PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
7,3/10
4,5 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Un reportero persigue a un alquimista de 144 años que está matando a mujeres por su sangre.Un reportero persigue a un alquimista de 144 años que está matando a mujeres por su sangre.Un reportero persigue a un alquimista de 144 años que está matando a mujeres por su sangre.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Darren McGavin
- Carl Kolchak
- (as Darren Mc Gavin)
David Armstrong
- Police Officer
- (sin acreditar)
Margaret Bacon
- Reporter
- (sin acreditar)
Al Beaudine
- Reporter
- (sin acreditar)
Francoise Birnheim
- Restaurant Woman
- (sin acreditar)
John Blower
- Bar Patron
- (sin acreditar)
Loren Brown
- Bar Patron
- (sin acreditar)
Bill Clark
- Bar Patron
- (sin acreditar)
Reseñas destacadas
After an estimated 75,000,000 viewers tuned in to ABC-TV on Tuesday, January 11, 1972, television history was made. That night, one-third of America was transfixed to its TV sets as the tale of an intrepid, hard-nosed reporter named Carl Kolchak pursued an elusive modern-day vampire across Las Vegas before dispatching the bloodsucker with an inevitable stake-through-the-heart. At the time, THE NIGHT STALKER, an ABC Circle Film, became the most watched television program in the history of the medium, which enticed the ABC brass to quickly reassemble key players of the telefilm (actor Darren McGavin, producer Dan Curtis, and writer Richard Matheson) to lay plans for its sequel.
Thus, THE NIGHT STRANGLER hit the airwaves a year after its popular predecessor. The talented Darren McGavin reprises his role as Kolchak, the tenacious newsman in trademark straw porkpie hat and rumply seersucker suit, who arrives in Seattle, meets up with his cantankerous former editor Tony Vincenzo, and lands another unearthly assignment. This time around, the locum tenens of the vampire is an immortal alchemist named Dr. Richard Malcolm, an ex-Civil War physician who gains superhuman strength and avoids death by concocting an elixir of life, a substance whose main ingredient is human blood! Every 21 years since the end of the Civil War, Malcolm returns to the Seattle streets to procure blood from the bases of strangled women's skulls. But Kolchak manages to locate the undead medico's lair in Old Seattle's underground ruins and foils the creature's attempts at another 21 years of dormancy. Again, local authorities ice his chances at publishing his macabre story and the hapless reporter becomes footloose once more.
Like THE NIGHT STALKER, THE NIGHT STRANGLER is a bone-chilling tale that blends gritty detective drama with a touch of the supernatural. Fast-paced plot, nail-biting suspense, and above-average dialogue highlight this sequel, which rivals the original telefilm for originality and overall quality. Contrary to popular opinion, THE NIGHT STALKER and THE NIGHT STRANGLER are much better TV fare than any episode of the much-overrated Kolchak rip-off THE X-FILES, and these telefilms serve to remind viewers that TV has indeed produced some outstanding programs, programs which mark the halcyon days of the medium.
Thus, THE NIGHT STRANGLER hit the airwaves a year after its popular predecessor. The talented Darren McGavin reprises his role as Kolchak, the tenacious newsman in trademark straw porkpie hat and rumply seersucker suit, who arrives in Seattle, meets up with his cantankerous former editor Tony Vincenzo, and lands another unearthly assignment. This time around, the locum tenens of the vampire is an immortal alchemist named Dr. Richard Malcolm, an ex-Civil War physician who gains superhuman strength and avoids death by concocting an elixir of life, a substance whose main ingredient is human blood! Every 21 years since the end of the Civil War, Malcolm returns to the Seattle streets to procure blood from the bases of strangled women's skulls. But Kolchak manages to locate the undead medico's lair in Old Seattle's underground ruins and foils the creature's attempts at another 21 years of dormancy. Again, local authorities ice his chances at publishing his macabre story and the hapless reporter becomes footloose once more.
Like THE NIGHT STALKER, THE NIGHT STRANGLER is a bone-chilling tale that blends gritty detective drama with a touch of the supernatural. Fast-paced plot, nail-biting suspense, and above-average dialogue highlight this sequel, which rivals the original telefilm for originality and overall quality. Contrary to popular opinion, THE NIGHT STALKER and THE NIGHT STRANGLER are much better TV fare than any episode of the much-overrated Kolchak rip-off THE X-FILES, and these telefilms serve to remind viewers that TV has indeed produced some outstanding programs, programs which mark the halcyon days of the medium.
