[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario de lanzamientosLas 250 mejores películasPelículas más popularesExplorar películas por géneroTaquilla superiorHorarios y ticketsNoticias sobre películasNoticias destacadas sobre películas de la India
    Qué hay en la TV y en streamingLas 250 mejores seriesProgramas de televisión más popularesExplorar series por géneroNoticias de TV
    ¿Qué verÚltimos tráileresOriginales de IMDbSelecciones de IMDbDestacado de IMDbGuía de entretenimiento familiarPodcasts de IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthPremios STARmeterCentral de premiosCentral de festivalesTodos los eventos
    Personas nacidas hoyCelebridades más popularesNoticias de famosos
    Centro de ayudaZona de colaboradoresEncuestas
Para profesionales de la industria
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de seguimiento
Iniciar sesión
  • Totalmente compatible
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente compatible
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar la aplicación
  • Reparto y equipo
  • Reseñas de usuarios
  • Curiosidades
  • Preguntas frecuentes
IMDbPro

Pelham 1, 2, 3

Título original: The Taking of Pelham One Two Three
  • 1974
  • 18
  • 1h 44min
PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
7,6/10
39 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Pelham 1, 2, 3 (1974)
In New York, armed men hijack a subway car and demand a ransom for the passengers. Even if it's paid, how could they get away?
Reproducir trailer2:27
1 vídeo
99+ imágenes
CaperDark ComedyActionCrimeThriller

En Nueva York, hombres armados secuestran un vagón del metro y exigen un rescate por los pasajeros. Incluso si se paga, ¿cómo podrían escapar?En Nueva York, hombres armados secuestran un vagón del metro y exigen un rescate por los pasajeros. Incluso si se paga, ¿cómo podrían escapar?En Nueva York, hombres armados secuestran un vagón del metro y exigen un rescate por los pasajeros. Incluso si se paga, ¿cómo podrían escapar?

  • Dirección
    • Joseph Sargent
  • Guión
    • John Godey
    • Peter Stone
  • Reparto principal
    • Walter Matthau
    • Robert Shaw
    • Martin Balsam
  • Ver la información de la producción en IMDbPro
  • PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
    7,6/10
    39 mil
    TU PUNTUACIÓN
    • Dirección
      • Joseph Sargent
    • Guión
      • John Godey
      • Peter Stone
    • Reparto principal
      • Walter Matthau
      • Robert Shaw
      • Martin Balsam
    • 253Reseñas de usuarios
    • 130Reseñas de críticos
    • 68Metapuntuación
  • Ver la información de la producción en IMDbPro
    • Nominado a 2 premios BAFTA
      • 3 nominaciones en total

    Vídeos1

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:27
    Official Trailer

    Imágenes116

    Ver cartel
    Ver cartel
    Ver cartel
    Ver cartel
    Ver cartel
    Ver cartel
    + 111
    Ver cartel

    Reparto principal77

    Editar
    Walter Matthau
    Walter Matthau
    • Lt. Garber
    Robert Shaw
    Robert Shaw
    • Blue
    Martin Balsam
    Martin Balsam
    • Green
    Hector Elizondo
    Hector Elizondo
    • Grey
    Earl Hindman
    Earl Hindman
    • Brown
    James Broderick
    James Broderick
    • Denny Doyle
    Dick O'Neill
    Dick O'Neill
    • Correll
    Lee Wallace
    Lee Wallace
    • The Mayor
    Tom Pedi
    Tom Pedi
    • Caz Dolowicz
    Beatrice Winde
    • Mrs. Jenkins
    Jerry Stiller
    Jerry Stiller
    • Lt. Rico Patrone
    Nathan George
    Nathan George
    • Ptl. James
    Rudy Bond
    Rudy Bond
    • Police Commissioner
    Kenneth McMillan
    Kenneth McMillan
    • Borough Commander
    • (as Kenneth Mc Millan)
    Doris Roberts
    Doris Roberts
    • Mayor's Wife
    Julius Harris
    Julius Harris
    • Inspector Daniels
    Cynthia Belgrave
    • The Maid
    Anna Berger
    Anna Berger
    • The Mother
    • Dirección
      • Joseph Sargent
    • Guión
      • John Godey
      • Peter Stone
    • Todo el reparto y equipo
    • Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro

