PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
4,7/10
2,2 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Cuando la astrónoma Lily McKee descubre que, de un cometa que se aproxima a la Tierra, se han desgajado algunos asteroides gigantes que amenaza con colisionar con nuestro planeta, decide env... Leer todoCuando la astrónoma Lily McKee descubre que, de un cometa que se aproxima a la Tierra, se han desgajado algunos asteroides gigantes que amenaza con colisionar con nuestro planeta, decide enviar a su hijo pequeño con su abuelo a Dallas.Cuando la astrónoma Lily McKee descubre que, de un cometa que se aproxima a la Tierra, se han desgajado algunos asteroides gigantes que amenaza con colisionar con nuestro planeta, decide enviar a su hijo pequeño con su abuelo a Dallas.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Ganó 1 premio Primetime Emmy
- 1 premio y 6 nominaciones en total
Zach Charles
- Elliot McKee
- (as Zachary B. Charles)
Carlos Gómez
- Adam Marquez
- (as Carlos Gomez)
Frank McRae
- Lloyd Morgan
- (as Frank Mcrae)
Brian Hill
- Max
- (as Brian Alan Hill)
Reseñas destacadas
This film has gained a certain infamy for stupidity. It's discussed as a laughing stock for the complete mutilation of science and even basic logic.
It's not a matter of a low budget. It's not that we are just being picky and expect it to be "too" accurate. I can accept a certain level of inaccuracy. This film goes way beyond that level into the absurd. It has about the scientific realism of spilling a bucket of water and having all the houses on the block carried away in the resulting flood.
There's no defending or rationalizing this level of stupidity. Even the "human drama" elements were mediocre at best and downright simplistic and boring for most of the film. The last half of the film dragged.
There's no reason a film should be made this poorly just because it's made for TV. It's not poor by comparison to other flicks or big budget movies; it's just poor. Even the good performances of some of the actors couldn't save this one.
It's not a matter of a low budget. It's not that we are just being picky and expect it to be "too" accurate. I can accept a certain level of inaccuracy. This film goes way beyond that level into the absurd. It has about the scientific realism of spilling a bucket of water and having all the houses on the block carried away in the resulting flood.
There's no defending or rationalizing this level of stupidity. Even the "human drama" elements were mediocre at best and downright simplistic and boring for most of the film. The last half of the film dragged.
There's no reason a film should be made this poorly just because it's made for TV. It's not poor by comparison to other flicks or big budget movies; it's just poor. Even the good performances of some of the actors couldn't save this one.
Being an astrophysics major, the first hour of this movie made me want to throw-up over the inaccuracies. Every scene involving a telescope was inaccurate for any modern observatory. ( Telescopes have been guided by computers for some time now, especially at observatories that get funding as the one depicted.) It gets better after that. and if you don't know a lick of science then it wont bother you anyway. The plot is pretty cheesy at times. (I don't think the FEMA director would really jump onto a burning building.) But it is a good story about human drama. I think they did an o.k. job portraying how people would react in a situation like this.
Every big disaster movie released on the big screen always bring wanna be made-for- tv movies. This Movie is not even close to "Deep Impact" or "Armageddon" which both were very good films. Well some woman looking in a telescope discovers a big astroid that seems to be coming to the earth. It Hits right in Kansas city. I found myself rooting for the astroids.
Part one was on the Sci-Fi channel last night, and I hope they don't bother to show part 2. This movie is *so* bad, the only reason I watched it was to see how much worse it would get. I wasn't disappointed. Terrible script, mediocre acting, implausible story line, inaccurate physics, this one has it all. I don't usually trash movies so harshly, but this one deserves it.
I just saw this movie on video, i liked it, some poor acting in some scenes, but in all it was as good as "Armageddon", well Armageddon was more thrilling. vote it a 7.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesMichael Biehn accepted the role of the main character on the grounds that the character be more fleshed out. He assisted in creating his character as a consultant.
- PifiasThe observatory is shown with astronomers working at lighted desks within the dome building. In reality, the heat from their bodies and extraneous light would ruin the view through the telescope, so observatories are generally operated remotely and certainly with no lights on!
- Versiones alternativasThe Live Home Entertainment VHS/DVD versions of "Asteroid" deletes sixty minutes of footage shown on the TV version.
- ConexionesReferences Independence Day (1996)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 19.000.000 US$ (estimación)
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta