Añade un argumento en tu idiomaA wealthy businessman whose wife has divorced him, is bitter about the divorce, and prevents his ex-wife from seeing their child. She takes him to court, and a judge tries to determine what ... Leer todoA wealthy businessman whose wife has divorced him, is bitter about the divorce, and prevents his ex-wife from seeing their child. She takes him to court, and a judge tries to determine what will be best for the child.A wealthy businessman whose wife has divorced him, is bitter about the divorce, and prevents his ex-wife from seeing their child. She takes him to court, and a judge tries to determine what will be best for the child.
- Dirección
- Guión
- Reparto principal
- Loud Member
- (sin acreditar)
- Mrs. Delaney
- (sin acreditar)
- Party Guest
- (sin acreditar)
- Minor Role
- (sin acreditar)
- Lab Assistant
- (sin acreditar)
- Bartender
- (sin acreditar)
- Roberts
- (sin acreditar)
- Bailiff
- (sin acreditar)
- Parking Attendant
- (sin acreditar)
- Passerby
- (sin acreditar)
Reseñas destacadas
Bing is doing a more serious role without any singing. He's still Bing, but the character's stubbornness gets rather awful. He has a seething anger just under the surface which blows up after the judgement. It's a very modern role and a very modern subject matter. The big climax seems to happen in the middle. The self-pitying Earl is not a fun watch. I don't care much about the new romance. After all, it is all about the boy. My mind keeps drifting to Kramer vs Kramer. In a way, this movie is not as good, but it also shows how forward thinking this is. I do have two issues. First, the judgement is rather short-sighted. She should order the boy to go for a summer vacation. This seems to be done for dramatic purposes. Second, the boy is way too stupid. I get that he needs to ask questions about King Solomon, but he sounds so stupid. It would work better if the kid is younger.
From all I've heard he was no great father either. A complete tyrant. His children must have watched this movie in awe, not even recognizing his behavior towards his son.
Crosby plays Earl Carleton, a successful businessman who has been divorced from his wife and has custody of their son Ted (Malcolm Brodrick). His wife (Fickett) left him for another man (Eastham) and Earl isn't about to forgive or forget. Angry and bitter, when she and her new husband want sole custody of Ted, Carleton fights them hard, at one point resorting to kidnapping.
Inger Stevens plays an associate in attorney E.G. Marshall's office, and she falls for Earle and wants to help him.
This film was meant to show up the problems of divorce, but mostly it demonstrates the need to move on, otherwise, your anger will devour you. It's the lesson Earle, who loves his son, has to learn, and do what's best for the boy.
"Man on Fire" was Inger Stevens' big break. A beautiful young woman, she apparently had a habit of falling for her leading men, and Crosby was no exception. She was devastated when he married Kathryn Crosby. She finally lost her life either to suicide or an overdose in 1970. Since she refused treatment for carbon monoxide poisoning on the set of "Cry Terror," saying she wanted to die, it doesn't appear that, with everything she had going for her, she was ever very happy. A real pity.
It was delightful to see soap opera star Mary Fickett in a non-soap role, and she was very effective.
Bing Crosby had an enormous effect on popular music and was one of the most popular actors in films for years and years. He was much more than a crooner. He plays the role of a difficult man very well.
The denouement was a little abrupt, but the film made its points.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesBing Crosby wanted to marry Inger Stevens after making this film, but she refused to convert to Catholicism.
- PifiasAt about the 24 minute mark, when Earl and Nina are sitting at the bar talking, Earl having ordered coffee and ginger ale for her, their beverages are suddenly there, along with cream and a sugar bowl, without any appearance of the bartender bringing them.
- Citas
Theodore 'Ted' Carleton: King Solomon who was going to cut the baby in half. Why did Solomon smile?
Earl Carleton: Because he knew who the real mother was.
Theodore 'Ted' Carleton: The one who gave up the baby.
Selecciones populares
- How long is Man on Fire?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 1.180.000 US$ (estimación)
- Duración1 hora 35 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.66 : 1