    Reseñas de usuarios253

    7,639.1K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Reseñas destacadas

    9bkoganbing

    "Pelham 1-2-3 is in motion"

    One of my favorite films from the seventies is The Taking of Pelham One, Two Three because it's so New York. Of course the film was shot entirely on location in The Big Apple including the interiors which helped greatly. But more than that, the characters have all the New York flavor about them with one exception.

    The cat of course is led by Walter Matthau who plays a Transit Police Lieutenant. His character is a kind of combination of Archie Bunker and Detective Lennie Briscoe from Law and Order, in many ways not terribly admirable. He's also a transit cop and at that time the Transit Police were a separate entity. They were merged into the regular NYPD during the Giuliani administration.

    There's no real glory in the Transit Police, these guys were mostly charged with dealing with drunks and kids with loud boom boxes. If a homicide ever occurred the NYPD quickly took it over as they would in most situations. But this ongoing crisis on a train on the Lexington Avenue Local occurs on his watch and it's career make or break case that Matthau is very aware of. And he proves fully capable during the crisis.

    The crisis is four men, Robert Shaw, Earl Hindman, Hector Elizondo, and Martin Balsam mount a carefully planned assault on a subway train out of Pelham Bay station in the Bronx in mid-Manhattan and hold it and the passengers for ransom for a million dollars. The outsider to New York is Robert Shaw in one of his best roles, a former British army officer and mercenary. During the course of the robbery they kill a station supervisor played by roly poly Tom Pedi, one very quintessential New Yorker and their coldblooded villainy is established.

    In fact the whole cast is a microcosm of the ethnic strains of New York City which makes the film so enjoyable, especially to one who lived there, the first 49 years of his life. Even the mayor is portrayed as a weak, fumbling nonentity and back then our mayor was one Abraham D. Beame who was just that, probably one of the worst mayors the city ever had. Tony Roberts has a very good role as the tough as nails Deputy Mayor concerned about both his boss's political career and resolving the crisis.

    The Taking of Pelham One Two Three once the hijack is done is suspense filled and doesn't let up for a moment. I can't give the ending away, but the final shot of Walter Matthau's face as the end title music starts and the credits begin to roll is priceless.
    9ntvnyr30

    Another example of why the 70's was the finest decade for films.

    It is my belief that the finest era for films was the 1970's. Consider all the classics that were produced in that era (Godfather I and II, Patton, The Sting, Jaws, Mean Streets, The Exorcist, The French Connection, Star Wars etc). My belief was recently validated by Jodie Foster, who essentially said the same thing. One of the reasons why the films were great was that the directors were ostensibly in control of the films, rather than by a committee of the usual Hollywood "insiders" who think they know what people want to see, but rarely make the correct decisions.

    I know that this film was re-made( for TV)--God knows why--but I'm sure if they attempted another film version Matt Damon would be playing the grizzled transit police cop (Matthau's role) and Jude Law would be playing the Robert Shaw role. That's another reason why the original and other films of the 70's were so great: the casting was more believable. Today Hollywood is so incredibly youth-obsessed that actors are completely miscast.

    I am not stating that this is another 70's classic, but even this film is far superior to many of today's films. And yet, I'll bet you couldn't find "Pelham" in your local video store.

    I love several things about this film. The first thing to hit you is that wonderful, funky score that in some parts sounds like controlled chaos. I love the script, which is not completely dark despite the underlying theme, as there are some very funny moments throughout the film: for instance, the chagrined look on Matthau's face when he discovers the Japanese visitors can speak English.

