Charlot, de conquista

hello. 20 minutes of love is very important as it was chaplins first time directing. for that reason alone is enough to make it historic. true, it is not classic chaplin. true, it is not a great comedy. not even for that era. but if you think that chaplin could, as he said something to the effect of give me a park, a pretty girl, and a cop and i can make a movie. well that is what he did. i feel it is so interesting to be able to watch is film acting and directing in it's infancy, and see how he progressed through the years. not many artists work can be seen in such an early stage as chaplins. i think i'll go watch it now. mac estelle

In Chaplin's first film as director, he doesn't come flying out of the gates, instantly showing that he will go on to be a great filmmaker. 20 Minutes of Love is not much different from the films that he made in the months before or after, although it is interesting to see one of the first of his mostly improvised films made in a park with some couples and a police officer and little else. Like so many of his other comedies this one turns into little more than a lot of kicking and punching and throwing the entire cast into a lake, but given the amount of short films almost identical to this one that Chaplin cranked out, it is clear that the audiences at the time were having a blast.

The plot itself is even more difficult to follow than they usually are in Chaplin's early work. It involves Charlie wandering around a park and making ridiculously overt passes at women who are sitting on park benches with their boyfriends or husbands, and then there is a stolen watch thrown into the mix and a subsequent conflict involving who owns it and who stole it. Probably the best moment in the film is when Charlie gives the watch away to a pretty girl and then is so proud that he is just beside himself. Pretty amusing, and a lot of the Tramp's characterization also comes through even in this very early film.

It should be noted that you should not expect to find tiny, forgotten gems of masterpiece comedy by looking at Chaplin's early work, because film was an emerging medium and Chaplin himself was an inexperienced filmmaker from any perspective, but unfortunately 20 Minutes of Love, even though it is Chaplin's first film as director and therefore a film-making landmark, is also clearly the work of someone who had little experience in film-making and was still not sure where his career as a filmmaker would take him.

Am a big fan of Charlie Chaplin, have been for over a decade now. Many films and shorts of his are very good to masterpiece, and like many others consider him a comedy genius and one of film's most important and influential directors.

He did do much better than his directing debut 'Twenty Minutes of Love', still made very early on in his career where he was still finding his feet and not fully formed what he became famous for. Can understand why the Keystone period suffered from not being as best remembered or highly remembered than his later efforts, but they are mainly decent and important in their own right. 'Twenty Minutes of Love' is a long way from a career high, but has some nice things about it.

'Twenty Minutes of Love' is not as hilarious, charming or touching as his later work and some other shorts in the same period. The story is flimsy and the production values not as audacious. Things feel a little scrappy and confused at times and Chaplin's directing debut does betray inexperience.

For someone who was still relatively new to the film industry and had literally just moved on from their stage background, 'Twenty Minutes of Love' is not bad at all.

While not audacious, the film hardly looks ugly, is more than competently directed and is appealingly played. Chaplin looks comfortable for so early on and shows his stage expertise while opening it up that it doesn't become stagy or repetitive shtick.

Although the humour, charm and emotion was done even better and became more refined later, 'Twenty Minutes of Love' is mildly amusing, sweet and easy to like, though the emotion is not quite there. It moves reasonably quickly, though not without its dull spots, and doesn't feel too long or short.

Overall, far from one of Chaplin's best and patchy but not bad. 6/10 Bethany Cox

If you want your vision of Chaplin limited to a lovable tramp and you get your belly laughs from pathos, watch something else. If, however, you love slapstick comedy as performed by one of the best, do watch this one.

The image is of the tramp who really cannot get the girl. He spots another couple kissing on a park bench, and he has a blast ruining their fun.

This is one of Chaplin's "park comedies," filmed in Mack Sennett's park, with pickpockets and cops and couples. These shorts work, as the format allows Chaplin to shine as he weaves through predicaments.

I checked the box, as this could be considered a spoiler, though it's not if you've seen these films. Everyone ends up in the pond except Chaplin. He gets the girl, who in this case was played by Minta Durfee, a.k.a. Mrs. Roscoe "Fatty" Arbuckle.

They only got ten minutes for that twenty minutes of love. 'Twenty Minutes of Love' is widely considered as Charles Chaplin's directorial debut, although many sources claim the director being Joseph Maddern. I don't know how big was Chaplin's creative input, but some sources claim that he took the responsibility to cover the financial losses if the film didn't make any profit. Well, the movie was a success, and all we know for sure that Chaplin went on with a highly successful and prolific director career.

This movie still doesn't show any signs of the true genius of its main star, writer, and (supposed) director. The story is simple and amusing but ends up with the usual Keystone-style slapstick violence where everyone gets their share. Chaplin's Tramp interrupts with two lovers courting on the park bench. He is chased-off by the angry boyfriend. The Tramp soon becomes entangled with the difficult relationship between another couple. Of course, he manages to disturb the third couple as well.

Entertaining, for sure, but only for those ten minutes. The movie is not very memorable and offers nothing inventive yet. The Tramp is still just a scoundrel who goes around just causing trouble. But I liked how the plot elements all came together at the end giving the viewer a satisfying and complete story.