The Night Strangler is the follow up to the successful 1972 TV movie 'The Night Stalker'. Aside from featuring similar titles, the films also share similar plot lines, and it could be said that this is something of a remake of the first film with a slightly more in depth story. I won't profess to be a big fan of the first film in the series, although I found it to be a more than decent TV movie and I did enjoy it. This film isn't a big improvement over the first one, although I would say it's an improvement; with a longer running time and a more well thought-out plot, this one delves into it's subject matter more and feels more like a proper movie than a made for TV movie. Darren McGavin once again plays Kolchak; a maverick reporter who this time finds himself in Seattle after being ran out of Las Vegas (probably for annoying everyone with his constant persistence!). Coincidence strikes and pretty soon he's on the trail of yet another vampire! He discovers that every 21 years for over a hundred years, a group of people have been killed within a small time period and thinks the murders are connected.
The thing that stands out most about this film is most definitely the central performance from Darren McGavin. His portrayal of the stubborn reporter is great to watch and always ensures that the film is entertaining. A lot of the film consists of our unlikely hero trying to convince the relevant authorities that his suspicions are fact and them disbelieving them. These scenes are fairly clichéd, although they are fun to watch; and again it's mostly because of McGavin's excellent impersonation of the central character. Since the film is really about the detective on the trail of the vampire, there's not a great deal of actual bloodshed or bloodsucking in the film, although that isn't much of a hindrance because as a thriller it works very well and director Dan Curtis does manage to create several moments of suspense that kick the action up a level. It's always obvious where it's all going, and the ending doesn't come as a surprise; but it's a fun time getting there. This film and the first one were pilots for a TV series and obviously they did the trick because Kolchak was solving more mysteries in his own TV series a year after this film was released.
The thing that stands out most about this film is most definitely the central performance from Darren McGavin. His portrayal of the stubborn reporter is great to watch and always ensures that the film is entertaining. A lot of the film consists of our unlikely hero trying to convince the relevant authorities that his suspicions are fact and them disbelieving them. These scenes are fairly clichéd, although they are fun to watch; and again it's mostly because of McGavin's excellent impersonation of the central character. Since the film is really about the detective on the trail of the vampire, there's not a great deal of actual bloodshed or bloodsucking in the film, although that isn't much of a hindrance because as a thriller it works very well and director Dan Curtis does manage to create several moments of suspense that kick the action up a level. It's always obvious where it's all going, and the ending doesn't come as a surprise; but it's a fun time getting there. This film and the first one were pilots for a TV series and obviously they did the trick because Kolchak was solving more mysteries in his own TV series a year after this film was released.
Having seen this movie when it originally appeared on TV in the '70's, I can still remember the chills I got watching it. Seeing it again on video recently, those old chills returned and were just as enjoyable. Kolchak is one of my all-time favorite heroes, a bumbling regular guy who has enough faith in himself to follow his beliefs despite the road blocks thrown in his path by the authorities, who believe only they know the right way. The villain is not your run of the mill monster but as evil, lurking and despicable as the best of them. The premise of the movie that these things can and do exist unbeknownst to the gullible public is what makes this movie so much fun to watch. It makes you want to pull your covers up over your head on a dark stormy night just the way a great horror film should.
The follow-up story to The Night Stalker once again finds wisecracking reporter Karl Kolchak investigating a string of bizarre murders that yet again points to an unnatural suspect. Deftly crafted and making fab use of its added runtime, The Night Strangler is just as impressive as its predecessor and is a sequel done right, for it takes what was good about the first film and builds on top of it.
Directed by Dan Curtis, the story follows almost the same route as before and retains all the fascinating aspects of the original. Additional runtime allows for more of Kolchak's ranting & friction with the powers that be. The plot is simple in structure but executed with finesse and the improved production value is evident in its elaborate set pieces. The antagonist however is less memorable in this one.
Just like the previous entry, the film comes equipped with a spooky atmosphere for the night scenes and the camera is skilfully utilised to heighten the build-up. Darren McGavin reprises his role as Kolchak and is even more abrasive, intruding & exasperating than last time which only works in the story's favour. The finale is a tad too expository and is amongst the weaker aspects but it still wraps the journey of a fine note.