    There are many examples of mistaken identity in this film: the supervisor who is gunned down is called "goombah", but he isn't Italian; Matthau thinks the black police captain is white over the radio; Matthau mistakes the long-haired undercover cop (who was shot on the train tracks) for a female. I also love the character who plays the mayor, who unbelievably bears a striking resemblance to Mayor Koch, who was elected 3 years later!!!! All in all a great action film, and one that will hold up for years.

    Addendum: Well, they're doing it--they're re-making this film because Hollywood is almost completely bereft of new ideas (see "Josie and the Pussycats" "Bewitched" the upcoming "I Dream of Jeannie"). I half-expect they will remake "The Paper Chase" next with P.Diddy as Professor Kingsfield.
    8Xstal

    The Best Laid Plans...

    A subway train is hijacked by armed gang, Mr. Blue's the boss, he has an English twang, there's also Grey and Brown and Green, in car one they all convene, uncoupling the rest, that leaves eighteen. A dialogue begins, with those up top, Lt. Garber is a New York transit cop, who's informed by Mr. Blue, of the ransom they pursue, one million dollars is the price for hostage swap.

    Still a wonderful piece of filmmaking, Robert Shaw perfectly cast as Mr. Blue, the exchanges between him and Walter Matthau as Garber outstanding, all encompassed in a more than believable story that travels without interruption, all the way to the end of the line.
    9greenforest56

    film student's action picture

    There are many disappointing action pictures out there – this is not one of them. The genius of the film is there is no wasted motion. The picture starts right with the plot – no introduction or character development. The characters are allowed to develop as the plot moves along.

    Which brings us to pacing – the pacing in this picture is excellent. It moves right along and never stops, never slows, never goes too fast. This is the strongest element of its success.

    Another strength is its economy of motion. Many action pictures bore us with unneeded car chase scenes, shoot-em-ups, explosions and other mayhems that are used as filler when true creativity comes up short. This film needs none of that. Only that which is necessary is shown. Only that which needs speaking is spoken. This film is deftly written and crafted with great economy and this underpins the excellent pacing. It moves right along because there is no wasted motion as there is in most other action pictures.

    This does not mean there is no action, there is fabulous action, but only such action as is necessary to move the plot along. There is no action simply to occupy time until the requisite 90 minutes are up.

    The directing is equally economical. No fancy shots, shaky cameras, or special effects – just good, straight forward directing.

    I doubt this picture could be made today for the above reasons. The script readers would reject it for 'lack of development'; 'not enough action'; 'no romantic interest'; and all the other brainless formulas script readers dole out. The producers would demand 'more action' and 'camera work' from the directors. And, of course, a romantic interest (in some state of undress) would have to be shoe horned in.

    Film students should study this picture. From it they will learn that brevity is a virtue and mindless formulas are just that - mindless.
    8GregCnAZ-1

    My favorite crime drama of the '70s. Maybe ever.

    With all the other plot summaries written here, I won't go into what this film is all about. I just want to say that I don't believe this genre has been done better, either before or since. I first saw "Pelham 1,2,3" when I was 14 at a drive-in theater in Northern CA. It holds a memorable place for me as the first R rated movie I ever saw, as well as the first time I ever heard the "F" word in a movie. But way beyond that, I was so completely sucked into the story even at my young age. Now all these years later, I still am. I own the movie and must see it periodically. I'm so glad, reading all the other user comments, to find that I'm just one of many who absolutely love this film. Walter Matthau, Robert Shaw, Martin Balsam, and the rest of the cast are all brilliant. The comedy in the film is also outstanding and never out of place within the storyline. It simply serves to make the film more realistic. And last but not least, David Shire's score is the coolest. I only wish they had put a soundtrack out for this film. When I watch this movie, the music must be cranked.

    Don't bother catching this film on TV. It's always completely hacked up. Rent it or buy the DVD. It will remind you just how much fun movies used to be.

