughout the movie. It is in no way connected to the action and is awful in the extreme. Then there's the dubbing. I thought I had seen bad dubbing but this is totally on another level. Either someone's back is to the camera or there is some vague mouth movement and a voice is heard. I don't know what the filmmaker was doing. I guess he filmed a bunch of random scenes without sound and then added the dialogue and the narration afterwards. Why would he do that?
The movie is only 58 minutes long but you will not make it that long. I turned it off after about ten minutes.
I know, some of you may be curious about the film as it seems to contains salacious material but don't be fooled. It is not so much the protagonist who is debauched as you the viewer. After seeing this film you will never be the same.
Fortunately it is currently available on Tubi and Youtube so at least you can see it for free. Don't pay even one red cent for this garbage. If you haven't seen this movie you don't know. There has never been anything this bad. Someone ought to start up a support group for people who have seen this film.
Then there is the absurd music they have playing throughout the movie. It is in no way connected to the action and is awful in the extreme. Then there's the dubbing. I thought I had seen bad dubbing but this is totally on another level. Either someone's back is to the camera or there is some vague mouth movement and a voice is heard. I don't know what the filmmaker was doing. I guess he filmed a bunch of random scenes without sound and then added the dialogue and the narration afterwards. Why would he do that?
The movie is only 58 minutes long but you will not make it that long. I turned it off after about ten minutes.
I know, some of you may be curious about the film as it seems to contains salacious material but don't be fooled. It is not so much the protagonist who is debauched as you the viewer. After seeing this film you will never be the same.
Fortunately it is currently available on Tubi and Youtube so at least you can see it for free. Don't pay even one red cent for this garbage. If you haven't seen this movie you don't know. There has never been anything this bad. Someone ought to start up a support group for people who have seen this film.
Cheap, amateurish, unimaginative, exploitative... but don't think it'll have redeeming amusement value. About as unentertaining, uninstructive and just plain dull as a film can be.
First of all, the 1965 date is certainly wrong for this film--1955 is more like it. The title card seems to be taken from a 1960s Doris Wishman film of the same title, but then the rest of the credits are original (was this film issued under another name in the 50s???). Director Sid Melton is best known as a fine comic character actor, famous from his stints on Make Room for Daddy and Captain Midnight, and from his many supporting roles in Lippert films in the 49-52 period, and his starring turn in the fascinating STOP THE CAB from the same period, where he was teamed with the amazing Iris Adrian. I'm surprised he put his name on this film, but it is relatively tame and probably couldn't have hurt his reputation THAT much as it merely features the beautiful Misty Ayres slowly stripping down to her undies a few times. As there are TWO scenes of that in the first ten minutes, I was expecting most of the film would be in that vein (which I could have enjoyed, but that's another story...), but it then evolves into an attempt at a crime drama, with a few comic bits (an ongoing drunk routine, done by a woman who is a moll of the gangster in charge..and another one with a singing telegram delivery boy played by Sid Melton's voice!). Basically, Ayres arrives in the big city, tries to get a job, works as a waitress, is approached by a sleaze who runs a modeling agency, goes out on a job that is actually a front for prostitution, gets beaten up and put on dope... I won't give anything else away. The films plays on the same level as, say, Broadway Jungle, and its main impediment to being accepted by most viewers is that it is shot silent and has non-synced dialog and sound effects. The acting of the bad guys is also on a dinner theatre melodrama level and isn't helped by the flat non-synced dubbing. Films like this have a strange fascination for me, and no doubt there is an interesting story behind this film and Mr. Melton's involvement in it. If you already own Dance Hall Racket, Broadway Jungle, Barry Mahon's "crime-oriented" nudies, Virgin in Hollywood, and other films of that ilk, you should surely appreciate this unique film experience as much as I did. If you don't know what any of those films are, I wouldn't think this would have any appeal for you. Sid Melton fans might also want to check it out, if only to see another facet to this great funnyman.
Released in 1965, but clearly shot years earlier, this is an inept little crime melodrama with some inept sexploitation up front. As usual for grindhouse flicks of era, there's a fair amount of undressing and dressing for no reason complemented by lousy music, annoying narration, and awkward editing. The coffee shop scene lays the excruciating groundwork, as we chop back and forth between characters to avoid actually seeing them speak their lines. All we get are reaction shots to the off-screen character's voice! 50s-pretty Misty Ayers strips to her French-cut panties a couple of times before the action gets started. She's accompanied continuously by what is apparently stock music from romantic to western to mother-does-the-dishes, mixed randomly to produce, among other things, the most thrilling cigarette lighting ever captured on film. Watch as he taps it! Watch as he strikes the match! Will he inhale or will he be captured by Apaches? Only time will tell!! The film tells the sordid tale of how Sally gets tricked into working in a whorehouse, falls for a dope, and can't escape. For some reason, we're treated to some of the most bored and boring hookers ever committed to film, literally doing their nails or knitting rather than entertaining the clientèle. Some stupendously lame comedy (boozy dame accidentally drinks milk! Har dee har!) and silent film acting doesn't help. This is one of the worst feature films I've ever seen, even on the Something Weird Video marquee. It's really more of a film curiosity for those interested in the history of cinema--very bad cinema.
Obviously made to show famous 1950s stripper Misty Ayers "acting" talents. Too bad she can't act.
Boring little tale about sweet, innocent Sally Down (Ayers) being drugged and forced into white slavery (prostitution). Then she meets likable Tommy Cole who instantly falls in love with her. He wants to help her escape but can he? You really won't care.
There's no real skin here--Ayers just strips down SLOWLY to her underwear (twice). The rest is just a boring little tale chockful of bad acting, atrocious "comedy" (never thought prostitution was funny but what do I know?) and terrible post-dubbed dialogue. I admit there was a twist at the end I didn't see coming but that's not enough to sit through this. Also Ayers' attempts at acting are hysterical! A real bomb. Avoid.
Boring little tale about sweet, innocent Sally Down (Ayers) being drugged and forced into white slavery (prostitution). Then she meets likable Tommy Cole who instantly falls in love with her. He wants to help her escape but can he? You really won't care.
There's no real skin here--Ayers just strips down SLOWLY to her underwear (twice). The rest is just a boring little tale chockful of bad acting, atrocious "comedy" (never thought prostitution was funny but what do I know?) and terrible post-dubbed dialogue. I admit there was a twist at the end I didn't see coming but that's not enough to sit through this. Also Ayers' attempts at acting are hysterical! A real bomb. Avoid.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesFilmed in 1954, not released until 1965.
- ConexionesFeatured in Film House Fever (1986)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Duración59 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was Bad Girls Do Cry (1965) officially released in Canada in English?
Responde