PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
6,9/10
13 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
El proyecto Treadstone, tras crear al súper espía Jason Bourne, se prepara para desarrollar imparables asesinos sobrehumanos.El proyecto Treadstone, tras crear al súper espía Jason Bourne, se prepara para desarrollar imparables asesinos sobrehumanos.El proyecto Treadstone, tras crear al súper espía Jason Bourne, se prepara para desarrollar imparables asesinos sobrehumanos.
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Explorar episodios
Reseñas destacadas
The series was extremely good in my opinion not quite 10/10 top tier but one of the better action series around if a little predictable at tunes but just enough other twists to keep you guessing. Unfortunately however the series hasn't been renewed and the story did not conclude at all the most annoying thing when you get invested into a show! If you don't like that happening I'd give it a miss and save yourself the pain and annoyance.
Wow. I don't see how anyone can rate this mess above a four.
The dialogue is idiotic. And the plotting is absurd.
One of the professional reviewers, I believe it was Ebert, called this a "mush' and I agree.
Great sets, great casting, plot captivating and easy to follow, great choreography fight scenes ...the essence of the books and movies!
No pc, no social agenda forced on us, no identity politics - that's extremely rare, these days with new series and movies!
Good job!
No pc, no social agenda forced on us, no identity politics - that's extremely rare, these days with new series and movies!
Good job!
The last episode in no way gives a resolution to everything going on. finishes at least two episodes short. if they don't renew for a new season, we're all screwed!!!!
The story follows several different dormant sleeper agents around the world as they get reactivated, while also depicting the fallout from project Treadstone in the present day. It also depicts the past, introducing how it all began. It is pretty well done, but it does have flaws.
The quality of each story varies, but it is great to see people in non-English speaking countries be given scope not to use English, irrespective of the quality of speech/pronunciation. I particularly like the events set in the past, and the story set in North Korea (though I'd query the quality of show's depiction of NK). Most of the storylines are enjoyable to watch.
The flaw: The storyline which should bring these disparate stories together or at least provide connection is pretty poorly done. I like the actors individually (Michelle Forbes, Omar Metwally and Tracy Ifeachor) but their storyline and the characters they depict destroy any goodwill/ suspension of disbelief the audience has. (They may as well be on a different TV show).
Particularly Tracy Ifeachor, it may not be fair, but she looks too young to be a seasoned journalist; her role as a freelance journalist uber-driver and the way she's wrangled into the plot is terrible. It's a pity because there could have easily been a more credible version of the present day CIA operation involving a journalist, in keeping with all the other storylines.
I'm giving it an 8 because it is ambitious, and only one of the storylines actively bothers me. But I don't think it will see a 2nd season, and I understand why.
Having said that, reviewers that simply state 'subtitles suck' should stick to low-brow cartoons. Not everything needs immediate explanation, many seem either too stupid or too impatient to accept that. Formulaic and 'exposition heavy' American telly has definitely addled the minds.
The quality of each story varies, but it is great to see people in non-English speaking countries be given scope not to use English, irrespective of the quality of speech/pronunciation. I particularly like the events set in the past, and the story set in North Korea (though I'd query the quality of show's depiction of NK). Most of the storylines are enjoyable to watch.
The flaw: The storyline which should bring these disparate stories together or at least provide connection is pretty poorly done. I like the actors individually (Michelle Forbes, Omar Metwally and Tracy Ifeachor) but their storyline and the characters they depict destroy any goodwill/ suspension of disbelief the audience has. (They may as well be on a different TV show).
Particularly Tracy Ifeachor, it may not be fair, but she looks too young to be a seasoned journalist; her role as a freelance journalist uber-driver and the way she's wrangled into the plot is terrible. It's a pity because there could have easily been a more credible version of the present day CIA operation involving a journalist, in keeping with all the other storylines.
I'm giving it an 8 because it is ambitious, and only one of the storylines actively bothers me. But I don't think it will see a 2nd season, and I understand why.
Having said that, reviewers that simply state 'subtitles suck' should stick to low-brow cartoons. Not everything needs immediate explanation, many seem either too stupid or too impatient to accept that. Formulaic and 'exposition heavy' American telly has definitely addled the minds.
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThis series was originally being developed at CBS by Anthony E. Zuiker in 2010, but it was shut down at the insistence of Tony Gilroy, who was gearing up to direct El legado de Bourne (2012) and did not want another Bourne project competing with his film.
- ConexionesSpin-off from The Bourne Identity: El caso Bourne (2002)
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta