El vídeo de Benny

I found this movie to be very disturbing, though it is not a violent movie. Benny is a normal teenager, except for his rather horrid taste for gore and death. This is a very thought provoking movie stumbling through a couple of different immoral issues, the end of this movie was a bit different to what I was expecting and did sort of knock me off place. I give it an 8 out of 10.

From its opening sequence, the film immerses us in Benny's world, an adolescent who lives through the images he captures with his handycam and what he watches on television. These images, where reality, media, and fantasy blend without clear boundaries, shape his perception of the world: saturated with spectacles, chaotic, and lacking deep understanding.

The plot gradually reveals that this apparent visual chaos conceals something far darker and macabre. Benny receives an advanced video camera from his parents, a gift intended to compensate for the lack of affection in his upbringing. However, this present becomes a tool that allows him to emotionally isolate himself and create his own world through the lens, disconnecting even more from his family and social environment.

Haneke's cold, clinical style enhances this disconnection, with slow-paced direction that emphasizes unsettling details, like Benny's manipulation of recordings. This approach leads us to a profound examination of the influence of media on the perception of reality, the normalization of violence, and the emotional impact it has on the youth.

A key symbol in the narrative is the video of the pig's slaughter, recorded by Benny. This repeated act not only desensitizes him to violence but also reinforces the notion that, for him, reality turns into a spectacle that can be controlled, edited, and replayed at will.

The film raises essential questions about the boundaries between reality and fiction, the responsibility of parents in the emotional formation of their children, and how media and technology shape our behavior and perception of the world. Although the story was conceived in another era, it eerily anticipates our present, where life seems not to exist unless it's captured on camera or posted on social media.

Not as accomplished and tight as some of Hanekes other movies. Some episodes in the latter part of the movie could have been shortened (the vacation), and gives the movie overweight towards the end. A chilling first act, but the climax negates what has been happening all along. It raises important issues and is worth watching, nontheless.

It's all about shock value. Haneke's intro for this one is to desensitize you for the rest. What happened with the teenagers is nothing compared to what we see first because the first one is real (and we know it's real), what happened with the teenagers is fake and off-camera.

The discussion happens from this point. Why aren't we more shocked? Why is Benny so insensitive to what he did? It's because of his hobby. He doesn't see it as real, it's all from his camera point of view, like everything he saw before. It's just digital or analog information put on screen. He sees himself as a viewer and a camera at the same time. He is dehumanized, he is a machine, that gun was part of him as well. And like all Haneke, it's shocking.

Benny's Video is a slow methodical drama circling around the psyche of character decisions made through the movie. It has a strong start, and one that puts you into it right away with some disturbing footage. But then after 30 minutes or so it becomes a uneventful, both in events and character. Leading to a very slow end.

Directing is static, impactful and methodical. It's not afraid to sway from the norm, long takes that last forever. Enabling the viewer to be sucked in in certain moments. That is when it works, but there's also long lasting scenes on simply a TV. Now the I get it, the violence shown in the news and movie is supposed to be interesting and the 'story'' behind the actions. But it's dull and repeated too often. That said the directing in general managed to mostly keep me engaged and curious.

Sadly that curiosity is not rewarded. As a story it fits the notion of ''art house'' film, without a proper message to end with. But with a message as a whole. Perhaps back then it was more relevant, surely. But it makes for a weaker film now.

Acting is a standout, great work from all involved. Music, non existent. Sound design, maybe I'm weird but the eating and subtle sounds made this movie more uncomfortable than the disturbing stuff. Or maybe it was a mix of both. Just odd.

Decent but not as effective as I'd hoped.