La subasta

Appearantly this was the last comical short which starred the two boys in the leading roles. Too bad they didn't ended it with a blast. But still, this movie is just as good as most of their other works of course and it has some good and entertaining moments in it.

The story is just above average. It's your typical Laurel & Hardy stuff in which the boys get into some serious and unlikely trouble again. It's nothing special but the story and the movie in general serves its purpose to entertain and amuse its viewers.

The movie begins good with some typical slapstick moments. This is Laurel & Hardy at their best. After that the boys get into some more trouble, which also involves of course once more one of their wives and luckily it also involves James Finlayson again. His role is quite small and not really that impressive but his presence alone is more than enough reason to consider this movie an entertaining and above average one. All of the comical moments are rather predictable but executed very well, due to some good timing and acting by especially Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy. The ending of the movie might feel out of place but nevertheless it's pretty entertaining to watch Stan Laurel imitate Oliver Hardy and vice versa. They both did a good job at imitating each other there and it surely made me laugh.

All in all it's a well made, consistent comedy by James W. Horne, who probably was the best and most consistent director of Laurel & Hardy pictures. Not their best or most memorable work but nevertheless a worthy last comedy short by the famous comical duo.

7/10

http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/

Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy were comedic geniuses, individually and together, and their partnership was deservedly iconic and one of the best there was. They left behind a large body of work, a vast majority of it being entertaining to classic comedy, at their best they were hilarious and their best efforts were great examples of how to do comedy without being juvenile or distasteful.

Although more than fine in its own right, 'Thicker Than Water' is most notable for being their last short film, meaning them in the lead roles and not just a cameo appearance. Didn't find 'Thicker Than Water' one of the duo's best, in a filmography that was mostly solid to classic (only '45 Minutes from Hollywood' misfired for me but that was very early on when their partnership and style hadn't formed or evolved and when Hardy especially was not being used well), nonetheless it is still very good and has much of what makes Laurel and Hardy's work as appealing as it is.

Flaws are very little and more nit-picks really. The story is slight and a bit disjointed.

Do also agree to an extent that while the ending is very funny, it also felt a little tacked on.

More often than not though, 'Thicker Than Water' is great fun, not always hilarious but has enough amusing parts. It is never too silly, it doesn't lose its energy and the sly wit is here, some of the material may not be new but how it's executed actually doesn't feel too familiar and it doesn't get repetitive. The physical comedy comes thick and fast and choreographed and performed beautifully, and the witty verbal interplay shines every bit as much. The beginning is one of the duo's funniest.

Laurel and Hardy are on top form here, both are well used, both have material worthy of them and they're equal rather than one being funnier than the other (before Laurel tended to be funnier and more interesting than Hardy, who tended to be underused). Their chemistry sparkles and after taking time their early efforts to fully form it certainly felt well established from 'Two Tars' onwards and since then has not let up. Their comic timing is impeccable, both in the physical comedy than the verbal.

'Thicker Than Water' looks good visually, the energy is there from start to finish and the direction shows a sense of being at ease with the material and doesn't let it get too busy or static. Daphne Pollard and James Finlayson are great support.

Overall, very good. Not essential or classic Laurel and Hardy, but a good representation of them. 8/10 Bethany Cox

Another fabulous short from Stan and Ollie, this time finding Ollie with money troubles, drawing his (and his wifes) savings from the bank to pay off their furniture! One thing leads to another, but I won't spoil it if you haven't seen it! Brilliant, and some of the lines in this movie are classic! 7.5/10

In their partnership, Stan and Ollie made quite a few domestic comedies--particularly those where Ollie has an angry and domineering wife. So, this territory is certainly not unusual. However, the comedy short is still very well handled and is quite creative as well--providing more than enough reason to recommend this little film.

Ollie is married to a tough little woman. In fact, the contrast between them is funny in itself. Ollie is of course big and fat, but his wife is so tiny, seeing her scolding him and bullying him is pretty funny. In fact, late in the film, she needs to stand on a chair when she ultimately smacks him over the head with a frying pan! So how did their domestic bliss degenerate to such depths? Well, much of it seems to arise from allowing Stanley to live with them as a border and Ollie's stupid decision to actually listen to one of Stan's "good ideas". Given she has to deal with BOTH these men, I guess I can forgive Mrs. Hardy for being so angry!! Perhaps the one thing I like about the film best were its scene transitions. In a truly unusual and cute touch, Stan and Ollie often stop the scene they were doing and then walked to the corner of the scene and then "pulling" the next scene into the camera! This sliding transition was very well done and it was cute when they would say something like "wait" and then do this.

As the end of the film goes, I am a tad uncertain what I thought of it. Sure, seeing Ollie pay the price for his stupidity by getting slugged over the head with the frying pan and ending up in the hospital is kind of funny, but it's also a tad cruel and how all this is wrapped up it totally bizarre (albeit, funny). I think you just have to see it--I'd hate to spoil the ending by going any further.

I won't wade into the same territory that others have. I think the dish washing scene was perhaps the most "Laurel and Hardy-esque" scene in the film, but the one in Helpmates was better.

Personally I felt that the banter about who gave the money to whom went on a bit longer than it needed to. I hope audiences in 1935 found it more engaging than I did.

The main reason I wanted to write a review is that I was impressed by the creative and clever way they handled scene changes from the Hardy house to other locations. Stanley grabs what might be some sort of pocket door or panel (if it were a real house) and pulls on its thick black border to walk it across the screen. The scene changes with it. In one of these clever "wipes" he accidentally lets go and it returns to the right side of the screen. So he grabs it again and walks it across the room. The scene change follows the movement of this panel. I haven't seen this trick done before. And being that this was decades before green screen, it must have been rather labor intensive to handle it in the cutting room. Bravo for this quirky little technique!