Rayos X

The movie starts off with a young boy who obviously has a crush on this girl. When he sends her a valentine card, she laughs at it. This must have made the boy go psycho. Cut to the present. The girl is now a grown woman, who is going to get a routine check up at her hospital. The killer shows up at the hospital and begins to methodically slice and dice the hospital staff to get to the woman. This movie has some great suspense and atmosphere. The acting was a little below average, but the movie is too good to be missed.

Made by Canon around the time that Golan and Globus looked as though they might just be able to break into the big leagues, X-ray/ Hospital Massacre hits above expectations.

Intended and made as an American slasher to cash in on the video market of the time, this actually plays a lot like the Italian Gialli being produced around the same time, which I for one consider a great plus point!

The use of light and shadow to introduce interesting visuals and atmosphere to innocuous places such as staircases fits more with the low budget films of Italy rather than America, as does the use of a dissonant score that would almost act as a Greek chorus if either budget or imagination hadn't led to the repetition of a number of cues.

Although the kill rate is high enough to qualify as a slasher, each murder is directed towards an (admittedly crazy) goal, with nobody except the victim even believing that they are happening, which again I would say takes us closer to giallo territory than your standard slasher.

Add that to a motive of revenge for a childhood slight and a prioritization of feeling over logic in the action and you've got almost all the elements there.

Replace the latex gloves with black leather and it would only be the synchronization of the sound that differentiates it from a giallo of the same period, would recommend to anyone that has a fondness for Italian films of the period.

They could have left the killer out of the movie and it would have been just as good! It's so stupid that it's funny. Every scene is bizarre with the half wit doctors and staff. Thankfully none of these things could actually happen in a real hospital. I wasn't expecting much when I watched this and that's exactly what I got. Still, the craziness that occurs is worth a laugh. Watch this when you have nothing else to watch!

This film is one of the most underrated slasher films of the early 80's. It has okay camera work, good acting, fluid direction, recycled plot, etc. Barbi Benton plays Susan Jeremy. She enters a city hospital to get the results of a recent physical. From the moment she enters the hospital, she is approached by weird doctors, old and strange patients, and is forced to undergo one of the most exploitive examinations in movie history (THE DOCTOR TAKES HER BLOOD PRESSURE AFTER PLACING HER HAIR JUST SO YOU HAVE A GOOD LOOK AT BARBI'S NIPPLES). Soon you learn that there is a crazed killer after Susan and he's out for revenge. Though exploitive in some areas, the film has its fair share of good, solid film making. The script is pretty weak and so is the ending but the direction makes up for it. The camera work is okay but just not as fluid as HALLOWEEN II's (which has a similar plot). All in all > 7/10

Of all the slasher films that came out in 1981, this is definitely one of them. That said, for some small reason this film sticks out as a perfect example of the slasher film. With it's goofy plot revolving around the identity of the killer, and gratuitous Benton nudity, one really can't go wrong with this title. It's not a great film, but it's got all the key elements of the slasher film, and for that, at least it succeeds on those terms.