Overall, The Night Strangler is slightly more polished in looks, more focused in content & more confident in executing the original formula and also improves upon the original in few aspects. Despite lacking a fearsome villain, the film makes up for it by creating an aura about him. The ride is almost as entertaining & satisfying if not more, the interest in the outcome is never lost, and McGavin's grating act comfortably steers the film past the finish line. A worthy sequel.
Directed by Dan Curtis, the story follows almost the same route as before and retains all the fascinating aspects of the original. Additional runtime allows for more of Kolchak's ranting & friction with the powers that be. The plot is simple in structure but executed with finesse and the improved production value is evident in its elaborate set pieces. The antagonist however is less memorable in this one.
Just like the previous entry, the film comes equipped with a spooky atmosphere for the night scenes and the camera is skilfully utilised to heighten the build-up. Darren McGavin reprises his role as Kolchak and is even more abrasive, intruding & exasperating than last time which only works in the story's favour. The finale is a tad too expository and is amongst the weaker aspects but it still wraps the journey of a fine note.
Overall, The Night Strangler is slightly more polished in looks, more focused in content & more confident in executing the original formula and also improves upon the original in few aspects. Despite lacking a fearsome villain, the film makes up for it by creating an aura about him. The ride is almost as entertaining & satisfying if not more, the interest in the outcome is never lost, and McGavin's grating act comfortably steers the film past the finish line. A worthy sequel.
Relocated to Seattle, reporter Kolchak stumbles on yet another series of murders, a series which seems to be repeated every twenty-one years. Of the two movies, `The Night Strangler' has the slight edge. This is possibly down to its location, Seattle. Very unfamiliar to me, it adds certain freshness to the story, while the underground old' Seattle is a fantastic location, macabre and memorable; it sticks in my mind long after watching the movie. The candle lit, cob-webbed corpses are perhaps one of the most vivid images in American genre television.
Also of note is Richard Anderson's villain, a crazed, immortality seeking Doctor, he is far more impressive than the original's vampire. A more assured script (which is genuinely funny in places), plus some enjoyable cameo's (Carradine, Hamilton), help make this a rare sequel which is better than the original.
Sadly, plans for a third movie were abandoned and instead a short-lived, inferior television series (without Matheson's involvement) resulted. A patchy effort, despite McGavin's best efforts it never attained the quality of the two movies.
Also of note is Richard Anderson's villain, a crazed, immortality seeking Doctor, he is far more impressive than the original's vampire. A more assured script (which is genuinely funny in places), plus some enjoyable cameo's (Carradine, Hamilton), help make this a rare sequel which is better than the original.
Sadly, plans for a third movie were abandoned and instead a short-lived, inferior television series (without Matheson's involvement) resulted. A patchy effort, despite McGavin's best efforts it never attained the quality of the two movies.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesBeyond the 90-minute version, there was additional footage filmed featuring George Tobias as Jimmy "Stacks" Stackhaus, a reporter who had reported on the previous series of "Strangler" murders in the 1930s. In that footage, Kolchak tracks down the veteran reporter and speaks with him about the murders.
- PifiasThe "fog" in Dr. Malcolm's lair is clearly generated by a fog machine which is just out of sight at Kolchak's feet. The discharge can be seen flowing away from Kolchak quite rapidly as if pushed by a fan.
- Citas
[first lines]
Carl Kolchak: [voice over] This is the story behind the most incredible series of murders to ever occur in the city of Seattle, Washington. You never read about them in your local newspapers or heard about them on your local radio or television station. Why? Because the facts were watered down, torn apart, and reassembled... in a word, falsified.
- Versiones alternativasThere is a 90-minute version, which features additional footage with Al Lewis, Kate Murtagh, George DiCenzo, and Margaret Hamilton which was cut for the original TV release. This 90-minute version is the one typically released in syndication to fill the standard 2-hour movie slot.
- ConexionesFeatured in Svengoolie: The Night Strangler (1996)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- Where is this movie set?
- Where was the first movie set?
- Who is the first victim in the film?
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- The Night Strangler
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresa productora
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
- Duración1 hora 14 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.33 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was El estrangulador de la noche (1973) officially released in Canada in English?
Responde