Trancers 5

Knowing that 'Trancers 4' and 'Trancers 5' were filmed back to back, and having found 'Jack of swords' extraordinarily lacking, I didn't have much hope for 'Sudden Deth.' Yet, amazingly, the filmmakers found a way to hobble this picture even further, as it begins with seven minutes of lazily narrated recap and exposition. This fifth entry has the same advantages as its immediate predecessor - but unfortunately, the same flaws, too. This is so direly uninteresting.

With the productions linked, everything that could be said about 'Trancers 4' applies equally to 'Trancers 5.' I like the music composed by Gary Fry, yet it can only do so much by itself. It's no small get to have Peter David onboard as screenwriter, but one gets the sense that he wrote the best story he could while still being desperately hampered by the scenario, and constrained by demands for tawdry rewrites. The filming locations, set design and decoration, costume design, props, and even makeup and hair all look swell - yet these are unquestionably the best parts of the film, and that in itself is a problem.

Worst of all, however, is the pervasive feeling that the entirety of the feature was subject to Deth's characteristic "long second" device, or that the movie is a flailing attempt at self-parody. Dialogue, action, and even the most cursory physical movement crawls along with the most listless, idle, slothful torpor. The delivery of would-be jokes falls flat, and supposed action sequences are more dull than a spoon. I once again had to check that my video settings weren't altered to reduce playback speed, but even within the same feature we're treated to rare, fleeting instances of normal, realistic movement that informs without a doubt the stagnant gait of the craft is totally deliberate. It's impossible to tell from 'Sudden Deth' alone if anyone in the cast possesses any acting skills, as everyone is forced into the most slacking, apathetic, and downright sleepy of performances. I wouldn't mind seeing these actors in other films, so I suppose there's that - but here they, like all resources of the film, just go to waste.

'Trancers 5' is ostensibly a sci-fi adventure film with elements of comedy and horror, but all these aspects are rendered almost wholly inert by the consciously plodding pace. The fourth and fifth entries in the series bear zero thrills and a single laugh between the two of them - and it's not in this one.

I'm simply flabbergasted. There were a few actual good story ideas within. Yet it's as though the filmmakers set out with the earnest intent to weaken the movie with utmost disadvantage. A job well done, I suppose - mission accomplished. But to what end?

There's no reason to watch 'Trancers 5' if you didn't already suffer through 'Trancers 4' - and there's no particularly good reason to watch that, either. I can't recommend this even to viewers who can't get enough of B-movies; only someone who has already committed to watching the whole 'Trancers' series could claim any rationale for sitting through it. This is a slog, and purposefully so, and with that design all meaningful entertainment is forfeited. 'Sudden Deth' is an emphatically bad movie.

Seeing that "Trancers 5: Sudden Deth" is a direct continuation of "Trancers 4: Jack of Swords" and thus carrying on in the medieval setting, I have to say that the movie wasn't off to a great start for me. I preferred the three first movies more than the fourth, so this fifth movie is most likely not going to impress me.

And that is odd, because I do enjoy medieval fantasy more than sci-fi, usually. But the medieval fantasy setting just didn't do it for me in the fourth movie.

Well, I will say that the storyline in this fifth movie was better than the previous movie. And I suppose that because Charles Band returned to the writing tasks. Writers Charles Band, Danny Bilson, Peter David and Paul De Meo put together a fair enough script. But I have to admit that the fantasy setting for the "Trancers" movie just still didn't win me over.

The acting performances in the movie were fair. And something that spoke well in favor of the movie was the fact that cast members from the previous movie returned to reprise their characters in this fifth movie, so that gave something in sense of continuity.

Visually then "Trancers 5: Sudden Deth" was okay. The effects were fair.

Watchable for what it was, but "Trancers 5: Sudden Deth" was hardly an outstanding movie in the franchise. They sort of derailed the franchise after the third movie.

My rating of director David Nutter's 1994 movie "Trancers 5: Sudden Deth" lands on a four out of ten stars.

David Nutter directs this TV style fifth movie directly after his own fourth instalment. Seems Charles Band and Full Moon handed over the responsibility to a load of people unfamiliar with the series and told them to make a movie (well, two actually). Cast try their best, script is lifeless and the wooden, dull and additive Deth is here simply too drained to really work. Like the fourth movie this is a strange hybrid of Robin Hood (seems to be set in Sherwood Forest at times), Shakespeare plays and The Three Musketeers (though of course this is The One Musketeer!). This (and Trancers 4) were filmed at Charles Band's family castle in Romania and though an exceptionally striking place and one used to fabulous results in other films, here is is merely an option for cheapness. Unbelievably Trancers 6 (made several years later and virtually unrelated - something about a daughter) is even more obscure than the fourth and fifth instalments combined - and, Yes, they probably should be.

Jack Deth (Thomerson) returns to the Medieval alternate fantasy where Trancers are vampire like and joins force with The Vampire king's son and the Tunnel Rat rebels to save the world from Vampire Trancer rule. Trancers 5 is really, really pushing it in terms of nostalgia and fandom from the earlier movies. The film is aimless and has no real zip to make the story move forward. Action is mediocre per the budget and the only thing this tired sequel has going for it is Tim Thomerson. It's hard to believe that the director of this is currently one of the best directors on TV. I guess that's one good thing to come out of this misbegotten mediocrity. Also the same problem as 4 is that the sword and sorcery era is not nearly as interesting as the Blade Runner inspired first couple and the movie develops no real momentum. This is the type of movie that is best described as "For die hard fans only" which is something part 6 doesn't even get right.

* * out of 4(-Mediocre)

Our hero Jack Deth is still stuck in the other dimension playing dungeons and dragons, but this time he is trying to find a way home. throughout the movie he is on a quest to retrieve a jewel to help him get back home. This film plays better than the previous one because they do not have to set up the story of Jack going to the Dark Ages and fighting noble Trancers with swords and magic. This one was more of an adventure film because they are on a quest whereas the one before they are just trying to fight Trancers. This movie is bad, do not get confused with that, but it is more entertaining and the story did not drag as much. This is the last Jack Deth Trancers movie and instead of going away with a roar he goes away with a whimper. Do not even bother watching the 6th Trancers movie because Jack Deth isn't even in it. Indstead his daughter is hunting Trancers. That movie is awful to the point of unwatchable, but as least you can watch Trancers 5 and not feel so bad for yourself because it is just a little waste of your life, unlike the 6th one. Avoid this movie.

for more of my review visit my Youtube page: Logan Toxic and my blog logantoxic.blogspot