    Más del estilo

    Un largo adiós
    7,5
    Un largo adiós
    Little Murders
    6,9
    Little Murders
    Asalto al tren Pelham 1 2 3
    6,4
    Asalto al tren Pelham 1 2 3
    En el calor de la noche
    7,9
    En el calor de la noche
    Ladrón
    7,4
    Ladrón
    Los tres días del cóndor
    7,4
    Los tres días del cóndor
    Pánico en la calle 110
    7,0
    Pánico en la calle 110
    Luna de papel
    8,1
    Luna de papel
    Pelham 1, 2, 3 (Secuestro en Nueva York)
    5,3
    Pelham 1, 2, 3 (Secuestro en Nueva York)
    La conversación
    7,7
    La conversación
    El último testigo
    7,1
    El último testigo
    Vivir y morir en Los Ángeles
    7,3
    Vivir y morir en Los Ángeles

    Argumento

    Editar

    ¿Sabías que...?

    Editar
    • Curiosidades
      In a TVO (Ontario, Canada) interview, the producer said that this film did terrific box office in New York, Toronto, London and Paris--all cities with subways--but was considered a flop in the rest of the world.
    • Pifias
      The relevant section of the Lexington Avenue Line includes curves sharp enough to have speed-controlled signals. As Mr. Green would have known, these cannot be cleared to green in advance of the train's arrival and will not clear if it is running away.
    • Citas

      Lt. Garber: [looking for the inspector] Inspector Daniels?

      Inspector Daniels: [identifying himself] Daniels.

      Lt. Garber: [realizing that Inspector Daniels is Black] Oh, I, uh, thought you were, uh, like a shorter guy or... I don't know what I thought.

    • Créditos adicionales
      Although many of the scenes in this film were taken on transit property, the New York City Transit Authority is not responsible for plot, story and characters portrayed. The Authority did not render technical advice and assistance.
    • Conexiones
      Edited into Superman III (1983)

    Selecciones populares

    Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
    Iniciar sesión

    Preguntas frecuentes22

    • How long is The Taking of Pelham One Two Three?Con tecnología de Alexa
    • Why are the passengers specifically designated in the credits but not in the movie itself?
    • What is 'The Taking of Pelham One Two Three' about?
    • Is "The Taking of Pelham" based on a book?

    Detalles

    Editar
    • Fecha de lanzamiento
      • 31 de marzo de 1975 (España)
    • País de origen
      • Estados Unidos
    • Idiomas
      • Inglés
      • Español
    • Títulos en diferentes países
      • Pelham un, dos, tres
    • Localizaciones del rodaje
      • Gracie Mansion, Manhattan, Nueva York, Nueva York, Estados Unidos(mayor's home - exteriors)
    • Empresas productoras
      • Palomar Pictures International
      • Palladium Productions
    • Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro

    Taquilla

    Editar
    • Presupuesto
      • 5.000.000 US$ (estimación)
    • Recaudación en todo el mundo
      • 357 US$
    Ver información detallada de taquilla en IMDbPro

    Especificaciones técnicas

    Editar
    • Duración
      1 hora 44 minutos
    • Color
      • Color
    • Mezcla de sonido
      • Mono
    • Relación de aspecto
      • 2.35 : 1

    Contribuir a esta página

    Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
    Pelham 1, 2, 3 (1974)
    Principal laguna de datos
    By what name was Pelham 1, 2, 3 (1974) officially released in India in Hindi?
    Responde
    • Más datos por cubrir
    • Más información acerca de cómo contribuir
    Editar página

    Más por descubrir

    Visto recientemente

    Habilita las cookies del navegador para usar esta función. Más información.
    Obtener la aplicación IMDb
    Inicia sesión para tener más accesoInicia sesión para tener más acceso
    Sigue a IMDb en las redes sociales
    Obtener la aplicación IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtener la aplicación IMDb
    • Ayuda
    • Índice del sitio
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Licencia de datos de IMDb
    • Sala de prensa
    • Anuncios
    • Empleos
    • Condiciones de uso
    • Política de privacidad
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una empresa de Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.