Kamennyy tsvetok

I saw The Stone Flower back in the forties shortly after it was released. I have never forgotten it. The color was so amazing that some of the images have remained permanently imprinted in my brain! I am disappointed that it is unavailable on video nor have I ever seen t revived anywhere where I have been. I am glad there are at least a few others who remember it.

An old man recounts a fairy-tale to a group of children about a stone-cutter, "Danila", who strives for perfection and meets with the mystical "Queen of Copper Hill". She asks him to sacrifice himself and remain with her in her unreachable world of stone at the expense of his married life with "Katinka", the girl he loves and whom he has just married.

The film is made in colour which is refreshing for 1946 and it is 15 minutes longer than described on IMDb. However, the story drags. The Russian hierarchy is very effectively captured - we witness the cruelties of the ruling classes who take to flogging the poor. They don't just flog them, they beat them to death for not working hard enough or not finishing a piece of work in time. Danila's talent at stone sculpture results in him being commissioned to make a piece for a wealthy landowner who wants to show off. However, the "Queen of Copper Hill" intervenes. It takes ages for this part of the story to get going, though.

Vladimir Druzhnikov is good in the lead role as "Danila". He looks a bit gay and girlie and very much suits the artistic type that is required for the film. The sets within the world of stone in Copper Hill are interesting in a "Star Trek" kind of way but each section of the film just seems to drag on for too long. Apart from the dance sequence in the wedding episode - one of the more entertaining parts of the film.

I also felt that the ending of the film could have been better. It's a happy-ending story but it would have been far more effective as a tragedy. We are led to believe that the Queen of Copper Hill has an evil sacrifice up her sleeve and that someone is going to get turned to stone for eternity. This is exactly what the film needs. But it doesn't happen. She suddenly switches to a goodie and we get a "love conquers all" message which is a disappointment. The film keeps you watching with false expectations and I felt cheated at the end. The rules suddenly change from "You can never go back!" to "Ok you can go back now". Very lame. The film needed an effective finale, ie, some tragedy, to redeem the rest of the tedious film but it didn't happen. It scores for novelty value only.

Seen shortly after it was released. A beautiful, and apparently rare film, since I have never seen a video of it available. Easily equal to the work of Serge Eisenstein, produced during the Stalinist days of the USSR, but is a telling of a famous Russian fable. An excellent film, which should be on video.

I saw "The Stone Flower" in 1952 at Iowa State University's (then a state college) student union. I was a second or third grader, but I have never forgotten the magic of this Russian fable, the movie's gorgeous images and its powerful drama. I remember a wicked queen who turned the heroine into stone and the soft images of the lush rose-colored stone flower that remained for the hero to find after great struggles with the evil queen and her sinister minions.

Some sets were simple and rather bare. I like the earlier comment about "The Red Shoes," another post-war film from the recovering European film industries, with the same pre-war quality story lines and great effort to use color and images well, but with truly scarce resources.

I am so thrilled to find that others remember this wonderful film that seemed to have disappeared. I hope someone can find a print to share with film historians and certainly with other children. More than 50 years later, I can thank my mother for taking me to share the beautiful Stone Flower that I have never forgotten.

The art direction and production design in the movie is really quite fetching. The physical film that was accordingly used to shoot 'The stone flower' resulted in rich, vibrant colors that allow every little trait to pop out brilliantly. Wonderful attention to hair, makeup, costume design, and set design and decoration, and every nuance of the cast's performances, is realized with inspiring vividness. Moreover, director Aleksandr Ptushko demonstrates a keen eye for arranging some fine shots, solid camerawork, and good care for lighting. And these are only just the visual aspects of what is an engaging, charming interpretation of a folk tale.

All the assembled actors put on fine displays of their skills to bring the picture to life, with Vladimir Druzhnikov especially notable as protagonist Danilo - believably portraying the young man's resolve, and obsession. Yet to discuss such facets at greater length seems unimportant when above all they serve simply as a component of the whole. It's the writing and direction that makes 'The stone flower' the entertaining classic that it is. Characters generally aren't written with especial depth, but like the acting, they work to complete the tableau. So it is too with the dialogue, very much feeling like the living communication of the sort of story that would be passed down over years - in no few ways a fable about the folly of pride, and ambition. And with that said, the fantastical scene writing and overall narrative are the greatest treasures here: terrifically entrancing, flush with detail and careful consideration, and enriching the entirety of the feature in their excellence. Druzhnikov matches the grand screenplay with adept focus and dexterity, tying the picture together with marvelous, expert finesse.

Factor in winsome set pieces, modest but suitable special effects - on par with any of the era - and gratifying instances of deftly arranged song and dance, and 'The stone flower' quite feels like it could be an early live-action production of Walt Disney's imagination. It's superb in its craft, and pleasantly endearing - really just an all-around lovely slice of cinema. If I have any specific criticism to make, it may perhaps be that the pacing struggles early on to find its footing. Yet for as splendidly well as the film is made, what slight deficiencies do crop up are negligible, and not truly significant. This is a magically, quietly engrossing movie, appropriate for all ages, that I think is surely very enjoyable for any viewer receptive to the type of story that it relates. I'd have no qualms recommending this to just about anyone - 'The stone flower' is a lot more fun, satisfying, and even rewarding than I thought it was going to be, and this is well worth checking out if you have the opportunity!