PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
4,3/10
3,1 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Añade un argumento en tu idiomaA man travels to an island with his girlfriend in search of his relatives, but he finds maybe more than what he wanted to know.A man travels to an island with his girlfriend in search of his relatives, but he finds maybe more than what he wanted to know.A man travels to an island with his girlfriend in search of his relatives, but he finds maybe more than what he wanted to know.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Carmen Ferland
- Mrs. Shea
- (as Carmen Ferlan)
Lisa Bronwyn Moore
- Toot
- (as Lisa Bronwyn-Moore)
Reseñas destacadas
Now, it isn't for everybody mind you, not even every die hard horror fans; but if you like freaky monsters under the ground from origins to awful to speak aloud, then not only are you a Lovecraft fan (see Shadow Over Innsmouth), but you'll probably enjoy this movie. Not fully incorporating the Cthulhu Mythos, huge parallels are seen in the backwoods MA people, the fish like monsters and something that came from a long time ago. Surprisingly, unlike the vicious scheiBfare Lovecraft renditions that came out of the eighties, this is surprisingly well done. It has actors and actresses that don't foul up the Lovecraftian nightmare that the director has in store for the audience, and a good plot. My only question was, so what happens next.
This is an average horror flick that really should be better than it is. The initial screenplay adapts Lovecraft's "The Lurking Fear" and was by Dan O'Bannon and Ronald Shusett. The film sports a beautiful location (Grand Manan Island, Canada) that maintains that same creepy boating town vibe as their earlier DEAD & BURIED, but gets bogged thanks to flat direction from Peter Svatek. Dupuis, who also has the O'Bannon penned SCREAMERS on his resume (his mom must be proud), looks a tad out of place, more like a TWILIGHT reject with his pale skin, flowing hair and bad fashion sense. Hauer is decent in the film and actually survives. Oddly enough, half of the cast also popped up in THE SWEET HEREAFTER the same year. The film does earn points for having harm come to several children through out. Svatek must have some kind of fetish because he moved on to TV movies like BABY FOR SALE (2004) and STOLEN BABIES, STOLEN LIVES (2008).
I recently rented 'Hemoglobin' (also known as 'Bleeders') expecting the typical A-Pix film -- horrible acting, bad script and annoying children. So, when I got home and popped it in the VCR I was rather surprised to see an interesting not-so-horrorish film.
Sure, it still had the annoyingly fake children that A-Pix are known for, but in the end 'Hemoglobin' was rather interesting. The storyline was quite good -- a young man with blood problems and his wife visit the island on which he was born. This man searches the island to try to find out who his parents were and why he has his problems and ends up running into quite an interesting story. All while this is happening, townsfolk are disappearing or getting scared to death.
I think this film would probably be of interest to anyone who's a fan of the A-Pix style or people interested in the Suspense/Thriller genre. It's not the greatest film that your ever going to see, but it's something worth catching on late night television or if you have a dollar to spare.
Also, take note of one fact pointed out twice in the movie -- the main actress is pregnant. Can anyone smell a sequel?
Sure, it still had the annoyingly fake children that A-Pix are known for, but in the end 'Hemoglobin' was rather interesting. The storyline was quite good -- a young man with blood problems and his wife visit the island on which he was born. This man searches the island to try to find out who his parents were and why he has his problems and ends up running into quite an interesting story. All while this is happening, townsfolk are disappearing or getting scared to death.
I think this film would probably be of interest to anyone who's a fan of the A-Pix style or people interested in the Suspense/Thriller genre. It's not the greatest film that your ever going to see, but it's something worth catching on late night television or if you have a dollar to spare.
Also, take note of one fact pointed out twice in the movie -- the main actress is pregnant. Can anyone smell a sequel?
I caught this flick on TV as "The Descendant". It's so horrible it should be a prime candidate for the old "MST3K" show. The special effects (creatures) are a joke and the acting is pure B-movie. Somehow, though, I kept watching this debacle of film making (and I hardly think it was for the plot). I can't tell if it was the lighting or the morbid fascination in seeing where something so bad could go.
Make no mistake, it's a bad, bad movie. Even for a horror flick. But if you like watching cheesy films - for kicks - this one takes the cake.
One last note: Poor Rutger Hauer. How far from 'Blade Runner' have we lost ye.
Make no mistake, it's a bad, bad movie. Even for a horror flick. But if you like watching cheesy films - for kicks - this one takes the cake.
One last note: Poor Rutger Hauer. How far from 'Blade Runner' have we lost ye.
I wrestled with myself as I took this off the shelf. "Look! O'Bannon and Shusett co-wrote it! Y'know, 'Alien' and 'Dead And Buried'. And Rutger's in it!". I still knew in my heart it was gonna stink, but I rented it anyway. And much to my surprise, it was nowhere near as awful as I feared it was going to be. Okay, it has many faults, especially the two no-name Canadian leads, a hack director, and a predictable plot which offers absolutely nothing unexpected whatsoever (which is made even worse by a DVD slick which doesn't even attempt to keep anything to itself), but I found it quite watchable just the same. I'm a sucker for Lovecraftian movies, Rutger has little more than a cameo really, but he's pretty cool in it, and there are one or two effective scares and creepy touches. So the verdict is utter trash but fun. Goes well with beer!
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesA loose adaptation of the HP Lovecraft story "The Lurking Fear"
- PifiasIn the prologue, the "King of Holland" is mentioned in relation to the year 1652. Holland was part of the Dutch Republic from 1581 through 1795, and had no king.
- Citas
Dr. Marlowe: [speaking under his breath] John! Can you hear me? I know what's wrong with you. I know how you can survive.
John Strauss: [breathing heavily] What is it?
Dr. Marlowe: How badly... do you wanna live?
- Versiones alternativasThe version released under the title, BLEEDERS is missing approximately one minute from the love scene between Roy Dupuis and Kristin Lehman, basically cutting out all of the nudity. The version titled, HEMOGLOBIN is uncut.
- ConexionesReferenced in Un hombre lobo en el campus: Muffy the Werewolf Slayer (1999)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Bleeders?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Herencia de sangre
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 8.000.000 CAD (estimación)
- Duración1 hora 34 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.66 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta